年龄和年龄小于40岁患者的半月板同种异体移植物移植存活率和转到关节置换术:系统回顾和荟萃分析

Andrew S. Bi , Udit Dave , Trevor Poulson , Jared Rubin , Nicole Chang , Zeeshan A. Khan , Nicholas J. Lemme , Jorge Chahla , Adam B. Yanke , Brian J. Cole
{"title":"年龄和年龄小于40岁患者的半月板同种异体移植物移植存活率和转到关节置换术:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Andrew S. Bi ,&nbsp;Udit Dave ,&nbsp;Trevor Poulson ,&nbsp;Jared Rubin ,&nbsp;Nicole Chang ,&nbsp;Zeeshan A. Khan ,&nbsp;Nicholas J. Lemme ,&nbsp;Jorge Chahla ,&nbsp;Adam B. Yanke ,&nbsp;Brian J. Cole","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjp.2025.100235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) aims to restore meniscal deficiency with cadaveric meniscal tissue.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To compare MAT survivorship and conversion to arthroplasty in patients &lt;40 and ≥40 years old.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane databases.</div></div><div><h3>Study eligibility criteria</h3><div>Studies were included if they evaluated medial or lateral MAT, evaluated survivorship or conversion to arthroplasty, reported mean patient age, and were published after 2004.</div></div><div><h3>Study appraisal and synthesis methods</h3><div>Patient cohorts were sorted into 2 groups where mean age was lesser or greater than 40<!--> <!-->years. Data were pooled with the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1436 studies were identified, 41 included. Each study had MINORS score ≥9 indicating low risk of bias. There were 4079 patients (59.4% male) in the &lt;40-year cohort, with mean-weighted age 31.3<!--> <!-->years, follow-up 6.4<!--> <!-->years. There were 625 patients (66.9% male) in the ≥40-year cohort, with mean-weighted age 41.2<!--> <!-->years, follow-up 8.0<!--> <!-->years. Older patients had significantly more medial MATs (300; 61.9% vs 1746; 48.4%). Patients &lt;40 had weighted mean survivorship 76.3% (95% CI: 69.1%-83.5%) and conversion rate 5.0% (95% CI: 3.5%-6.6%). Patients ≥40 had weighted mean survivorship 72.1% (95% CI: 46.9%-97.3%) and conversion rate 13.1% (95% CI: 4.2%-22.0%).</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Unavailability of individual data sets.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There appears to be no significant differences in MAT survivorship or conversion to arthroplasty rates in patients &lt;40 and ≥40 in appropriately indicated patients that have concomitant pathology addressed. Older patients undergoing MAT have a higher rate of medial MAT compared with younger cohorts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100760,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meniscal allograft transplantation survivorship and conversion to arthroplasty in patients older and younger than 40: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Andrew S. Bi ,&nbsp;Udit Dave ,&nbsp;Trevor Poulson ,&nbsp;Jared Rubin ,&nbsp;Nicole Chang ,&nbsp;Zeeshan A. Khan ,&nbsp;Nicholas J. Lemme ,&nbsp;Jorge Chahla ,&nbsp;Adam B. Yanke ,&nbsp;Brian J. Cole\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjp.2025.100235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) aims to restore meniscal deficiency with cadaveric meniscal tissue.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To compare MAT survivorship and conversion to arthroplasty in patients &lt;40 and ≥40 years old.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane databases.</div></div><div><h3>Study eligibility criteria</h3><div>Studies were included if they evaluated medial or lateral MAT, evaluated survivorship or conversion to arthroplasty, reported mean patient age, and were published after 2004.</div></div><div><h3>Study appraisal and synthesis methods</h3><div>Patient cohorts were sorted into 2 groups where mean age was lesser or greater than 40<!--> <!-->years. Data were pooled with the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1436 studies were identified, 41 included. Each study had MINORS score ≥9 indicating low risk of bias. There were 4079 patients (59.4% male) in the &lt;40-year cohort, with mean-weighted age 31.3<!--> <!-->years, follow-up 6.4<!--> <!-->years. There were 625 patients (66.9% male) in the ≥40-year cohort, with mean-weighted age 41.2<!--> <!-->years, follow-up 8.0<!--> <!-->years. Older patients had significantly more medial MATs (300; 61.9% vs 1746; 48.4%). Patients &lt;40 had weighted mean survivorship 76.3% (95% CI: 69.1%-83.5%) and conversion rate 5.0% (95% CI: 3.5%-6.6%). Patients ≥40 had weighted mean survivorship 72.1% (95% CI: 46.9%-97.3%) and conversion rate 13.1% (95% CI: 4.2%-22.0%).</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Unavailability of individual data sets.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There appears to be no significant differences in MAT survivorship or conversion to arthroplasty rates in patients &lt;40 and ≥40 in appropriately indicated patients that have concomitant pathology addressed. Older patients undergoing MAT have a higher rate of medial MAT compared with younger cohorts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667254525000034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667254525000034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:半月板同种异体移植旨在用尸体半月板组织修复半月板缺损。目的比较40岁和≥40岁患者MAT的生存率和转到关节置换术的情况。数据来源pubmed, Embase, Cochrane数据库。研究资格标准:评估内侧或外侧MAT、评估生存率或转关节置换术、报告患者平均年龄并在2004年以后发表的研究被纳入。研究评价与综合方法将患者队列按平均年龄小于或大于40岁分为2组。数据用dersimonan - laird随机效应模型汇总。结果共纳入1436项研究,纳入41项。每项研究的minor评分≥9,表明低偏倚风险。40年队列共4079例患者(男性59.4%),平均加权年龄31.3岁,随访6.4年。≥40岁的队列中有625例患者(66.9%为男性),平均加权年龄41.2岁,随访8.0年。老年患者的内侧垫明显更多(300;61.9% vs 1746;48.4%)。40例患者的加权平均生存率为76.3% (95% CI: 69.1%-83.5%),转换率为5.0% (95% CI: 3.5%-6.6%)。≥40的患者加权平均生存率为72.1% (95% CI: 46.9%-97.3%),转换率为13.1% (95% CI: 4.2%-22.0%)。限制单个数据集不可用。结论:≥40和≥40患者的MAT生存率和关节置换术转换率似乎没有显著差异。与年轻患者相比,接受MAT的老年患者有更高的内侧MAT发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meniscal allograft transplantation survivorship and conversion to arthroplasty in patients older and younger than 40: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) aims to restore meniscal deficiency with cadaveric meniscal tissue.

