第一次全球封城期间远程办公对工作压力和家庭压力的影响——国际COVISTRESS研究

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Sébastien Couarraze, Guillaume Decormeille, Louis Delamarre, Fouad Marhar, Karen Gbaglo, Raimundo Avilès Dorlhiac, Mickael Berthon, Andy Su-I Liu, Samuel Antunes, Bruno Pereira, Julien S Baker, Morteza Charkhabi, Ukadike C Ugbolue, Reza Bagheri, José J. Gil-Cosano, Marek Zak, The COVISTRESS Network, Maëlys Clinchamps, Frédéric Dutheil
{"title":"第一次全球封城期间远程办公对工作压力和家庭压力的影响——国际COVISTRESS研究","authors":"Sébastien Couarraze,&nbsp;Guillaume Decormeille,&nbsp;Louis Delamarre,&nbsp;Fouad Marhar,&nbsp;Karen Gbaglo,&nbsp;Raimundo Avilès Dorlhiac,&nbsp;Mickael Berthon,&nbsp;Andy Su-I Liu,&nbsp;Samuel Antunes,&nbsp;Bruno Pereira,&nbsp;Julien S Baker,&nbsp;Morteza Charkhabi,&nbsp;Ukadike C Ugbolue,&nbsp;Reza Bagheri,&nbsp;José J. Gil-Cosano,&nbsp;Marek Zak,&nbsp;The COVISTRESS Network,&nbsp;Maëlys Clinchamps,&nbsp;Frédéric Dutheil","doi":"10.1002/brb3.70592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The initial lockdown during the pandemic of COVID-19 led to adjustments in working conditions, including extensive use of telecommuting whenever possible, putatively influencing both work-related and home-related stress.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Our aim was to measure the impact of teleworking on work-related and home-related during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The international study was conducted using an online questionnaire to collect demographic and stress-related data from individuals worldwide during the 2020 pandemic year. Work-related and home-related stress levels were evaluated using an uncalibrated visual analog scale, with a range from 0 (none) to 100 (maximum).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 13,537 individuals from 44 countries completed the survey between January and June 2020. A total of 7356 individuals were engaged in professional activities. Of these, 6639 continued to work, of which 2573 carried on as usual and 4066 teleworked. The teleworkers demonstrated a considerably (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) lower level of work-related stress (58 ± 31.6) in comparison to those who maintained their usual work schedule (63.6 ± 31.1). However, there was no statistically significant variation in home-related stress between the two groups. The risk of high levels of work-related stress (stress &gt; 80) was multiplied by 1.76 in women (1.54 to 2.01; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), by 1.43 (1.27 to 1.61; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) for those who did not telework, by 5.31 (4.57 to 6.18; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) for those with high levels of home-related stress (stress &gt; 80), and by 1.46 (1.22 to 1.76; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) for those from continents outside Europe. Home-related stress is also a risk factor for work-related stress, and vice versa. Sociodemographic risk factors for higher levels of home-related stress were age &lt; 50 years old, women, working &lt; 50 h per week, continents outside Europe, and not teleworking were no longer risk factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Telework emerged as a viable option during the initial phase of the global pandemic. This mode of work was associated with lower levels of work-related stress compared to workers who were required to work in a conventional manner. In terms of home-related stress, telecommuters experienced more stress than those who continued to work as usual.