{"title":"一勺心力衰竭资源帮助医学单位再入院率下降","authors":"Joseph Armitage (he/him/his) MSN, RN, CHFN, Melissa Wenzel BSN, RN, CCRN, Kathryn Arkin RN, BSN, Corrine Benacka MSN, CCRN, Jane Wilcox MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hrtlng.2025.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Heart failure is the leading cause of hospitalization in the United States and is associated with increased mortality, imposed stress on patients, and financial/capacity burdens on health care systems (AHA, 2022).</div><div>Medicine units were experiencing 30-day heart failure readmission rates above the hospital benchmark of 15.8%. Medicine units had higher rates of readmissions than the cardiac units for the heart failure population. A gap analysis found these units were lacking evidence-based strategies for patients admitted with heart failure.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The performance improvement project aimed to evaluate effectiveness of specific interventions designed to reduce heart failure 30-day readmission rates on non-cardiac medicine units. The goal was to reduce readmissions in these areas through implementing the Heart Failure Bundle; a series of targeted strategies that includes patient education, scheduling follow up appointments within 7-10 days prior to discharge, providing scales and post discharge callbacks.</div></div><div><h3>Setting/Population</h3><div>The medicine units in a large, urban academic medical center in Chicago, Illinois. The population included adults with heart failure admitted inpatient or observation regardless of diagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Method/Process</h3><div>The heart failure team met with the medicine nursing and physician leadership division to share readmission data and analyze root causes for heart failure re-admissions. A full-time heart failure nurse navigator was dedicated to the medicine units to assist in implementation of the bundle. The navigator met with each unit, identified unit specific needs, attended interdisciplinary rounds and quality meetings, and educated staff members. The navigator began meeting with patients to provide comprehensive heart failure education and issue home scales, escalating care to specialized Cardiology services when indicated, and coordinating transitions of care.</div></div><div><h3>Outcome Measures</h3><div>The hospital's benchmark for heart failure readmissions is 15.8%. All cause, unplanned 30-day heart failure readmissions were measured pre and post intervention. On the pilot unit, heart failure readmissions were reduced from a pre-intervention 6-month average of 21.2% to a post intervention 6-month average of 10.6%.</div><div>The pre-intervention 6-month average of the remaining units was 21.46%. Five months post intervention, the remaining units showed a decrease in average readmission rate to 12.3%.</div></div><div><h3>Practical Implications</h3><div>The team identified that heart failure readmissions occurring in non-cardiac areas were not meeting benchmark and having an overall impact on the hospital's readmission rate.</div><div>Designating a heart failure navigator to execute the evidence-based bundle that proved successful on cardiac units could also be implemented on medicine units. Allocating described resources to these non-cardiac units and identifying process gaps helped the team focus interventions and address the needs of heart failure patients regardless of location throughout the hospital.</div><div>Identifying variations in heart failure management for inpatients and allocating resources to non-cardiac areas allowed the team to focus efforts in a targeted and meaningful way. These efforts have shown to improve 30-day readmissions and positively impact the heart failure population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55064,"journal":{"name":"Heart & Lung","volume":"72 ","pages":"Pages 103-104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Spoonful of Heart Failure Resources Helps the Medicine Units Readmission Rates Go Down\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Armitage (he/him/his) MSN, RN, CHFN, Melissa Wenzel BSN, RN, CCRN, Kathryn Arkin RN, BSN, Corrine Benacka MSN, CCRN, Jane Wilcox MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hrtlng.2025.04.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Heart failure is the leading cause of hospitalization in the United States and is associated with increased mortality, imposed stress on patients, and financial/capacity burdens on health care systems (AHA, 2022).</div><div>Medicine units were experiencing 30-day heart failure readmission rates above the hospital benchmark of 15.8%. Medicine units had higher rates of readmissions than the cardiac units for the heart failure population. A gap analysis found these units were lacking evidence-based strategies for patients admitted with heart failure.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The performance improvement project aimed to evaluate effectiveness of specific interventions designed to reduce heart failure 30-day readmission rates on non-cardiac medicine units. The goal was to reduce readmissions in these areas through implementing the Heart Failure Bundle; a series of targeted strategies that includes patient education, scheduling follow up appointments within 7-10 days prior to discharge, providing scales and post discharge callbacks.</div></div><div><h3>Setting/Population</h3><div>The medicine units in a large, urban academic medical center in Chicago, Illinois. The population included adults with heart failure admitted inpatient or observation regardless of diagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Method/Process</h3><div>The heart failure team met with the medicine nursing and physician leadership division to share readmission data and analyze root causes for heart failure re-admissions. A full-time heart failure nurse navigator was dedicated to the medicine units to assist in implementation of the bundle. The navigator met with each unit, identified unit specific needs, attended interdisciplinary rounds and quality meetings, and educated staff members. The navigator began meeting with patients to provide comprehensive heart failure education and issue home scales, escalating care to specialized Cardiology services when indicated, and coordinating transitions of care.