企业主导的可负担能源方法:在达累斯萨拉姆使用液化石油气烹饪的即用即付(PayGo)的优点和局限性

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Kirsten Ulsrud , Mikkel Vindegg , Lars Kåre Grimsby , Borgar Aamaas
{"title":"企业主导的可负担能源方法:在达累斯萨拉姆使用液化石油气烹饪的即用即付(PayGo)的优点和局限性","authors":"Kirsten Ulsrud ,&nbsp;Mikkel Vindegg ,&nbsp;Lars Kåre Grimsby ,&nbsp;Borgar Aamaas","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pay-as-you-go (PayGo) business models are promoted as win-win solutions for doing good and making profit, to enable affordable access to energy for all through private sector-led energy solutions in developing countries. Inspired by PayGo for solar electricity, PayGo for Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) has been developed to improve the affordability of cooking with gas to replace the use of charcoal. This study investigates how PayGo contributes to affordability of LPG in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and how the characteristics of this energy provision enable or constrain affordability. The analysis also compares PayGo LPG with the further developed PayGo solar business models, and builds on the literature on the private sector's role in providing infrastructure in the Global South. Through mixed methods with an emphasis on qualitative interviews, we elaborate on understandings of affordability. We show that affordability, which intuitively is associated with quantitative methods and economic approaches, can be better understood when also investigated through qualitative research. Empirically, we show that PayGo LPG contributes to affordability but is far from affordable for all and faces similar limitations as PayGo solar in making a profitable business and fulfilling investors' high expectations while simultaneously reaching the large number of people who live in poverty. In policy-making on cooking solutions, PayGo LPG may nevertheless contribute as part of an energy mix. The study provides relevant insights for other urban and peri-urban areas in Sub-Saharan Africa with similar challenges and opportunities on energy for cooking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 104155"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate-led approaches to affordable energy: the advantages and limitations of pay-as-you-go (PayGo) for cooking with LPG in Dar Es Salaam\",\"authors\":\"Kirsten Ulsrud ,&nbsp;Mikkel Vindegg ,&nbsp;Lars Kåre Grimsby ,&nbsp;Borgar Aamaas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Pay-as-you-go (PayGo) business models are promoted as win-win solutions for doing good and making profit, to enable affordable access to energy for all through private sector-led energy solutions in developing countries. Inspired by PayGo for solar electricity, PayGo for Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) has been developed to improve the affordability of cooking with gas to replace the use of charcoal. This study investigates how PayGo contributes to affordability of LPG in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and how the characteristics of this energy provision enable or constrain affordability. The analysis also compares PayGo LPG with the further developed PayGo solar business models, and builds on the literature on the private sector's role in providing infrastructure in the Global South. Through mixed methods with an emphasis on qualitative interviews, we elaborate on understandings of affordability. We show that affordability, which intuitively is associated with quantitative methods and economic approaches, can be better understood when also investigated through qualitative research. Empirically, we show that PayGo LPG contributes to affordability but is far from affordable for all and faces similar limitations as PayGo solar in making a profitable business and fulfilling investors' high expectations while simultaneously reaching the large number of people who live in poverty. In policy-making on cooking solutions, PayGo LPG may nevertheless contribute as part of an energy mix. The study provides relevant insights for other urban and peri-urban areas in Sub-Saharan Africa with similar challenges and opportunities on energy for cooking.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"126 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002361\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002361","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现收现付(PayGo)商业模式被推广为行善和盈利的双赢解决方案,通过私营部门主导的能源解决方案,使发展中国家的所有人都能负担得起能源。受PayGo太阳能发电的启发,PayGo液化石油气(LPG)被开发出来,以提高用燃气代替木炭烹饪的可负担性。本研究调查了PayGo如何促进坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆液化石油气的可负担性,以及这种能源供应的特点如何促进或限制可负担性。该分析还比较了PayGo液化石油气与PayGo太阳能商业模式的进一步发展,并以私营部门在全球南方提供基础设施方面的作用为基础。通过强调定性访谈的混合方法,我们阐述了对负担能力的理解。我们表明,直观地与定量方法和经济方法相关的可负担性,在通过定性研究进行调查时可以更好地理解。我们的经验表明,PayGo液化石油气有助于提高人们的负担能力,但远不是所有人都能负担得起,在盈利和满足投资者的高期望方面,它面临着与PayGo太阳能类似的限制,同时还能惠及大量生活在贫困中的人。在烹饪解决方案的决策中,PayGo液化石油气可能会作为能源组合的一部分做出贡献。该研究为撒哈拉以南非洲其他城市和城郊地区提供了相关的见解,这些地区在烹饪能源方面面临着类似的挑战和机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corporate-led approaches to affordable energy: the advantages and limitations of pay-as-you-go (PayGo) for cooking with LPG in Dar Es Salaam
Pay-as-you-go (PayGo) business models are promoted as win-win solutions for doing good and making profit, to enable affordable access to energy for all through private sector-led energy solutions in developing countries. Inspired by PayGo for solar electricity, PayGo for Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) has been developed to improve the affordability of cooking with gas to replace the use of charcoal. This study investigates how PayGo contributes to affordability of LPG in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and how the characteristics of this energy provision enable or constrain affordability. The analysis also compares PayGo LPG with the further developed PayGo solar business models, and builds on the literature on the private sector's role in providing infrastructure in the Global South. Through mixed methods with an emphasis on qualitative interviews, we elaborate on understandings of affordability. We show that affordability, which intuitively is associated with quantitative methods and economic approaches, can be better understood when also investigated through qualitative research. Empirically, we show that PayGo LPG contributes to affordability but is far from affordable for all and faces similar limitations as PayGo solar in making a profitable business and fulfilling investors' high expectations while simultaneously reaching the large number of people who live in poverty. In policy-making on cooking solutions, PayGo LPG may nevertheless contribute as part of an energy mix. The study provides relevant insights for other urban and peri-urban areas in Sub-Saharan Africa with similar challenges and opportunities on energy for cooking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信