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9081,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Behavior","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brb3.70592","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Teleworking on Work-Related and Home-Related Stress at During the First Global Lockdown–The International COVISTRESS Study\",\"authors\":\"Sébastien Couarraze,&nbsp;Guillaume Decormeille,&nbsp;Louis Delamarre,&nbsp;Fouad Marhar,&nbsp;Karen Gbaglo,&nbsp;Raimundo Avilès Dorlhiac,&nbsp;Mickael Berthon,&nbsp;Andy Su-I Liu,&nbsp;Samuel Antunes,&nbsp;Bruno Pereira,&nbsp;Julien S Baker,&nbsp;Morteza Charkhabi,&nbsp;Ukadike C Ugbolue,&nbsp;Reza Bagheri,&nbsp;José J. Gil-Cosano,&nbsp;Marek Zak,&nbsp;The COVISTRESS Network,&nbsp;Maëlys Clinchamps,&nbsp;Frédéric Dutheil\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/brb3.70592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The initial lockdown during the pandemic of COVID-19 led to adjustments in working conditions, including extensive use of telecommuting whenever possible, putatively influencing both work-related and home-related stress.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our aim was to measure the impact of teleworking on work-related and home-related during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The international study was conducted using an online questionnaire to collect demographic and stress-related data from individuals worldwide during the 2020 pandemic year. Work-related and home-related stress levels were evaluated using an uncalibrated visual analog scale, with a range from 0 (none) to 100 (maximum).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 13,537 individuals from 44 countries completed the survey between January and June 2020. A total of 7356 individuals were engaged in professional activities. Of these, 6639 continued to work, of which 2573 carried on as usual and 4066 teleworked. The teleworkers demonstrated a considerably (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) lower level of work-related stress (58 ± 31.6) in comparison to those who maintained their usual work schedule (63.6 ± 31.1). However, there was no statistically significant variation in home-related stress between the two groups. The risk of high levels of work-related stress (stress &gt; 80) was multiplied by 1.76 in women (1.54 to 2.01; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), by 1.43 (1.27 to 1.61; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) for those who did not telework, by 5.31 (4.57 to 6.18; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) for those with high levels of home-related stress (stress &gt; 80), and by 1.46 (1.22 to 1.76; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) for those from continents outside Europe. Home-related stress is also a risk factor for work-related stress, and vice versa. Sociodemographic risk factors for higher levels of home-related stress were age &lt; 50 years old, women, working &lt; 50 h per week, continents outside Europe, and not teleworking were no longer risk factors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Telework emerged as a viable option during the initial phase of the global pandemic. This mode of work was associated with lower levels of work-related stress compared to workers who were required to work in a conventional manner. In terms of home-related stress, telecommuters experienced more stress than those who continued to work as usual.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brb3.70592\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70592\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70592","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19大流行期间的最初封锁导致了工作条件的调整,包括尽可能广泛使用远程办公,这可能会影响与工作有关的压力和与家庭有关的压力。我们的目的是衡量在COVID-19大流行期间远程办公对工作相关和家庭相关的影响。方法采用在线问卷方式进行国际研究,收集2020年大流行年全球个人的人口统计和压力相关数据。使用未校准的视觉模拟量表评估工作相关和家庭相关的压力水平,范围从0(无)到100(最大)。结果来自44个国家的13537人在2020年1月至6月期间完成了调查。共有7356人从事专业活动。其中,6639人继续工作,其中2573人照常工作,4066人远程工作。远程工作者表现出相当大的(p <;0.001)工作压力水平(58±31.6)低于保持正常工作时间表的人(63.6±31.1)。然而,两组在家庭相关压力方面没有统计学上的显著差异。高水平工作压力的风险(stress >;80),女性乘以1.76(1.54至2.01;p & lt;0.001), 1.43 (1.27 - 1.61;p & lt;0.001),由5.31(4.57至6.18;p & lt;0.001),对于那些家庭相关压力高的人(压力>;80)和1.46(从1.22到1.76;p & lt;0.001)。与家庭有关的压力也是工作压力的一个风险因素,反之亦然。家庭相关压力较高的社会人口学危险因素为年龄和年龄;50岁,女性,工作&;每周50小时,欧洲以外的大陆,不远程工作不再是风险因素。在全球大流行的初始阶段,远程工作成为一种可行的选择。与按传统方式工作的工人相比,这种工作模式的工作压力水平较低。在与家庭有关的压力方面,远程办公者比那些继续正常工作的人承受更大的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of Teleworking on Work-Related and Home-Related Stress at During the First Global Lockdown–The International COVISTRESS Study