</div></div><div><h3>Outcome Measures</h3><div>The hospital's benchmark for heart failure readmissions is 15.8%. All cause, unplanned 30-day heart failure readmissions were measured pre and post intervention. On the pilot unit, heart failure readmissions were reduced from a pre-intervention 6-month average of 21.2% to a post intervention 6-month average of 10.6%.</div><div>The pre-intervention 6-month average of the remaining units was 21.46%. Five months post intervention, the remaining units showed a decrease in average readmission rate to 12.3%.</div></div><div><h3>Practical Implications</h3><div>The team identified that heart failure readmissions occurring in non-cardiac areas were not meeting benchmark and having an overall impact on the hospital's readmission rate.</div><div>Designating a heart failure navigator to execute the evidence-based bundle that proved successful on cardiac units could also be implemented on medicine units. Allocating described resources to these non-cardiac units and identifying process gaps helped the team focus interventions and address the needs of heart failure patients regardless of location throughout the hospital.</div><div>Identifying variations in heart failure management for inpatients and allocating resources to non-cardiac areas allowed the team to focus efforts in a targeted and meaningful way. These efforts have shown to improve 30-day readmissions and positively impact the heart failure population.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart & Lung\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 103-104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart & Lung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147956325000767\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart & Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147956325000767","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Spoonful of Heart Failure Resources Helps the Medicine Units Readmission Rates Go Down
Background
Heart failure is the leading cause of hospitalization in the United States and is associated with increased mortality, imposed stress on patients, and financial/capacity burdens on health care systems (AHA, 2022).
Medicine units were experiencing 30-day heart failure readmission rates above the hospital benchmark of 15.8%. Medicine units had higher rates of readmissions than the cardiac units for the heart failure population. A gap analysis found these units were lacking evidence-based strategies for patients admitted with heart failure.
Purpose
The performance improvement project aimed to evaluate effectiveness of specific interventions designed to reduce heart failure 30-day readmission rates on non-cardiac medicine units. The goal was to reduce readmissions in these areas through implementing the Heart Failure Bundle; a series of targeted strategies that includes patient education, scheduling follow up appointments within 7-10 days prior to discharge, providing scales and post discharge callbacks.
Setting/Population
The medicine units in a large, urban academic medical center in Chicago, Illinois. The population included adults with heart failure admitted inpatient or observation regardless of diagnosis.
Method/Process
The heart failure team met with the medicine nursing and physician leadership division to share readmission data and analyze root causes for heart failure re-admissions. A full-time heart failure nurse navigator was dedicated to the medicine units to assist in implementation of the bundle. The navigator met with each unit, identified unit specific needs, attended interdisciplinary rounds and quality meetings, and educated staff members. The navigator began meeting with patients to provide comprehensive heart failure education and issue home scales, escalating care to specialized Cardiology services when indicated, and coordinating transitions of care.
Outcome Measures
The hospital's benchmark for heart failure readmissions is 15.8%. All cause, unplanned 30-day heart failure readmissions were measured pre and post intervention. On the pilot unit, heart failure readmissions were reduced from a pre-intervention 6-month average of 21.2% to a post intervention 6-month average of 10.6%.
The pre-intervention 6-month average of the remaining units was 21.46%. Five months post intervention, the remaining units showed a decrease in average readmission rate to 12.3%.
Practical Implications
The team identified that heart failure readmissions occurring in non-cardiac areas were not meeting benchmark and having an overall impact on the hospital's readmission rate.
Designating a heart failure navigator to execute the evidence-based bundle that proved successful on cardiac units could also be implemented on medicine units. Allocating described resources to these non-cardiac units and identifying process gaps helped the team focus interventions and address the needs of heart failure patients regardless of location throughout the hospital.
Identifying variations in heart failure management for inpatients and allocating resources to non-cardiac areas allowed the team to focus efforts in a targeted and meaningful way. These efforts have shown to improve 30-day readmissions and positively impact the heart failure population.
期刊介绍:
Heart & Lung: The Journal of Cardiopulmonary and Acute Care, the official publication of The American Association of Heart Failure Nurses, presents original, peer-reviewed articles on techniques, advances, investigations, and observations related to the care of patients with acute and critical illness and patients with chronic cardiac or pulmonary disorders.
The Journal''s acute care articles focus on the care of hospitalized patients, including those in the critical and acute care settings. Because most patients who are hospitalized in acute and critical care settings have chronic conditions, we are also interested in the chronically critically ill, the care of patients with chronic cardiopulmonary disorders, their rehabilitation, and disease prevention. The Journal''s heart failure articles focus on all aspects of the care of patients with this condition. Manuscripts that are relevant to populations across the human lifespan are welcome.