促进研究:社会学研究论文摘要修辞动作结构中蕴含的学术炒作

IF 3.1 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Zhijun Li , Jingyi Lin , Jinfen Xu
{"title":"促进研究:社会学研究论文摘要修辞动作结构中蕴含的学术炒作","authors":"Zhijun Li ,&nbsp;Jingyi Lin ,&nbsp;Jinfen Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Under the fierce competition for getting research achievements published internationally in recent decades, the abstract serves not only as a summary of the accompanying article but also markets research. This study investigates how writers promote their research in abstracts. Based on a corpus of 210 abstracts in sociology, from a diachronic perspective, we examined how the rhetorical move structure of abstracts and academic hypes embedded therein promote or embellish aspects of research. The results revealed an increasingly complex rhetorical move structure of abstracts which encompasses a growing number of promotional steps that claim the centrality of the topic, identify the research gap and state the implications or significance of the research. Academic hypes showed a dramatic rise and were dominantly embedded in the rhetorical move of research background, method and conclusion. Implications for EAP/ESP writing and pedagogy are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101535"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting research: Academic hypes embedded in the rhetorical move structure of sociology research article abstracts\",\"authors\":\"Zhijun Li ,&nbsp;Jingyi Lin ,&nbsp;Jinfen Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Under the fierce competition for getting research achievements published internationally in recent decades, the abstract serves not only as a summary of the accompanying article but also markets research. This study investigates how writers promote their research in abstracts. Based on a corpus of 210 abstracts in sociology, from a diachronic perspective, we examined how the rhetorical move structure of abstracts and academic hypes embedded therein promote or embellish aspects of research. The results revealed an increasingly complex rhetorical move structure of abstracts which encompasses a growing number of promotional steps that claim the centrality of the topic, identify the research gap and state the implications or significance of the research. Academic hypes showed a dramatic rise and were dominantly embedded in the rhetorical move of research background, method and conclusion. Implications for EAP/ESP writing and pedagogy are discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of English for Academic Purposes\",\"volume\":\"76 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101535\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of English for Academic Purposes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475158525000669\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475158525000669","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,在国际上对研究成果的激烈竞争下,摘要不仅是对相关文章的总结,而且是对市场的研究。本研究探讨作者如何在摘要中推广他们的研究。基于210篇社会学摘要的语料库,我们从历时的角度考察了摘要的修辞动作结构和其中嵌入的学术炒作如何促进或修饰研究的各个方面。结果表明,摘要的修辞动作结构日益复杂,其中包括越来越多的宣传步骤,这些步骤声称主题的中心地位,确定研究差距并说明研究的含义或意义。学术炒作急剧上升,主要体现在研究背景、研究方法和研究结论的修辞动作中。讨论了对EAP/ESP写作和教学的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Promoting research: Academic hypes embedded in the rhetorical move structure of sociology research article abstracts
Under the fierce competition for getting research achievements published internationally in recent decades, the abstract serves not only as a summary of the accompanying article but also markets research. This study investigates how writers promote their research in abstracts. Based on a corpus of 210 abstracts in sociology, from a diachronic perspective, we examined how the rhetorical move structure of abstracts and academic hypes embedded therein promote or embellish aspects of research. The results revealed an increasingly complex rhetorical move structure of abstracts which encompasses a growing number of promotional steps that claim the centrality of the topic, identify the research gap and state the implications or significance of the research. Academic hypes showed a dramatic rise and were dominantly embedded in the rhetorical move of research background, method and conclusion. Implications for EAP/ESP writing and pedagogy are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of English for Academic Purposes provides a forum for the dissemination of information and views which enables practitioners of and researchers in EAP to keep current with developments in their field and to contribute to its continued updating. JEAP publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges in the linguistic, sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic description of English as it occurs in the contexts of academic study and scholarly exchange itself.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信