化学和电化学混凝法三级处理生活污水中残余磷酸盐去除:运行参数的影响及运行成本的计算

IF 3.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Nawid Ahmad Akhtar, Mehmet Kobya and Erhan Gengec
{"title":"化学和电化学混凝法三级处理生活污水中残余磷酸盐去除:运行参数的影响及运行成本的计算","authors":"Nawid Ahmad Akhtar, Mehmet Kobya and Erhan Gengec","doi":"10.1039/D5EW00047E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In this study, we aimed to compare the treatment efficiency and techno-economic analysis of chemical coagulation (CC) and electrocoagulation (EC) processes for residual phosphate (PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P) removal from a secondary domestic wastewater treatment plant. The effect of two different coagulants (FeCl<small><sub>3</sub></small> and alum) and different pH values was evaluated in the CC process. On the other hand, the effect of different metal scrap anodes (Fe, Al, and hybrid Fe + Al), applied current (<em>i</em> = 0.1–0.4 A), and charge loading (<em>q</em> = C L<small><sup>−1</sup></small> or F m<small><sup>−3</sup></small>) were evaluated in the EC process. In the CC process, the highest removal efficiency of 99.7% PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P was obtained with 0.5 kg FeCl<small><sub>3</sub></small> m<small><sup>−3</sup></small> and pH = 7.5. However, in the EC process, the highest removal efficiency of 99.9% PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P was obtained with Fe scrap anodes under optimum conditions (EC time = 15 min, <em>i</em> = 0.4 A, and <em>q</em> = 6 C L<small><sup>−1</sup></small> or 3.73 F m<small><sup>−3</sup></small>). The removal capacity and metal/PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P molar ratios in the CC process were calculated as 85.7 mg PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P g<small><sup>−1</sup></small> Fe and 19.8 mol mol<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for FeCl<small><sub>3</sub></small>, and 218.9 mg PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P g<small><sup>−1</sup></small> Al and 7.7 mol mol<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for alum, respectively. On the other hand, the EC process was calculated as 85.0 mg PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P g<small><sup>−1</sup></small> Fe and 20.0 mol mol<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for Fe scrap, 132.5 mg PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P g<small><sup>−1</sup></small> Al and 26.6 mol mol<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for Al scrap, and 84.1 mg PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P g<small><sup>−1</sup></small> Fe + Al and 13.6 mol mol<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for Fe + Al scrap, respectively. At the end of the study, total operating costs ($ per m<small><sup>3</sup></small> and $ per kg PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P) were calculated for both processes. The results of the study showed that using Fe scrap anodes with the EC process for PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P removal results in higher removal efficiencies and lower operating costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":75,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","volume":" 6","pages":" 1554-1567"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chemical and electrochemical coagulation processes as a tertiary treatment for residual phosphate removal from domestic wastewater: effect of operating parameters and calculation of operating cost\",\"authors\":\"Nawid Ahmad Akhtar, Mehmet Kobya and Erhan Gengec\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D5EW00047E\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >In this study, we aimed to compare the treatment efficiency and techno-economic analysis of chemical coagulation (CC) and electrocoagulation (EC) processes for residual phosphate (PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P) removal from a secondary domestic wastewater treatment plant. The effect of two different coagulants (FeCl<small><sub>3</sub></small> and alum) and different pH values was evaluated in the CC process. On the other hand, the effect of different metal scrap anodes (Fe, Al, and hybrid Fe + Al), applied current (<em>i</em> = 0.1–0.4 A), and charge loading (<em>q</em> = C L<small><sup>−1</sup></small> or F m<small><sup>−3</sup></small>) were evaluated in the EC process. In the CC process, the highest removal efficiency of 99.7% PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P was obtained with 0.5 kg FeCl<small><sub>3</sub></small> m<small><sup>−3</sup></small> and pH = 7.5. However, in the EC process, the highest removal efficiency of 99.9% PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P was obtained with Fe scrap anodes under optimum conditions (EC time = 15 min, <em>i</em> = 