Renee Else Michels , Diana Maria Johanna Delnoij , Martinus Bertram de Graaff
{"title":"在预期的循环中:医疗技术行业参与者的预期实践","authors":"Renee Else Michels , Diana Maria Johanna Delnoij , Martinus Bertram de Graaff","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The (anticipatory) governance of medical technology (MedTech) involves different types of actors. An important but under-theorized actor within the governance network are the companies that develop and market MedTech. In this paper, we use an anticipatory practice (AP) lens to critically reflect on the APs of mainly Dutch MedTech industry actors. We distinguish three categories of APs, provide examples, and describe complicating factors. Overall, we show that the APs of private industry and public governance actors are highly interdependent. We reflect on these interdependencies and offer the theoretical concept of an 'anticipatory loop' between public and private governance actors. We discuss the need for public governance actors to be aware of the uncertainties exacerbated by such an anticipatory loop and reflect on the complexities of an emerging desire to step out of this loop and anticipate together in an open and reflexive space. We make the case for an approach to the AG of MedTech that includes APs aimed at creating reflexive space for dialogue in addition to more long-term, standardized procedures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 103629"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In a loop of anticipation: The anticipatory practices of MedTech industry actors\",\"authors\":\"Renee Else Michels , Diana Maria Johanna Delnoij , Martinus Bertram de Graaff\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The (anticipatory) governance of medical technology (MedTech) involves different types of actors. An important but under-theorized actor within the governance network are the companies that develop and market MedTech. In this paper, we use an anticipatory practice (AP) lens to critically reflect on the APs of mainly Dutch MedTech industry actors. We distinguish three categories of APs, provide examples, and describe complicating factors. Overall, we show that the APs of private industry and public governance actors are highly interdependent. We reflect on these interdependencies and offer the theoretical concept of an 'anticipatory loop' between public and private governance actors. We discuss the need for public governance actors to be aware of the uncertainties exacerbated by such an anticipatory loop and reflect on the complexities of an emerging desire to step out of this loop and anticipate together in an open and reflexive space. We make the case for an approach to the AG of MedTech that includes APs aimed at creating reflexive space for dialogue in addition to more long-term, standardized procedures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Futures\",\"volume\":\"171 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103629\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Futures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328725000916\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328725000916","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
In a loop of anticipation: The anticipatory practices of MedTech industry actors
The (anticipatory) governance of medical technology (MedTech) involves different types of actors. An important but under-theorized actor within the governance network are the companies that develop and market MedTech. In this paper, we use an anticipatory practice (AP) lens to critically reflect on the APs of mainly Dutch MedTech industry actors. We distinguish three categories of APs, provide examples, and describe complicating factors. Overall, we show that the APs of private industry and public governance actors are highly interdependent. We reflect on these interdependencies and offer the theoretical concept of an 'anticipatory loop' between public and private governance actors. We discuss the need for public governance actors to be aware of the uncertainties exacerbated by such an anticipatory loop and reflect on the complexities of an emerging desire to step out of this loop and anticipate together in an open and reflexive space. We make the case for an approach to the AG of MedTech that includes APs aimed at creating reflexive space for dialogue in addition to more long-term, standardized procedures.
期刊介绍:
Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures