{"title":"以视觉凝视模式回顾手术对提高内镜下粘膜剥离技能的影响","authors":"Huy Thanh Dang, Fumiaki Ishibashi, Kosuke Okusa, Kentaro Mochida, Takao Tonishi, Sho Suzuki","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.70193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>No previous studies have reported on whether tracking and reviewing physicians' gaze patterns affect the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) training process. This study investigated differences in physicians' gaze patterns during ESD and assessed how reviewing their procedure afterward impacted ESD skills.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\n \n <p>The gazing points of three trainees during mucosal incision, submucosal dissection, and hemostasis were captured and recorded using the eye-tracking device. Fifteen short video clips were created from six recorded videos. Three trainees and two expert endoscopists later reviewed these video clips. Key outcomes included: (1) time spent gazing at the appropriate mucosal incision direction, (2) time spent gazing at the appropriate submucosal dissection line, and (3) time required to identify bleeding points. During video review, the trainees spent significantly more time fixating on the appropriate mucosal incision direction than during live performance (24.9 s vs. 6.4 s, <i>p</i> < 0.01). However, this was still shorter than expert reviewers (28.4 s, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Similarly, the trainees spent more time observing the appropriate submucosal dissection line during review than in real-time (12.9 s vs. 4.8 s, <i>p</i> < 0.05), with no significant difference compared to the experts (14.6 s, <i>p</i> = 0.66). However, there was no significant difference in time to identify the bleeding point between review and real-time performance (9.3 s vs. 11.4 s, <i>p</i> = 1.00).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This pilot study suggests that video-based review with eye-tracking feedback may help trainees adopt expert-like visual strategies during ESD, potentially enhancing procedural performance.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"9 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgh3.70193","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Reviewing Procedure With Visual Gaze Patterns on Improving Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Skills\",\"authors\":\"Huy Thanh Dang, Fumiaki Ishibashi, Kosuke Okusa, Kentaro Mochida, Takao Tonishi, Sho Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgh3.70193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>No previous studies have reported on whether tracking and reviewing physicians' gaze patterns affect the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) training process. This study investigated differences in physicians' gaze patterns during ESD and assessed how reviewing their procedure afterward impacted ESD skills.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The gazing points of three trainees during mucosal incision, submucosal dissection, and hemostasis were captured and recorded using the eye-tracking device. Fifteen short video clips were created from six recorded videos. Three trainees and two expert endoscopists later reviewed these video clips. Key outcomes included: (1) time spent gazing at the appropriate mucosal incision direction, (2) time spent gazing at the appropriate submucosal dissection line, and (3) time required to identify bleeding points. During video review, the trainees spent significantly more time fixating on the appropriate mucosal incision direction than during live performance (24.9 s vs. 6.4 s, <i>p</i> < 0.01). However, this was still shorter than expert reviewers (28.4 s, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Similarly, the trainees spent more time observing the appropriate submucosal dissection line during review than in real-time (12.9 s vs. 4.8 s, <i>p</i> < 0.05), with no significant difference compared to the experts (14.6 s, <i>p</i> = 0.66). However, there was no significant difference in time to identify the bleeding point between review and real-time performance (9.3 s vs. 11.4 s, <i>p</i> = 1.00).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This pilot study suggests that video-based review with eye-tracking feedback may help trainees adopt expert-like visual strategies during ESD, potentially enhancing procedural performance.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JGH Open\",\"volume\":\"9 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgh3.70193\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JGH Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.70193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.70193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的追踪和回顾医生的注视模式是否影响内镜下粘膜剥离(ESD)训练过程,此前没有研究报道。本研究调查了医生在ESD过程中注视模式的差异,并评估了他们在手术后对ESD技能的影响。方法与结果采用眼动仪捕捉并记录3名受训者在粘膜切开、粘膜下剥离和止血过程中的注视点。从6个录制的视频中创建了15个短视频剪辑。三名受训者和两名内窥镜专家后来审查了这些视频片段。主要结局包括:(1)注视合适的粘膜切口方向所花费的时间;(2)注视合适的粘膜下剥离线所花费的时间;(3)识别出血点所需的时间。在视频复习中,受训者注视合适的粘膜切口方向的时间明显长于现场表演时(24.9 s vs. 6.4 s, p < 0.01)。然而,这仍然比专家审稿人短(28.4 s, p < 0.01)。同样,受训人员在复习时观察合适的粘膜下剥离线的时间比实时复习时更长(12.9 s vs. 4.8 s, p < 0.05),与专家复习时相比无显著差异(14.6 s, p = 0.66)。然而,回顾和实时表现在识别出血点的时间上没有显著差异(9.3秒vs 11.4秒,p = 1.00)。结论本初步研究表明,基于视频的眼动反馈复习可以帮助受训者在ESD过程中采用类似专家的视觉策略,从而潜在地提高程序表现。
Impact of Reviewing Procedure With Visual Gaze Patterns on Improving Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Skills
Aims
No previous studies have reported on whether tracking and reviewing physicians' gaze patterns affect the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) training process. This study investigated differences in physicians' gaze patterns during ESD and assessed how reviewing their procedure afterward impacted ESD skills.
Methods and Results
The gazing points of three trainees during mucosal incision, submucosal dissection, and hemostasis were captured and recorded using the eye-tracking device. Fifteen short video clips were created from six recorded videos. Three trainees and two expert endoscopists later reviewed these video clips. Key outcomes included: (1) time spent gazing at the appropriate mucosal incision direction, (2) time spent gazing at the appropriate submucosal dissection line, and (3) time required to identify bleeding points. During video review, the trainees spent significantly more time fixating on the appropriate mucosal incision direction than during live performance (24.9 s vs. 6.4 s, p < 0.01). However, this was still shorter than expert reviewers (28.4 s, p < 0.01). Similarly, the trainees spent more time observing the appropriate submucosal dissection line during review than in real-time (12.9 s vs. 4.8 s, p < 0.05), with no significant difference compared to the experts (14.6 s, p = 0.66). However, there was no significant difference in time to identify the bleeding point between review and real-time performance (9.3 s vs. 11.4 s, p = 1.00).
Conclusion
This pilot study suggests that video-based review with eye-tracking feedback may help trainees adopt expert-like visual strategies during ESD, potentially enhancing procedural performance.