验证自我管理痤疮严重指数在一个方便的成人样本。

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Alexander D Woods, Stuti Prajapati, Shivali S Desai, Caroline L Porter, Caitlin G Purvis, Steven R Feldman
{"title":"验证自我管理痤疮严重指数在一个方便的成人样本。","authors":"Alexander D Woods, Stuti Prajapati, Shivali S Desai, Caroline L Porter, Caitlin G Purvis, Steven R Feldman","doi":"10.1177/12034754251343884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients' perception of their acne severity may vary and not correlate well with objective clinical acne grading systems. A self-administered acne severity measure allowing patients to accurately assess their facial acne severity would be useful for tracking acne severity in survey research.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate a novel Self-Administered Acne Severity Index (SAASI) for use in adult survey research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five hundred and ninety participants were recruited through Amazon Mechanical Turk, an online crowdsourcing platform. Participants rated 8 \"gold standard\" dermatologist-rated acne images subjectively and then with the SAASI. The SAASI consists of reference photographs and descriptive multiple-choice questions. Participants' subjective assessments of acne severity, photo-assisted ratings, and SAASI ratings were compared with the dermatologists' ratings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and seventy-one participants met inclusion criteria. Participants' subjective impressions of acne severity agreed with the dermatologist ratings 73.2% of the time, compared to 67.1% with the photo-assisted ratings and 70.1% with the SAASI ratings. Light-skin images had 53% greater odds of being rated accurately than dark-skin images, and severe acne images were rated most accurately, followed by clear, mild, and moderate acne.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants' subjective acne severity ratings had moderate agreement with dermatologists' rating, and the SAASI provided a formal measure with the similar level of agreement. The SAASI was a more precise rating system than raters by themselves, and improved participants' ability to rate moderate acne. Further research may help delineate the reproducibility of these results in diverse patient populations. At present, the SAASI may facilitate acne survey research by providing a simple, formal instrument for severity assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"12034754251343884"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a Self-Administered Acne Severity Index in a Convenience Sample of Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander D Woods, Stuti Prajapati, Shivali S Desai, Caroline L Porter, Caitlin G Purvis, Steven R Feldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/12034754251343884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients' perception of their acne severity may vary and not correlate well with objective clinical acne grading systems. A self-administered acne severity measure allowing patients to accurately assess their facial acne severity would be useful for tracking acne severity in survey research.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate a novel Self-Administered Acne Severity Index (SAASI) for use in adult survey research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five hundred and ninety participants were recruited through Amazon Mechanical Turk, an online crowdsourcing platform. Participants rated 8 \\\"gold standard\\\" dermatologist-rated acne images subjectively and then with the SAASI. The SAASI consists of reference photographs and descriptive multiple-choice questions. Participants' subjective assessments of acne severity, photo-assisted ratings, and SAASI ratings were compared with the dermatologists' ratings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and seventy-one participants met inclusion criteria. Participants' subjective impressions of acne severity agreed with the dermatologist ratings 73.2% of the time, compared to 67.1% with the photo-assisted ratings and 70.1% with the SAASI ratings. Light-skin images had 53% greater odds of being rated accurately than dark-skin images, and severe acne images were rated most accurately, followed by clear, mild, and moderate acne.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants' subjective acne severity ratings had moderate agreement with dermatologists' rating, and the SAASI provided a formal measure with the similar level of agreement. The SAASI was a more precise rating system than raters by themselves, and improved participants' ability to rate moderate acne. Further research may help delineate the reproducibility of these results in diverse patient populations. At present, the SAASI may facilitate acne survey research by providing a simple, formal instrument for severity assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"12034754251343884\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/12034754251343884\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/12034754251343884","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患者对其痤疮严重程度的感知可能会有所不同,并且与客观的临床痤疮分级系统不太相关。一个自我管理的痤疮严重程度的措施,允许患者准确地评估他们的面部痤疮严重程度将有助于跟踪痤疮严重程度的调查研究。目的:评价一种新的自行给药痤疮严重程度指数(SAASI)在成人调查研究中的应用。方法:通过在线众包平台Amazon Mechanical Turk招募590名参与者。参与者主观评价了8张皮肤科医生评价的“金标准”痤疮图像,然后使用SAASI。SAASI包括参考照片和描述性多项选择题。参与者对痤疮严重程度的主观评估、照片辅助评分和SAASI评分与皮肤科医生的评分进行比较。结果:371名受试者符合纳入标准。参与者对痤疮严重程度的主观印象与皮肤科医生的评分一致的比例为73.2%,相比之下,照片辅助评分为67.1%,SAASI评分为70.1%。浅色皮肤的照片比深色皮肤的照片被准确评价的几率高53%,严重痤疮的照片被准确评价的几率最高,其次是清晰、轻度和中度痤疮。结论:受试者的主观痤疮严重程度评分与皮肤科医生的评分有中等程度的一致,而SAASI提供了一个具有类似一致水平的正式测量。SAASI是一个比自行评分者更精确的评分系统,并提高了参与者对中度痤疮的评分能力。进一步的研究可能有助于描述这些结果在不同患者群体中的可重复性。目前,SAASI可以通过提供一个简单、正式的严重程度评估工具来促进痤疮调查研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of a Self-Administered Acne Severity Index in a Convenience Sample of Adults.

Background: Patients' perception of their acne severity may vary and not correlate well with objective clinical acne grading systems. A self-administered acne severity measure allowing patients to accurately assess their facial acne severity would be useful for tracking acne severity in survey research.

Objectives: To evaluate a novel Self-Administered Acne Severity Index (SAASI) for use in adult survey research.

Methods: Five hundred and ninety participants were recruited through Amazon Mechanical Turk, an online crowdsourcing platform. Participants rated 8 "gold standard" dermatologist-rated acne images subjectively and then with the SAASI. The SAASI consists of reference photographs and descriptive multiple-choice questions. Participants' subjective assessments of acne severity, photo-assisted ratings, and SAASI ratings were compared with the dermatologists' ratings.

Results: Three hundred and seventy-one participants met inclusion criteria. Participants' subjective impressions of acne severity agreed with the dermatologist ratings 73.2% of the time, compared to 67.1% with the photo-assisted ratings and 70.1% with the SAASI ratings. Light-skin images had 53% greater odds of being rated accurately than dark-skin images, and severe acne images were rated most accurately, followed by clear, mild, and moderate acne.

Conclusion: Participants' subjective acne severity ratings had moderate agreement with dermatologists' rating, and the SAASI provided a formal measure with the similar level of agreement. The SAASI was a more precise rating system than raters by themselves, and improved participants' ability to rate moderate acne. Further research may help delineate the reproducibility of these results in diverse patient populations. At present, the SAASI may facilitate acne survey research by providing a simple, formal instrument for severity assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery (JCMS) aims to reflect the state of the art in cutaneous biology and dermatology by providing original scientific writings, as well as a complete critical review of the dermatology literature for clinicians, trainees, and academicians. JCMS endeavours to bring readers cutting edge dermatologic information in two distinct formats. Part of each issue features scholarly research and articles on issues of basic and applied science, insightful case reports, comprehensive continuing medical education, and in depth reviews, all of which provide theoretical framework for practitioners to make sound practical decisions. The evolving field of dermatology is highlighted through these articles. In addition, part of each issue is dedicated to making the most important developments in dermatology easily accessible to the clinician by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information in a format that is interesting, clearly presented, and useful to patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信