结合源识别与风险评估揭示农业湖泊空间风险格局。

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125966
Jiaxun Guo, Yu Xie, Xuekai Dou, Weixiao Qi, Yunjie Liao, Xiaofeng Cao, Jianfeng Peng, Huijuan Liu
{"title":"结合源识别与风险评估揭示农业湖泊空间风险格局。","authors":"Jiaxun Guo, Yu Xie, Xuekai Dou, Weixiao Qi, Yunjie Liao, Xiaofeng Cao, Jianfeng Peng, Huijuan Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pollutant source identification and risk assessment underpin environmental management, necessitating innovative methods for both pollution source identification and comprehensive evaluation to enhance management efficiency. In this study, we developed a novel integrated framework that combines Bayesian isotope mixing, positive matrix factorization (PMF), random forest, and spatial autocorrelation for multi-pollutant source identification and risk assessment. The Bayesian isotope mixing model revealed that fertilizers accounted for 61 % of the nitrate in the lake and 46 % of the nitrate in the river. Furthermore, PMF analysis indicated that polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sediments and soil were primarily sourced from vehicular emissions (32 %), while heavy metals (40 %) were mainly from vehicular emissions and agricultural activities. Using a comprehensive pollution assessment framework for water and sediment quality, we found that water quality ranged from \"medium\" to \"excellent\", and sediment quality ranged from \"good\" to \"excellent\". Among various evaluation indices, COD<sub>Mn</sub>, As, F<sup>-</sup>, TP, Pb, and Zn were pivotal in determining comprehensive water quality. Key indices for sediment quality evaluation included Flua, BaP, BaA, Pyr, Ant, Pb, and As, primarily sourced from automobile emissions and agricultural activities. Spatial autocorrelation analysis demonstrated a spatial relationship between water quality and sediment quality, covering 43 % of the area. High-pollution areas (13 %) were concentrated around natural river inlets, while low-pollution zones (17 %) were located near ecological water replenishment river inlets. This underscores the significant influence of inflowing water quality on sediment conditions. This study highlights the development of a comprehensive pollution assessment framework to evaluate sediment and soil pollution, as well as to identify high-risk zones of compound pollution in water and sediment. Furthermore, the framework's universal applicability for agricultural lake systems enables the identification of high-risk zones through water-sediment interaction analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"387 ","pages":"125966"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining source identification and risk assessment to uncover spatial risk patterns in an agricultural lake.\",\"authors\":\"Jiaxun Guo, Yu Xie, Xuekai Dou, Weixiao Qi, Yunjie Liao, Xiaofeng Cao, Jianfeng Peng, Huijuan Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pollutant source identification and risk assessment underpin environmental management, necessitating innovative methods for both pollution source identification and comprehensive evaluation to enhance management efficiency. In this study, we developed a novel integrated framework that combines Bayesian isotope mixing, positive matrix factorization (PMF), random forest, and spatial autocorrelation for multi-pollutant source identification and risk assessment. The Bayesian isotope mixing model revealed that fertilizers accounted for 61 % of the nitrate in the lake and 46 % of the nitrate in the river. Furthermore, PMF analysis indicated that polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sediments and soil were primarily sourced from vehicular emissions (32 %), while heavy metals (40 %) were mainly from vehicular emissions and agricultural activities. Using a comprehensive pollution assessment framework for water and sediment quality, we found that water quality ranged from \\\"medium\\\" to \\\"excellent\\\", and sediment quality ranged from \\\"good\\\" to \\\"excellent\\\". Among various evaluation indices, COD<sub>Mn</sub>, As, F<sup>-</sup>, TP, Pb, and Zn were pivotal in determining comprehensive water quality. Key indices for sediment quality evaluation included Flua, BaP, BaA, Pyr, Ant, Pb, and As, primarily sourced from automobile emissions and agricultural activities. Spatial autocorrelation analysis demonstrated a spatial relationship between water quality and sediment quality, covering 43 % of the area. High-pollution areas (13 %) were concentrated around natural river inlets, while low-pollution zones (17 %) were located near ecological water replenishment river inlets. This underscores the significant influence of inflowing water quality on sediment conditions. This study highlights the development of a comprehensive pollution assessment framework to evaluate sediment and soil pollution, as well as to identify high-risk zones of compound pollution in water and sediment. Furthermore, the framework's universal applicability for agricultural lake systems enables the identification of high-risk zones through water-sediment interaction analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"387 \",\"pages\":\"125966\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125966\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125966","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

