蓝桉叶提取物、亚洲果酸和熊果酸对牛乳腺炎分离菌的抑菌和抗生物膜活性研究。

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Frontiers in Veterinary Science Pub Date : 2025-05-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fvets.2025.1565787
Nicolò Mezzasalma, Costanza Spadini, Chiara Spaggiari, Giannamaria Annunziato, Valentina Andreoli, Alice Prosperi, Lorenzo Mochen, Sandro Cavirani, Stefano Grolli, Simone Taddei, Gabriele Costantino, Clotilde Silvia Cabassi
{"title":"蓝桉叶提取物、亚洲果酸和熊果酸对牛乳腺炎分离菌的抑菌和抗生物膜活性研究。","authors":"Nicolò Mezzasalma, Costanza Spadini, Chiara Spaggiari, Giannamaria Annunziato, Valentina Andreoli, Alice Prosperi, Lorenzo Mochen, Sandro Cavirani, Stefano Grolli, Simone Taddei, Gabriele Costantino, Clotilde Silvia Cabassi","doi":"10.3389/fvets.2025.1565787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibiotics represent the first line therapy for bovine mastitis. However, the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) highlights the need for alternative therapeutic approaches. This study evaluated the antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities of <i>Eucalyptus globulus</i> leaf extract (EGL-L), ursolic acid (UA) and asiatic acid (AA) against <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (SA), <i>Streptococcus uberis</i> (SU), <i>Streptococcus agalactiae</i> (SAG), and <i>Enterococcus</i> spp. (EN) isolated from bovine mastitis, 39.7% of which were MDROs. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) assay demonstrated that all the compounds exhibited antimicrobial activity against the tested bacteria, including MDROs. However, EGL-L was less effective (<i>p</i> < 0.001) than UA or AA against field strains. UA was more effective against SAG and SU compared to SA (<i>p</i> < 0.001), whereas AA was more effective against SU than SA (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Conversely, EGL-L exhibited similar inhibitory effects on all bacteria. The biofilm-forming ability of the bacterial strains was also assessed, and the minimal biofilm inhibitory concentrations (MBICs) of the compounds were evaluated for moderate and strong biofilm producers. None of the compounds were able to completely inhibit biofilm formation. However, MBIC<sub>80</sub> values within the tested concentration range were achieved for 15 out of 32 strains with EGL-L and for 27 out of 32 strains with UA and AA. These findings highlight a promising alternative to conventional antimicrobials for AA and UA, showing potential for topical intramammary use for the control and prevention of bovine mastitis, especially because of their efficacy against biofilm formation. Future research should focus on toxicity assessments and formulation development for potential topical administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":12772,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","volume":"12 ","pages":"1565787"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12117823/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of <i>Eucalyptus globulus</i> leaf extract, asiatic acid and ursolic acid against bacteria isolated from bovine mastitis.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolò Mezzasalma, Costanza Spadini, Chiara Spaggiari, Giannamaria Annunziato, Valentina Andreoli, Alice Prosperi, Lorenzo Mochen, Sandro Cavirani, Stefano Grolli, Simone Taddei, Gabriele Costantino, Clotilde Silvia Cabassi\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fvets.2025.1565787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antibiotics represent the first line therapy for bovine mastitis. However, the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) highlights the need for alternative therapeutic approaches. This study evaluated the antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities of <i>Eucalyptus globulus</i> leaf extract (EGL-L), ursolic acid (UA) and asiatic acid (AA) against <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (SA), <i>Streptococcus uberis</i> (SU), <i>Streptococcus agalactiae</i> (SAG), and <i>Enterococcus</i> spp. (EN) isolated from bovine mastitis, 39.7% of which were MDROs. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) assay demonstrated that all the compounds exhibited antimicrobial activity against the tested bacteria, including MDROs. However, EGL-L was less effective (<i>p</i> < 0.001) than UA or AA against field strains. UA was more effective against SAG and SU compared to SA (<i>p</i> < 0.001), whereas AA was more effective against SU than SA (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Conversely, EGL-L exhibited similar inhibitory effects on all bacteria. The biofilm-forming ability of the bacterial strains was also assessed, and the minimal biofilm inhibitory concentrations (MBICs) of the compounds were evaluated for moderate and strong biofilm producers. None of the compounds were