作为新兴环境污染物的抗球虫离子载体抗生素的替代品

IF 6.7 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ainoa Míguez González, Andreia Oliveira Rodrigues, Raquel Cela Dablanca, Ana Barreiro, Esperanza Álvarez-Rodríguez, María J. Fernández-Sanjurjo, Avelino Núñez-Delgado
{"title":"作为新兴环境污染物的抗球虫离子载体抗生素的替代品","authors":"Ainoa Míguez González,&nbsp;Andreia Oliveira Rodrigues,&nbsp;Raquel Cela Dablanca,&nbsp;Ana Barreiro,&nbsp;Esperanza Álvarez-Rodríguez,&nbsp;María J. Fernández-Sanjurjo,&nbsp;Avelino Núñez-Delgado","doi":"10.1016/j.coesh.2025.100629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This short review/opinion text includes a selection of recently published papers dealing with environmental pollution caused by anticoccidial antibiotics (with an especial focus on ionophores) and on remediation alternatives to retain/remove these contaminants from affected areas. More in-depth details and comments are provided for those works that the authors of the review considered of higher relevance in this field. As scientific search tools, the authors used Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus. These tools provided results for selected lags of time to focus on those being more recent, as well as for not limited time periods, thus allowing both time-specific and more extended views. The overall results indicated that the assessment of environmental pollution due to anticoccidial antibiotics is an underdeveloped and emerging field of research, with many aspects still needing to be further explored and subjected to more detailed scrutiny in the coming future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52296,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100629"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternatives to face anticoccidial ionophore antibiotics as emerging environmental pollutants\",\"authors\":\"Ainoa Míguez González,&nbsp;Andreia Oliveira Rodrigues,&nbsp;Raquel Cela Dablanca,&nbsp;Ana Barreiro,&nbsp;Esperanza Álvarez-Rodríguez,&nbsp;María J. Fernández-Sanjurjo,&nbsp;Avelino Núñez-Delgado\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.coesh.2025.100629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This short review/opinion text includes a selection of recently published papers dealing with environmental pollution caused by anticoccidial antibiotics (with an especial focus on ionophores) and on remediation alternatives to retain/remove these contaminants from affected areas. More in-depth details and comments are provided for those works that the authors of the review considered of higher relevance in this field. As scientific search tools, the authors used Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus. These tools provided results for selected lags of time to focus on those being more recent, as well as for not limited time periods, thus allowing both time-specific and more extended views. The overall results indicated that the assessment of environmental pollution due to anticoccidial antibiotics is an underdeveloped and emerging field of research, with many aspects still needing to be further explored and subjected to more detailed scrutiny in the coming future.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health\",\"volume\":\"46 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100629\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468584425000388\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468584425000388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇简短的评论/意见文本包括最近发表的关于抗球虫抗生素引起的环境污染(特别关注离子载体)和从受影响地区保留/去除这些污染物的补救方法的论文。更深入的细节和评论提供了作者认为在这一领域具有较高相关性的作品。作为科学搜索工具,作者使用了谷歌Scholar、Web of Science和Scopus。这些工具为选定的滞后时间提供了结果,以关注最近的时间,以及不受时间限制的时间,从而允许特定时间和更广泛的视图。综上所述,抗球虫类抗生素的环境污染评价是一个欠发达的新兴研究领域,未来还有许多方面需要进一步探索和更细致的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alternatives to face anticoccidial ionophore antibiotics as emerging environmental pollutants
This short review/opinion text includes a selection of recently published papers dealing with environmental pollution caused by anticoccidial antibiotics (with an especial focus on ionophores) and on remediation alternatives to retain/remove these contaminants from affected areas. More in-depth details and comments are provided for those works that the authors of the review considered of higher relevance in this field. As scientific search tools, the authors used Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus. These tools provided results for selected lags of time to focus on those being more recent, as well as for not limited time periods, thus allowing both time-specific and more extended views. The overall results indicated that the assessment of environmental pollution due to anticoccidial antibiotics is an underdeveloped and emerging field of research, with many aspects still needing to be further explored and subjected to more detailed scrutiny in the coming future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health
Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
14.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
114 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信