系统性红斑狼疮临床试验中不公平人群代表性的系统评价。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Seth Sims, Kaylyn Rowsey, Christian Hemmerich, Haley Howard, Jay Babek, Garrett Jones, Simran Demla, Alicia Ito Ford, Matt Vassar
{"title":"系统性红斑狼疮临床试验中不公平人群代表性的系统评价。","authors":"Seth Sims, Kaylyn Rowsey, Christian Hemmerich, Haley Howard, Jay Babek, Garrett Jones, Simran Demla, Alicia Ito Ford, Matt Vassar","doi":"10.1002/acr.25576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the participation of historically marginalized populations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) clinical trials conducted in the US.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>SLE, a complex autoimmune disease characterized by a dysregulated immune response leading to inflammation and tissue damage in multiple organ systems, exhibits a mortality rate four times higher in historically marginalized populations compared to the general population. It is essential for clinical trials to accurately represent the disease population to effectively evaluate treatment modalities. However, the current trial design lacks appropriate representation of historically marginalized populations, limiting the generalizability of results. Our study addresses this research gap by evaluating the participant demographics in SLE clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant clinical trials were obtained in a comprehensive search of MEDLINE (PubMed) and Embase (Elsevier) in May of 2024. Included trials were published in the United States between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2023. Two reviewers independently performed screening and data extraction via a standardized Google Form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Having met our inclusion criteria, 18 U.S. SLE clinical trials were evaluated for participant sex, age, racial, and ethnic data. Analysis of sex/gender revealed that the included population accurately represented the disease population. Regarding race/ethnicity participation, 11/18 (61.1%) received an overall Poor rating, and none received a Good rating. Analysis revealed that 14/18 (77.8%) of studies demonstrated statistically insignificant underrepresentation of Black, Asian, and Hispanic populations. No studies reported the inclusion of older adults in their sample, suggesting a significant need for better age representation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study reveal disparities in the representation of the SLE disease population in clinical trials, emphasizing insufficient inclusion of Black, Asian, and Hispanic/Latinx participants and the disproportionate overrepresentation of white participants. Our study highlights the need for the initiation of effective strategies to engage historically marginalized populations in SLE clinical trials. Addressing these gaps is necessary to prioritize the participation of inequitable populations, increase standardization of SLE treatments, and improve the relevance of SLE research.</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review of Inequitable Population Representation in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Clinical Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Seth Sims, Kaylyn Rowsey, Christian Hemmerich, Haley Howard, Jay Babek, Garrett Jones, Simran Demla, Alicia Ito Ford, Matt Vassar\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acr.25576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the participation of historically marginalized populations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) clinical trials conducted in the US.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>SLE, a complex autoimmune disease characterized by a dysregulated immune response leading to inflammation and tissue damage in multiple organ systems, exhibits a mortality rate four times higher in historically marginalized populations compared to the general population. It is essential for clinical trials to accurately represent the disease population to effectively evaluate treatment modalities. However, the current trial design lacks appropriate representation of historically marginalized populations, limiting the generalizability of results. Our study addresses this research gap by evaluating the participant demographics in SLE clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant clinical trials were obtained in a comprehensive search of MEDLINE (PubMed) and Embase (Elsevier) in May of 2024. Included trials were published in the United States between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2023. Two reviewers independently performed screening and data extraction via a standardized Google Form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Having met our inclusion criteria, 18 U.S. SLE clinical trials were evaluated for participant sex, age, racial, and ethnic data. Analysis of sex/gender revealed that the included population accurately represented the disease population. Regarding race/ethnicity participation, 11/18 (61.1%) received an overall Poor rating, and none received a Good rating. Analysis revealed that 14/18 (77.8%) of studies demonstrated statistically insignificant underrepresentation of Black, Asian, and Hispanic populations. No studies reported the inclusion of older adults in their sample, suggesting a significant need for better age representation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study reveal disparities in the representation of the SLE disease population in clinical trials, emphasizing insufficient inclusion of Black, Asian, and Hispanic/Latinx participants and the disproportionate overrepresentation of white participants. Our study highlights the need for the initiation of effective strategies to engage historically marginalized populations in SLE clinical trials. Addressing these gaps is necessary to prioritize the participation of inequitable populations, increase standardization of SLE treatments, and improve the relevance of SLE research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25576\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25576","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估在美国进行的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)临床试验中历史边缘化人群的参与情况。背景:SLE是一种复杂的自身免疫性疾病,其特征是免疫反应失调,导致多器官系统的炎症和组织损伤,在历史上边缘化人群中的死亡率比普通人群高4倍。临床试验必须准确地代表疾病人群,才能有效地评估治疗方式。然而,目前的试验设计缺乏对历史边缘化人群的适当代表,限制了结果的普遍性。我们的研究通过评估SLE临床试验的参与者人口统计学来解决这一研究缺口。方法:综合检索2024年5月MEDLINE (PubMed)和Embase (Elsevier)的相关临床试验。纳入的试验于2018年1月1日至2023年12月31日在美国发表。两名审稿人通过标准化的谷歌表格独立进行筛选和数据提取。结果:符合我们的纳入标准,18项美国SLE临床试验评估了参与者的性别、年龄、种族和民族数据。性别分析显示,纳入的人群准确地代表了疾病人群。在种族/民族参与方面,11/18(61.1%)获得了总体差评,没有人获得了好评。分析显示,14/18(77.8%)的研究显示黑人、亚洲人和西班牙裔人口的代表性不足,在统计上并不显著。没有研究报告将老年人纳入他们的样本,这表明有必要更好地代表年龄。结论:本研究的结果揭示了临床试验中SLE疾病人群代表性的差异,强调黑人、亚洲人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔参与者的纳入不足,以及白人参与者的不成比例的过度代表性。我们的研究强调,需要启动有效的策略,让历史上边缘化的人群参与SLE临床试验。解决这些差距是必要的,以优先考虑不公平人群的参与,增加SLE治疗的标准化,并提高SLE研究的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic Review of Inequitable Population Representation in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Clinical Trials.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the participation of historically marginalized populations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) clinical trials conducted in the US.

