Andrea Rosmery Iturralde Carrillo, Larissa Epstein, Carina Franco, Jennie Caluya, Natalie Coca, Krista L Haines, Jason Heard, Soman Sen, Tina Palmieri, Kathleen S Romanowski
{"title":"英语水平有限对烧伤后预后的影响。","authors":"Andrea Rosmery Iturralde Carrillo, Larissa Epstein, Carina Franco, Jennie Caluya, Natalie Coca, Krista L Haines, Jason Heard, Soman Sen, Tina Palmieri, Kathleen S Romanowski","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies indicate that surgical patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) experience longer hospital stays and higher emergency department (ED) recidivism. Burn care requires complex coordination for both inpatient and outpatient services, regardless of language preference. This study hypothesized that burn patients with LEP would have longer hospital stays, fewer follow-ups, and more ED visits. Following IRB approval, a retrospective chart review analyzed burn patients admitted between January 2018 and December 2019. Collected data included demographics, burn characteristics, outcomes, preferred language, and follow-up care. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS (version 9.4), employing Chi-square, Fisher Exact, Spearman Correlation, Wilcoxon 2-sample, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. A total of 751 patients (median age 46 years, IQR 26) were included, with 555 (73%) males and a median total body surface area (TBSA) burn of 6.5% (IQR 12). Among them, 15% had inhalation injuries, and 5% died. Sixty-one patients (8%) identified a preferred language other than English. LEP and English-speaking patients showed no significant differences in burn size (5.5% vs. 6.6%, p=0.32), mortality (3.3% vs. 4.7%, p=1), length of stay (8 vs. 9 days, p=0.43), or discharge to home (86.9% vs. 75.9%, p=0.44). However, LEP patients were more likely to have scheduled follow-ups (93.4% vs. 80.2%, p=0.04), attend visits (78.7% vs. 50.7%, p=0.0005), and revisit the ED (19.7% vs. 10.5%, p=0.03). These findings highlight disparities in discharge education and outpatient care, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to improve post-burn recovery in LEP populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Limited English Proficiency on Outcomes Following Burn Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Rosmery Iturralde Carrillo, Larissa Epstein, Carina Franco, Jennie Caluya, Natalie Coca, Krista L Haines, Jason Heard, Soman Sen, Tina Palmieri, Kathleen S Romanowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/iraf099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Studies indicate that surgical patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) experience longer hospital stays and higher emergency department (ED) recidivism. Burn care requires complex coordination for both inpatient and outpatient services, regardless of language preference. This study hypothesized that burn patients with LEP would have longer hospital stays, fewer follow-ups, and more ED visits. Following IRB approval, a retrospective chart review analyzed burn patients admitted between January 2018 and December 2019. Collected data included demographics, burn characteristics, outcomes, preferred language, and follow-up care. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS (version 9.4), employing Chi-square, Fisher Exact, Spearman Correlation, Wilcoxon 2-sample, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. A total of 751 patients (median age 46 years, IQR 26) were included, with 555 (73%) males and a median total body surface area (TBSA) burn of 6.5% (IQR 12). Among them, 15% had inhalation injuries, and 5% died. Sixty-one patients (8%) identified a preferred language other than English. LEP and English-speaking patients showed no significant differences in burn size (5.5% vs. 6.6%, p=0.32), mortality (3.3% vs. 4.7%, p=1), length of stay (8 vs. 9 days, p=0.43), or discharge to home (86.9% vs. 75.9%, p=0.44). However, LEP patients were more likely to have scheduled follow-ups (93.4% vs. 80.2%, p=0.04), attend visits (78.7% vs. 50.7%, p=0.0005), and revisit the ED (19.7% vs. 10.5%, p=0.03). These findings highlight disparities in discharge education and outpatient care, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to improve post-burn recovery in LEP populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf099\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf099","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究表明,英语水平有限的外科患者住院时间较长,急诊科(ED)再犯率较高。无论语言偏好如何,烧伤护理需要住院和门诊服务的复杂协调。本研究假设伴有LEP的烧伤患者住院时间更长,随访时间更少,急诊科就诊次数更多。在IRB批准后,回顾性图表审查分析了2018年1月至2019年12月期间入院的烧伤患者。收集的数据包括人口统计学、烧伤特征、结局、首选语言和随访护理。采用SAS (version 9.4)进行统计分析,采用卡方检验、Fisher精确检验、Spearman相关检验、Wilcoxon 2-样本检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验。共纳入751例患者(中位年龄46岁,IQR 26),其中男性555例(73%),中位体表面积(TBSA)烧伤6.5% (IQR 12)。其中吸入性损伤15%,死亡5%。61名患者(8%)确定了英语以外的首选语言。LEP患者和英语患者在烧伤面积(5.5% vs. 6.6%, p=0.32)、死亡率(3.3% vs. 4.7%, p=1)、住院时间(8 vs. 9天,p=0.43)或出院回家(86.9% vs. 75.9%, p=0.44)方面无显著差异。然而,LEP患者更有可能安排随访(93.4% vs. 80.2%, p=0.04),参加就诊(78.7% vs. 50.7%, p=0.0005),并再次就诊(19.7% vs. 10.5%, p=0.03)。这些发现突出了出院教育和门诊护理的差异,强调需要有针对性的干预措施来改善LEP人群烧伤后的恢复。
Effects of Limited English Proficiency on Outcomes Following Burn Injury.
Studies indicate that surgical patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) experience longer hospital stays and higher emergency department (ED) recidivism. Burn care requires complex coordination for both inpatient and outpatient services, regardless of language preference. This study hypothesized that burn patients with LEP would have longer hospital stays, fewer follow-ups, and more ED visits. Following IRB approval, a retrospective chart review analyzed burn patients admitted between January 2018 and December 2019. Collected data included demographics, burn characteristics, outcomes, preferred language, and follow-up care. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS (version 9.4), employing Chi-square, Fisher Exact, Spearman Correlation, Wilcoxon 2-sample, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. A total of 751 patients (median age 46 years, IQR 26) were included, with 555 (73%) males and a median total body surface area (TBSA) burn of 6.5% (IQR 12). Among them, 15% had inhalation injuries, and 5% died. Sixty-one patients (8%) identified a preferred language other than English. LEP and English-speaking patients showed no significant differences in burn size (5.5% vs. 6.6%, p=0.32), mortality (3.3% vs. 4.7%, p=1), length of stay (8 vs. 9 days, p=0.43), or discharge to home (86.9% vs. 75.9%, p=0.44). However, LEP patients were more likely to have scheduled follow-ups (93.4% vs. 80.2%, p=0.04), attend visits (78.7% vs. 50.7%, p=0.0005), and revisit the ED (19.7% vs. 10.5%, p=0.03). These findings highlight disparities in discharge education and outpatient care, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to improve post-burn recovery in LEP populations.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.