0.4 A, and <em>q</em> = 6 C L<small><sup>−1</sup></small> or 3.73 F m<small><sup>−3</sup></small>). The removal capacity and metal/PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P molar ratios in the CC process were calculated as 85.7 mg PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P g<small><sup>−1</sup></small> Fe and 19.8 mol mol<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for FeCl<small><sub>3</sub></small>, and 218.9 mg PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P g<small><sup>−1</sup></small> Al and 7.7 mol mol<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for alum, respectively. On the other hand, the EC process was calculated as 85.0 mg PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P g<small><sup>−1</sup></small> Fe and 20.0 mol mol<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for Fe scrap, 132.5 mg PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P g<small><sup>−1</sup></small> Al and 26.6 mol mol<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for Al scrap, and 84.1 mg PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P g<small><sup>−1</sup></small> Fe + Al and 13.6 mol mol<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for Fe + Al scrap, respectively. At the end of the study, total operating costs ($ per m<small><sup>3</sup></small> and $ per kg PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P) were calculated for both processes. The results of the study showed that using Fe scrap anodes with the EC process for PO<small><sub>4</sub></small><small><sup>3−</sup></small>–P removal results in higher removal efficiencies and lower operating costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology\",\"volume\":\" 6\",\"pages\":\" 1554-1567\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ew/d5ew00047e\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ew/d5ew00047e","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我们旨在比较化学混凝(CC)和电混凝(EC)工艺对生活污水二级处理厂残余磷酸盐(PO43−p)的处理效率和技术经济分析。考察了两种不同混凝剂(FeCl3和明矾)和不同pH值对CC工艺的影响。另一方面,考察了不同金属废料阳极(Fe、Al和Fe + Al杂化阳极)、外加电流(i = 0.1-0.4 A)和电荷负荷(q = C L−1或F m−3)对EC过程的影响。在CC工艺中,当FeCl3 m−3为0.5 kg, pH = 7.5时,对PO43−p的去除率最高,达到99.7%。在电解时间= 15 min, i = 0.4 A, q = 6 C L−1或3.73 F m−3的条件下,废铁阳极对PO43−p的去除率最高,达到99.9%。计算出CC过程中金属/PO43−p的去除率分别为85.7 mg PO43−-P g−1 Fe和19.8 mol mol−1 FeCl3, 218.9 mg PO43−-P g−1 Al和7.7 mol mol−1明矾。废铁的EC过程为85.0 mg PO43−-P g−1 Fe和20.0 mol mol−1,废铝的EC过程为132.5 mg PO43−-P g−1 Al和26.6 mol mol−1,废铁的EC过程为84.1 mg PO43−-P g−1 Fe + Al和13.6 mol mol−1。在研究结束时,计算了两种工艺的总运行成本(每立方米$和每公斤$ PO43−p)。研究结果表明,利用废铁阳极和EC法去除PO43−p具有较高的去除效率和较低的运行成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chemical and electrochemical coagulation processes as a tertiary treatment for residual phosphate removal from domestic wastewater: effect of operating parameters and calculation of operating cost

In this study, we aimed to compare the treatment efficiency and techno-economic analysis of chemical coagulation (CC) and electrocoagulation (EC) processes for residual phosphate (PO43−–P) removal from a secondary domestic wastewater treatment plant. The effect of two different coagulants (FeCl3 and alum) and different pH values was evaluated in the CC process. On the other hand, the effect of different metal scrap anodes (Fe, Al, and hybrid Fe + Al), applied current (i = 0.1–0.4 A), and charge loading (q = C L−1 or F m−3) were evaluated in the EC process. In the CC process, the highest removal efficiency of 99.7% PO43−–P was obtained with 0.5 kg FeCl3 m−3 and pH = 7.5. However, in the EC process, the highest removal efficiency of 99.9% PO43−–P was obtained with Fe scrap anodes under optimum conditions (EC time = 15 min, i = 0.4 A, and q = 6 C L−1 or 3.73 F m−3). The removal capacity and metal/PO43−–P molar ratios in the CC process were calculated as 85.7 mg PO43−–P g−1 Fe and 19.8 mol mol−1 for FeCl3, and 218.9 mg PO43−–P g−1 Al and 7.7 mol mol−1 for alum, respectively. On the other hand, the EC process was calculated as 85.0 mg PO43−–P g−1 Fe and 20.0 mol mol−1 for Fe scrap, 132.5 mg PO43−–P g−1 Al and 26.6 mol mol−1 for Al scrap, and 84.1 mg PO43−–P g−1 Fe + Al and 13.6 mol mol−1 for Fe + Al scrap, respectively. At the end of the study, total operating costs ($ per m3 and $ per kg PO43−–P) were calculated for both processes. The results of the study showed that using Fe scrap anodes with the EC process for PO43−–P removal results in higher removal efficiencies and lower operating costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL SC-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
206
期刊介绍: Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology seeks to showcase high quality research about fundamental science, innovative technologies, and management practices that promote sustainable water.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信