Impact of Teleworking on Work-Related and Home-Related Stress at During the First Global Lockdown–The International COVISTRESS Study

Background

The initial lockdown during the pandemic of COVID-19 led to adjustments in working conditions, including extensive use of telecommuting whenever possible, putatively influencing both work-related and home-related stress.

Objectives

Our aim was to measure the impact of teleworking on work-related and home-related during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

The international study was conducted using an online questionnaire to collect demographic and stress-related data from individuals worldwide during the 2020 pandemic year. Work-related and home-related stress levels were evaluated using an uncalibrated visual analog scale, with a range from 0 (none) to 100 (maximum).

Results

A total of 13,537 individuals from 44 countries completed the survey between January and June 2020. A total of 7356 individuals were engaged in professional activities. Of these, 6639 continued to work, of which 2573 carried on as usual and 4066 teleworked. The teleworkers demonstrated a considerably (p < 0.001) lower level of work-related stress (58 ± 31.6) in comparison to those who maintained their usual work schedule (63.6 ± 31.1). However, there was no statistically significant variation in home-related stress between the two groups. The risk of high levels of work-related stress (stress > 80) was multiplied by 1.76 in women (1.54 to 2.01; p < 0.001), by 1.43 (1.27 to 1.61; p < 0.001) for those who did not telework, by 5.31 (4.57 to 6.18; p < 0.001) for those with high levels of home-related stress (stress > 80), and by 1.46 (1.22 to 1.76; p < 0.001) for those from continents outside Europe. Home-related stress is also a risk factor for work-related stress, and vice versa. Sociodemographic risk factors for higher levels of home-related stress were age < 50 years old, women, working < 50 h per week, continents outside Europe, and not teleworking were no longer risk factors.

Conclusion

Telework emerged as a viable option during the initial phase of the global pandemic. This mode of work was associated with lower levels of work-related stress compared to workers who were required to work in a conventional manner. In terms of home-related stress, telecommuters experienced more stress than those who continued to work as usual.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain and Behavior
Brain and Behavior BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
352
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain and Behavior is supported by other journals published by Wiley, including a number of society-owned journals. The journals listed below support Brain and Behavior and participate in the Manuscript Transfer Program by referring articles of suitable quality and offering authors the option to have their paper, with any peer review reports, automatically transferred to Brain and Behavior. * [Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica](https://publons.com/journal/1366/acta-psychiatrica-scandinavica) * [Addiction Biology](https://publons.com/journal/1523/addiction-biology) * [Aggressive Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/3611/aggressive-behavior) * [Brain Pathology](https://publons.com/journal/1787/brain-pathology) * [Child: Care, Health and Development](https://publons.com/journal/6111/child-care-health-and-development) * [Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health](https://publons.com/journal/3839/criminal-behaviour-and-mental-health) * [Depression and Anxiety](https://publons.com/journal/1528/depression-and-anxiety) * Developmental Neurobiology * [Developmental Science](https://publons.com/journal/1069/developmental-science) * [European Journal of Neuroscience](https://publons.com/journal/1441/european-journal-of-neuroscience) * [Genes, Brain and Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1635/genes-brain-and-behavior) * [GLIA](https://publons.com/journal/1287/glia) * [Hippocampus](https://publons.com/journal/1056/hippocampus) * [Human Brain Mapping](https://publons.com/journal/500/human-brain-mapping) * [Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour](https://publons.com/journal/7330/journal-for-the-theory-of-social-behaviour) * [Journal of Comparative Neurology](https://publons.com/journal/1306/journal-of-comparative-neurology) * [Journal of Neuroimaging](https://publons.com/journal/6379/journal-of-neuroimaging) * [Journal of Neuroscience Research](https://publons.com/journal/2778/journal-of-neuroscience-research) * [Journal of Organizational Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1123/journal-of-organizational-behavior) * [Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System](https://publons.com/journal/3929/journal-of-the-peripheral-nervous-system) * [Muscle & Nerve](https://publons.com/journal/4448/muscle-and-nerve) * [Neural Pathology and Applied Neurobiology](https://publons.com/journal/2401/neuropathology-and-applied-neurobiology)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信