Background: SLE, a complex autoimmune disease characterized by a dysregulated immune response leading to inflammation and tissue damage in multiple organ systems, exhibits a mortality rate four times higher in historically marginalized populations compared to the general population. It is essential for clinical trials to accurately represent the disease population to effectively evaluate treatment modalities. However, the current trial design lacks appropriate representation of historically marginalized populations, limiting the generalizability of results. Our study addresses this research gap by evaluating the participant demographics in SLE clinical trials.

Methods: Relevant clinical trials were obtained in a comprehensive search of MEDLINE (PubMed) and Embase (Elsevier) in May of 2024. Included trials were published in the United States between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2023. Two reviewers independently performed screening and data extraction via a standardized Google Form.

Results: Having met our inclusion criteria, 18 U.S. SLE clinical trials were evaluated for participant sex, age, racial, and ethnic data. Analysis of sex/gender revealed that the included population accurately represented the disease population. Regarding race/ethnicity participation, 11/18 (61.1%) received an overall Poor rating, and none received a Good rating. Analysis revealed that 14/18 (77.8%) of studies demonstrated statistically insignificant underrepresentation of Black, Asian, and Hispanic populations. No studies reported the inclusion of older adults in their sample, suggesting a significant need for better age representation.

Conclusion: The results of this study reveal disparities in the representation of the SLE disease population in clinical trials, emphasizing insufficient inclusion of Black, Asian, and Hispanic/Latinx participants and the disproportionate overrepresentation of white participants. Our study highlights the need for the initiation of effective strategies to engage historically marginalized populations in SLE clinical trials. Addressing these gaps is necessary to prioritize the participation of inequitable populations, increase standardization of SLE treatments, and improve the relevance of SLE research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
368
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信