{"title":"5年以上收缩压的访视变异性和难以察觉的心房传导的影响:通过p波信号平均心电图评估","authors":"Shinichiro Tanaka, Toshiyuki Noda, Tomonori Segawa, Makoto Iwama, Hiroto Yagasaki, Takahiro Ueno, Taro Minagawa, Shinya Minatoguchi","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Visit-to-visit variability in SBP (VVV-SBP) is associated with increased cardiac events, including atrial fibrillation (AF). P-wave signal-averaged electrocardiography (P-SAECG) detects subtle atrial conduction abnormalities such as atrial late potential (ALP). This study examined the association between VVV-SBP and atrial conduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 128 male participants (mean age: 50.8 ± 10.3 years) with normal cardiac function underwent annual blood pressure measurements over 5 years. VVV-SBP was assessed using both the SD and the coefficient of variation (CV) of SBP, calculated from five BP measurements taken annually during the 5 years prior to the P-SAECG. P-SAECG parameters included the filtered P-wave duration (FPD) and the root-mean-square voltage of the last 20 ms of the P-wave (RMS20). ALP positivity was defined as FPD > 120 ms and RMS20 < 3.5 µV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ALP positivity was observed in 33 participants (25.8%). SD-SBP was higher in the ALP-positive group (9.59 ± 4.15 vs. 7.92 ± 3.66 mmHg; P = 0.031). This trend was seen in CV-SBP (ALP-positive; 0.077 ± 0.031 vs. ALP-negative; 0.064 ± 0.027; P = 0.022). ALP positivity was significantly less frequent in the lowest quartile and more frequent in the highest quartile of both SD-SBP and CV-SBP. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, higher quartiles of both SD-SBP and CV-SBP were independently associated with ALP positivity (e.g. SD-4; P = 0.014; CV-4; P = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated VVV-SBP, assessed by SD and CV, is associated with impaired atrial conduction, highlighting its potential role as a predictor of atrial conduction abnormalities and a tool for AF risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure over 5 years and imperceptible atrial conduction: assessment by P-wave signal-averaged electrocardiography.\",\"authors\":\"Shinichiro Tanaka, Toshiyuki Noda, Tomonori Segawa, Makoto Iwama, Hiroto Yagasaki, Takahiro Ueno, Taro Minagawa, Shinya Minatoguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Visit-to-visit variability in SBP (VVV-SBP) is associated with increased cardiac events, including atrial fibrillation (AF). P-wave signal-averaged electrocardiography (P-SAECG) detects subtle atrial conduction abnormalities such as atrial late potential (ALP). This study examined the association between VVV-SBP and atrial conduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 128 male participants (mean age: 50.8 ± 10.3 years) with normal cardiac function underwent annual blood pressure measurements over 5 years. VVV-SBP was assessed using both the SD and the coefficient of variation (CV) of SBP, calculated from five BP measurements taken annually during the 5 years prior to the P-SAECG. P-SAECG parameters included the filtered P-wave duration (FPD) and the root-mean-square voltage of the last 20 ms of the P-wave (RMS20). ALP positivity was defined as FPD > 120 ms and RMS20 < 3.5 µV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ALP positivity was observed in 33 participants (25.8%). SD-SBP was higher in the ALP-positive group (9.59 ± 4.15 vs. 7.92 ± 3.66 mmHg; P = 0.031). This trend was seen in CV-SBP (ALP-positive; 0.077 ± 0.031 vs. ALP-negative; 0.064 ± 0.027; P = 0.022). ALP positivity was significantly less frequent in the lowest quartile and more frequent in the highest quartile of both SD-SBP and CV-SBP. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, higher quartiles of both SD-SBP and CV-SBP were independently associated with ALP positivity (e.g. SD-4; P = 0.014; CV-4; P = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated VVV-SBP, assessed by SD and CV, is associated with impaired atrial conduction, highlighting its potential role as a predictor of atrial conduction abnormalities and a tool for AF risk stratification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Pressure Monitoring\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Pressure Monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000757\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000757","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure over 5 years and imperceptible atrial conduction: assessment by P-wave signal-averaged electrocardiography.
Objective: Visit-to-visit variability in SBP (VVV-SBP) is associated with increased cardiac events, including atrial fibrillation (AF). P-wave signal-averaged electrocardiography (P-SAECG) detects subtle atrial conduction abnormalities such as atrial late potential (ALP). This study examined the association between VVV-SBP and atrial conduction.
Methods: A total of 128 male participants (mean age: 50.8 ± 10.3 years) with normal cardiac function underwent annual blood pressure measurements over 5 years. VVV-SBP was assessed using both the SD and the coefficient of variation (CV) of SBP, calculated from five BP measurements taken annually during the 5 years prior to the P-SAECG. P-SAECG parameters included the filtered P-wave duration (FPD) and the root-mean-square voltage of the last 20 ms of the P-wave (RMS20). ALP positivity was defined as FPD > 120 ms and RMS20 < 3.5 µV.
Results: ALP positivity was observed in 33 participants (25.8%). SD-SBP was higher in the ALP-positive group (9.59 ± 4.15 vs. 7.92 ± 3.66 mmHg; P = 0.031). This trend was seen in CV-SBP (ALP-positive; 0.077 ± 0.031 vs. ALP-negative; 0.064 ± 0.027; P = 0.022). ALP positivity was significantly less frequent in the lowest quartile and more frequent in the highest quartile of both SD-SBP and CV-SBP. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, higher quartiles of both SD-SBP and CV-SBP were independently associated with ALP positivity (e.g. SD-4; P = 0.014; CV-4; P = 0.009).
Conclusion: Elevated VVV-SBP, assessed by SD and CV, is associated with impaired atrial conduction, highlighting its potential role as a predictor of atrial conduction abnormalities and a tool for AF risk stratification.
期刊介绍:
Blood Pressure Monitoring is devoted to original research in blood pressure measurement and blood pressure variability. It includes device technology, analytical methodology of blood pressure over time and its variability, clinical trials - including, but not limited to, pharmacology - involving blood pressure monitoring, blood pressure reactivity, patient evaluation, and outcomes and effectiveness research.
This innovative journal contains papers dealing with all aspects of manual, automated, and ambulatory monitoring. Basic and clinical science papers are considered although the emphasis is on clinical medicine.
Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.