在预期的循环中:医疗技术行业参与者的预期实践

IF 3 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Renee Else Michels , Diana Maria Johanna Delnoij , Martinus Bertram de Graaff
{"title":"在预期的循环中:医疗技术行业参与者的预期实践","authors":"Renee Else Michels ,&nbsp;Diana Maria Johanna Delnoij ,&nbsp;Martinus Bertram de Graaff","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The (anticipatory) governance of medical technology (MedTech) involves different types of actors. An important but under-theorized actor within the governance network are the companies that develop and market MedTech. In this paper, we use an anticipatory practice (AP) lens to critically reflect on the APs of mainly Dutch MedTech industry actors. We distinguish three categories of APs, provide examples, and describe complicating factors. Overall, we show that the APs of private industry and public governance actors are highly interdependent. We reflect on these interdependencies and offer the theoretical concept of an 'anticipatory loop' between public and private governance actors. We discuss the need for public governance actors to be aware of the uncertainties exacerbated by such an anticipatory loop and reflect on the complexities of an emerging desire to step out of this loop and anticipate together in an open and reflexive space. We make the case for an approach to the AG of MedTech that includes APs aimed at creating reflexive space for dialogue in addition to more long-term, standardized procedures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 103629"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In a loop of anticipation: The anticipatory practices of MedTech industry actors\",\"authors\":\"Renee Else Michels ,&nbsp;Diana Maria Johanna Delnoij ,&nbsp;Martinus Bertram de Graaff\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The (anticipatory) governance of medical technology (MedTech) involves different types of actors. An important but under-theorized actor within the governance network are the companies that develop and market MedTech. In this paper, we use an anticipatory practice (AP) lens to critically reflect on the APs of mainly Dutch MedTech industry actors. We distinguish three categories of APs, provide examples, and describe complicating factors. Overall, we show that the APs of private industry and public governance actors are highly interdependent. We reflect on these interdependencies and offer the theoretical concept of an 'anticipatory loop' between public and private governance actors. We discuss the need for public governance actors to be aware of the uncertainties exacerbated by such an anticipatory loop and reflect on the complexities of an emerging desire to step out of this loop and anticipate together in an open and reflexive space. We make the case for an approach to the AG of MedTech that includes APs aimed at creating reflexive space for dialogue in addition to more long-term, standardized procedures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Futures\",\"volume\":\"171 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103629\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Futures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328725000916\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328725000916","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗技术(MedTech)的(预期)治理涉及不同类型的行动者。在治理网络中,开发和销售医疗技术的公司是一个重要但理论不足的参与者。在本文中,我们使用预期实践(AP)的镜头对主要是荷兰医疗技术行业参与者的AP进行批判性反思。我们区分了三种类型的ap,提供了例子,并描述了复杂的因素。总体而言,我们表明私营企业和公共治理参与者的ap是高度相互依存的。我们反思了这些相互依赖关系,并提出了公共和私人治理参与者之间“预期循环”的理论概念。我们讨论了公共治理行为者意识到这种预期循环加剧的不确定性的必要性,并反思了走出这种循环并在开放和反思的空间中共同预测的新愿望的复杂性。我们提出了一种医疗技术AG的方法,该方法包括旨在为对话创造反思性空间的ap,以及更长期、标准化的程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In a loop of anticipation: The anticipatory practices of MedTech industry actors
The (anticipatory) governance of medical technology (MedTech) involves different types of actors. An important but under-theorized actor within the governance network are the companies that develop and market MedTech. In this paper, we use an anticipatory practice (AP) lens to critically reflect on the APs of mainly Dutch MedTech industry actors. We distinguish three categories of APs, provide examples, and describe complicating factors. Overall, we show that the APs of private industry and public governance actors are highly interdependent. We reflect on these interdependencies and offer the theoretical concept of an 'anticipatory loop' between public and private governance actors. We discuss the need for public governance actors to be aware of the uncertainties exacerbated by such an anticipatory loop and reflect on the complexities of an emerging desire to step out of this loop and anticipate together in an open and reflexive space. We make the case for an approach to the AG of MedTech that includes APs aimed at creating reflexive space for dialogue in addition to more long-term, standardized procedures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Futures
Futures Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信