Objectives

To compare MAT survivorship and conversion to arthroplasty in patients <40 and ≥40 years old.

Data sources

Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane databases.

Study eligibility criteria

Studies were included if they evaluated medial or lateral MAT, evaluated survivorship or conversion to arthroplasty, reported mean patient age, and were published after 2004.

Study appraisal and synthesis methods

Patient cohorts were sorted into 2 groups where mean age was lesser or greater than 40 years. Data were pooled with the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model.

Results

A total of 1436 studies were identified, 41 included. Each study had MINORS score ≥9 indicating low risk of bias. There were 4079 patients (59.4% male) in the <40-year cohort, with mean-weighted age 31.3 years, follow-up 6.4 years. There were 625 patients (66.9% male) in the ≥40-year cohort, with mean-weighted age 41.2 years, follow-up 8.0 years. Older patients had significantly more medial MATs (300; 61.9% vs 1746; 48.4%). Patients <40 had weighted mean survivorship 76.3% (95% CI: 69.1%-83.5%) and conversion rate 5.0% (95% CI: 3.5%-6.6%). Patients ≥40 had weighted mean survivorship 72.1% (95% CI: 46.9%-97.3%) and conversion rate 13.1% (95% CI: 4.2%-22.0%).

Limitations

Unavailability of individual data sets.

Conclusions

There appears to be no significant differences in MAT survivorship or conversion to arthroplasty rates in patients <40 and ≥40 in appropriately indicated patients that have concomitant pathology addressed. Older patients undergoing MAT have a higher rate of medial MAT compared with younger cohorts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信