数字化对生态环境治理能力的影响:来自中国的证据

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Bangzhu Zhu , Shuangshuang Li , Julien Chevallier
{"title":"数字化对生态环境治理能力的影响:来自中国的证据","authors":"Bangzhu Zhu ,&nbsp;Shuangshuang Li ,&nbsp;Julien Chevallier","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Improving ecological environment governance capacity is crucial for achieving environmental sustainability, and the potential benefits of digitalization should be fully leveraged. This study is distinguished by its innovative development of a composite index aimed at evaluating governance capacity in ecological environment. Additionally, we conduct an empirical analysis to explore the causal relationship between digitalization and ecological environment governance capacity while identifying the mechanisms that underpin this relationship. Based on provincial data from China, the research reveals that digitalization significantly enhances ecological environment governance capacity. The finding remains robust following a series of robustness tests. More specifically, for every one unit increase in digitalization, ecological environment governance capacity can be enhanced by 0.06 units. Furthermore, the enhancement effect is more pronounced in the eastern region, big data pilot zone, high carbon emission and high innovation resource endowment regions. The coefficients of digitalization in these areas are 0.123, 0.130, 0.080, and 0.137 respectively. Mechanism analysis shows that digitalization improves ecological environment governance capacity by fostering renewable energy development and facilitating knowledge spillover. Further spatial analysis presents significant spatial spillover effects of digitalization on ecological environment governance capacity. These findings provide valuable insights for enhancing ecological environment governance capacity and promoting environmental sustainability through digitalization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 108014"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of digitization on ecological environment governance capacity: Evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Bangzhu Zhu ,&nbsp;Shuangshuang Li ,&nbsp;Julien Chevallier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Improving ecological environment governance capacity is crucial for achieving environmental sustainability, and the potential benefits of digitalization should be fully leveraged. This study is distinguished by its innovative development of a composite index aimed at evaluating governance capacity in ecological environment. Additionally, we conduct an empirical analysis to explore the causal relationship between digitalization and ecological environment governance capacity while identifying the mechanisms that underpin this relationship. Based on provincial data from China, the research reveals that digitalization significantly enhances ecological environment governance capacity. The finding remains robust following a series of robustness tests. More specifically, for every one unit increase in digitalization, ecological environment governance capacity can be enhanced by 0.06 units. Furthermore, the enhancement effect is more pronounced in the eastern region, big data pilot zone, high carbon emission and high innovation resource endowment regions. The coefficients of digitalization in these areas are 0.123, 0.130, 0.080, and 0.137 respectively. Mechanism analysis shows that digitalization improves ecological environment governance capacity by fostering renewable energy development and facilitating knowledge spillover. Further spatial analysis presents significant spatial spillover effects of digitalization on ecological environment governance capacity. These findings provide valuable insights for enhancing ecological environment governance capacity and promoting environmental sustainability through digitalization.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108014\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525002112\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525002112","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提高生态环境治理能力是实现环境可持续发展的关键,应充分发挥数字化的潜在效益。本研究的特色在于创新开发了一种评价生态环境治理能力的综合指标。此外,我们还进行了实证分析,探讨了数字化与生态环境治理能力之间的因果关系,并确定了支撑这种关系的机制。基于中国省级数据的研究表明,数字化显著提高了生态环境治理能力。经过一系列稳健性测试后,这一发现仍然是稳健性的。更具体地说,数字化水平每提高1个单位,生态环境治理能力可提高0.06个单位。东部地区、大数据先行区、高碳排放和高创新资源禀赋地区的提升效应更为明显。这些地区的数字化系数分别为0.123、0.130、0.080和0.137。机制分析表明,数字化通过促进可再生能源发展和促进知识溢出来提高生态环境治理能力。进一步的空间分析表明,数字化对生态环境治理能力具有显著的空间溢出效应。这些研究结果为通过数字化提升生态环境治理能力和促进环境可持续性提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of digitization on ecological environment governance capacity: Evidence from China
Improving ecological environment governance capacity is crucial for achieving environmental sustainability, and the potential benefits of digitalization should be fully leveraged. This study is distinguished by its innovative development of a composite index aimed at evaluating governance capacity in ecological environment. Additionally, we conduct an empirical analysis to explore the causal relationship between digitalization and ecological environment governance capacity while identifying the mechanisms that underpin this relationship. Based on provincial data from China, the research reveals that digitalization significantly enhances ecological environment governance capacity. The finding remains robust following a series of robustness tests. More specifically, for every one unit increase in digitalization, ecological environment governance capacity can be enhanced by 0.06 units. Furthermore, the enhancement effect is more pronounced in the eastern region, big data pilot zone, high carbon emission and high innovation resource endowment regions. The coefficients of digitalization in these areas are 0.123, 0.130, 0.080, and 0.137 respectively. Mechanism analysis shows that digitalization improves ecological environment governance capacity by fostering renewable energy development and facilitating knowledge spillover. Further spatial analysis presents significant spatial spillover effects of digitalization on ecological environment governance capacity. These findings provide valuable insights for enhancing ecological environment governance capacity and promoting environmental sustainability through digitalization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信