污染源识别和风险评估是环境管理的基础,需要创新污染源识别和综合评价方法,以提高管理效率。在这项研究中,我们开发了一个新的集成框架,结合贝叶斯同位素混合、正矩阵分解(PMF)、随机森林和空间自相关,用于多污染源识别和风险评估。贝叶斯同位素混合模型显示,肥料占湖泊硝酸盐的61%,占河流硝酸盐的46%。此外,PMF分析表明,沉积物和土壤中的多环芳烃(PAHs)主要来自车辆排放(32%),而重金属(40%)主要来自车辆排放和农业活动。采用水沙质量综合污染评价框架,水质范围从“中等”到“优良”,沉积物质量范围从“良好”到“优良”。在各种评价指标中,CODMn、As、F-、TP、Pb和Zn是决定综合水质的关键指标。沉积物质量评价的关键指标包括Flua、BaP、BaA、Pyr、Ant、Pb和As,主要来源于汽车排放和农业活动。空间自相关分析表明,水质与沉积物质量之间存在空间关系,覆盖面积达43%。高污染区(13%)集中在天然河流入海口附近,低污染区(17%)集中在生态补给河流入海口附近。这强调了入流水质对泥沙条件的重要影响。这项研究强调了综合污染评估框架的发展,以评估沉积物和土壤污染,并确定水和沉积物复合污染的高风险区域。此外,该框架对农业湖泊系统的普遍适用性使其能够通过水-沉积物相互作用分析来识别高风险区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combining source identification and risk assessment to uncover spatial risk patterns in an agricultural lake.

Pollutant source identification and risk assessment underpin environmental management, necessitating innovative methods for both pollution source identification and comprehensive evaluation to enhance management efficiency. In this study, we developed a novel integrated framework that combines Bayesian isotope mixing, positive matrix factorization (PMF), random forest, and spatial autocorrelation for multi-pollutant source identification and risk assessment. The Bayesian isotope mixing model revealed that fertilizers accounted for 61 % of the nitrate in the lake and 46 % of the nitrate in the river. Furthermore, PMF analysis indicated that polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sediments and soil were primarily sourced from vehicular emissions (32 %), while heavy metals (40 %) were mainly from vehicular emissions and agricultural activities. Using a comprehensive pollution assessment framework for water and sediment quality, we found that water quality ranged from "medium" to "excellent", and sediment quality ranged from "good" to "excellent". Among various evaluation indices, CODMn, As, F-, TP, Pb, and Zn were pivotal in determining comprehensive water quality. Key indices for sediment quality evaluation included Flua, BaP, BaA, Pyr, Ant, Pb, and As, primarily sourced from automobile emissions and agricultural activities. Spatial autocorrelation analysis demonstrated a spatial relationship between water quality and sediment quality, covering 43 % of the area. High-pollution areas (13 %) were concentrated around natural river inlets, while low-pollution zones (17 %) were located near ecological water replenishment river inlets. This underscores the significant influence of inflowing water quality on sediment conditions. This study highlights the development of a comprehensive pollution assessment framework to evaluate sediment and soil pollution, as well as to identify high-risk zones of compound pollution in water and sediment. Furthermore, the framework's universal applicability for agricultural lake systems enables the identification of high-risk zones through water-sediment interaction analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信