able to completely inhibit biofilm formation. However, MBIC<sub>80</sub> values within the tested concentration range were achieved for 15 out of 32 strains with EGL-L and for 27 out of 32 strains with UA and AA. These findings highlight a promising alternative to conventional antimicrobials for AA and UA, showing potential for topical intramammary use for the control and prevention of bovine mastitis, especially because of their efficacy against biofilm formation. Future research should focus on toxicity assessments and formulation development for potential topical administration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Veterinary Science\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1565787\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12117823/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Veterinary Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1565787\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1565787","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗生素是治疗牛乳腺炎的一线药物。然而,越来越多的耐多药生物(mdro)的流行突出了替代治疗方法的必要性。本研究评价了蓝桉叶提取物(EGL-L)、熊果酸(UA)和亚洲果酸(AA)对牛乳腺炎中分离的金黄色葡萄球菌(SA)、uberis链球菌(SU)、无乳链球菌(SAG)和肠球菌(EN)的抑菌活性和抗膜活性,其中MDROs占39.7%。最小抑菌浓度(MIC)试验表明,所有化合物对被试细菌都具有抗菌活性,包括MDROs。而EGL-L的效果较差(p p p ),32株EGL-L菌株中有15株达到80个浓度范围,32株UA和AA菌株中有27株达到80个浓度范围。这些发现突出了传统抗菌剂AA和UA的一个有希望的替代方案,显示了局部乳内应用于控制和预防牛乳腺炎的潜力,特别是因为它们对生物膜形成的功效。未来的研究应侧重于毒性评估和潜在外用药物的配方开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of Eucalyptus globulus leaf extract, asiatic acid and ursolic acid against bacteria isolated from bovine mastitis.

Antibiotics represent the first line therapy for bovine mastitis. However, the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) highlights the need for alternative therapeutic approaches. This study evaluated the antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities of Eucalyptus globulus leaf extract (EGL-L), ursolic acid (UA) and asiatic acid (AA) against Staphylococcus aureus (SA), Streptococcus uberis (SU), Streptococcus agalactiae (SAG), and Enterococcus spp. (EN) isolated from bovine mastitis, 39.7% of which were MDROs. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) assay demonstrated that all the compounds exhibited antimicrobial activity against the tested bacteria, including MDROs. However, EGL-L was less effective (p < 0.001) than UA or AA against field strains. UA was more effective against SAG and SU compared to SA (p < 0.001), whereas AA was more effective against SU than SA (p < 0.001). Conversely, EGL-L exhibited similar inhibitory effects on all bacteria. The biofilm-forming ability of the bacterial strains was also assessed, and the minimal biofilm inhibitory concentrations (MBICs) of the compounds were evaluated for moderate and strong biofilm producers. None of the compounds were able to completely inhibit biofilm formation. However, MBIC80 values within the tested concentration range were achieved for 15 out of 32 strains with EGL-L and for 27 out of 32 strains with UA and AA. These findings highlight a promising alternative to conventional antimicrobials for AA and UA, showing potential for topical intramammary use for the control and prevention of bovine mastitis, especially because of their efficacy against biofilm formation. Future research should focus on toxicity assessments and formulation development for potential topical administration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Frontiers in Veterinary Science Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
1870
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Veterinary Science is a global, peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that bridges animal and human health, brings a comparative approach to medical and surgical challenges, and advances innovative biotechnology and therapy. Veterinary research today is interdisciplinary, collaborative, and socially relevant, transforming how we understand and investigate animal health and disease. Fundamental research in emerging infectious diseases, predictive genomics, stem cell therapy, and translational modelling is grounded within the integrative social context of public and environmental health, wildlife conservation, novel biomarkers, societal well-being, and cutting-edge clinical practice and specialization. Frontiers in Veterinary Science brings a 21st-century approach—networked, collaborative, and Open Access—to communicate this progress and innovation to both the specialist and to the wider audience of readers in the field. Frontiers in Veterinary Science publishes articles on outstanding discoveries across a wide spectrum of translational, foundational, and clinical research. The journal''s mission is to bring all relevant veterinary sciences together on a single platform with the goal of improving animal and human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信