中国将气候变化因素纳入政策环境影响评价的实践

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Qingyang Wang , Xinyi Zhang , Jiandong Bai , Jing Wu , I-Shin Chang
{"title":"中国将气候变化因素纳入政策环境影响评价的实践","authors":"Qingyang Wang ,&nbsp;Xinyi Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiandong Bai ,&nbsp;Jing Wu ,&nbsp;I-Shin Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental impact assessment for policy (Policy EIA) is an important and effective means to couple with climate change (CC) mitigation and adaptation during the policy-making process by systematically integrating CC considerations. As the world's largest carbon emitter and a member of the Parties of the Paris Agreement, China plays a vital role in reducing and neutralizing greenhouse gases emissions. To demonstrate the determined attitude and progressive actions to confront global warming, in China, 17 pilot Policy EIA cases were initiated from 2021 to 2023, where CC considerations are required to be integrated into Policy EIA. Adapted from the best available international practices, 22 focusing and streamlined criteria covering CC mitigation and adaptation are assembled to prudentially scrutinize CC considerations in these pilot cases. In addition, direct content analysis is applied to identify and analyze text references related to the evaluation criteria, and correlation analysis is employed to refine and validate the research findings. Overall, the results indicate that while climatic factors are considered to some extent, the integration of CC considerations into Policy EIA is in an unsatisfactory manner, with dissimilar performance across different subjects and categories. Besides, much more effort was put into mitigation consideration than into adaptation consideration. Moreover, there is a lack of applicable quantitative methodologies to measure CC impacts, while the absence of accessible, robust, and quality-assured data has become a major obstacle to CC assessment. Correspondingly, some recommendations are proposed to further improve the integration of CC considerations into Policy EIA. The research framework provides a reasonable and effective approach to evaluating the integration of CC considerations into Policy EIA, with potential applicability worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 108011"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practice of the integration of climate change considerations into environmental impact assessment for policy in China\",\"authors\":\"Qingyang Wang ,&nbsp;Xinyi Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiandong Bai ,&nbsp;Jing Wu ,&nbsp;I-Shin Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Environmental impact assessment for policy (Policy EIA) is an important and effective means to couple with climate change (CC) mitigation and adaptation during the policy-making process by systematically integrating CC considerations. As the world's largest carbon emitter and a member of the Parties of the Paris Agreement, China plays a vital role in reducing and neutralizing greenhouse gases emissions. To demonstrate the determined attitude and progressive actions to confront global warming, in China, 17 pilot Policy EIA cases were initiated from 2021 to 2023, where CC considerations are required to be integrated into Policy EIA. Adapted from the best available international practices, 22 focusing and streamlined criteria covering CC mitigation and adaptation are assembled to prudentially scrutinize CC considerations in these pilot cases. In addition, direct content analysis is applied to identify and analyze text references related to the evaluation criteria, and correlation analysis is employed to refine and validate the research findings. Overall, the results indicate that while climatic factors are considered to some extent, the integration of CC considerations into Policy EIA is in an unsatisfactory manner, with dissimilar performance across different subjects and categories. Besides, much more effort was put into mitigation consideration than into adaptation consideration. Moreover, there is a lack of applicable quantitative methodologies to measure CC impacts, while the absence of accessible, robust, and quality-assured data has become a major obstacle to CC assessment. Correspondingly, some recommendations are proposed to further improve the integration of CC considerations into Policy EIA. The research framework provides a reasonable and effective approach to evaluating the integration of CC considerations into Policy EIA, with potential applicability worldwide.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108011\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525002082\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525002082","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政策环境影响评价(policy environment impact assessment for policy,简称政策环评)是在政策制定过程中,通过系统地整合气候变化因素,将气候变化减缓和适应与政策制定相结合的重要而有效的手段。作为全球最大的碳排放国和《巴黎协定》缔约方,中国在减少和中和温室气体排放方面发挥着至关重要的作用。为了展示应对全球变暖的坚定态度和渐进行动,在中国,从2021年到2023年,启动了17个政策性环境影响评估试点案例,其中需要将CC考虑纳入政策环境影响评估。根据现有的最佳国际做法,汇编了22项重点突出和精简的气候变化减缓和适应标准,以审慎审查这些试点案例中的气候变化考虑因素。此外,直接内容分析用于识别和分析与评价标准相关的文本参考文献,并使用相关分析来细化和验证研究结果。总体而言,结果表明,虽然在一定程度上考虑了气候因素,但将CC因素整合到政策环境影响评估中的方式并不令人满意,不同主题和类别的表现不同。此外,在减缓方面的考虑比在适应方面的考虑付出了更多的努力。此外,缺乏适用的定量方法来衡量气候变化影响,而缺乏可获得的、可靠的、有质量保证的数据已成为气候变化评估的主要障碍。相应地,本文提出了一些建议,以进一步改善将CC考虑纳入政策环评。该研究框架提供了一种合理有效的方法来评估CC因素与政策环境影响评估的整合,具有潜在的全球适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practice of the integration of climate change considerations into environmental impact assessment for policy in China
Environmental impact assessment for policy (Policy EIA) is an important and effective means to couple with climate change (CC) mitigation and adaptation during the policy-making process by systematically integrating CC considerations. As the world's largest carbon emitter and a member of the Parties of the Paris Agreement, China plays a vital role in reducing and neutralizing greenhouse gases emissions. To demonstrate the determined attitude and progressive actions to confront global warming, in China, 17 pilot Policy EIA cases were initiated from 2021 to 2023, where CC considerations are required to be integrated into Policy EIA. Adapted from the best available international practices, 22 focusing and streamlined criteria covering CC mitigation and adaptation are assembled to prudentially scrutinize CC considerations in these pilot cases. In addition, direct content analysis is applied to identify and analyze text references related to the evaluation criteria, and correlation analysis is employed to refine and validate the research findings. Overall, the results indicate that while climatic factors are considered to some extent, the integration of CC considerations into Policy EIA is in an unsatisfactory manner, with dissimilar performance across different subjects and categories. Besides, much more effort was put into mitigation consideration than into adaptation consideration. Moreover, there is a lack of applicable quantitative methodologies to measure CC impacts, while the absence of accessible, robust, and quality-assured data has become a major obstacle to CC assessment. Correspondingly, some recommendations are proposed to further improve the integration of CC considerations into Policy EIA. The research framework provides a reasonable and effective approach to evaluating the integration of CC considerations into Policy EIA, with potential applicability worldwide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信