{"title":"英格兰和威尔士-苏格兰儿童保健法","authors":"L. Francoz Terminal","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This article focuses on the British common law approach of child’s personal involvement in medical decisions. This article seeks for a key of understanding of Court’s decisions that apparently are irreconcilable or contra legem.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>It assesses how case law makes the balance between the child’s rights and interests and what tests are used by judges to achieve it.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The child’s right to make decisions must be balanced with parental responsibility. At the same time welfare protection, age, understanding of the child, must be articulated by the court in ruling on the case. Liability of medical practitioners is also at stake and connected issues must also be considered in drawing the legal frame ruling medical decisions, made with respect to under-18 patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The legal frame depends on the child’s age and maturity and can be split into three different set of rules that we propose to articulate in a decreasing scale of the child’s legal empowerment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101092"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Child Healthcare Law in England and Wales – Scotland\",\"authors\":\"L. Francoz Terminal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This article focuses on the British common law approach of child’s personal involvement in medical decisions. This article seeks for a key of understanding of Court’s decisions that apparently are irreconcilable or contra legem.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>It assesses how case law makes the balance between the child’s rights and interests and what tests are used by judges to achieve it.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The child’s right to make decisions must be balanced with parental responsibility. At the same time welfare protection, age, understanding of the child, must be articulated by the court in ruling on the case. Liability of medical practitioners is also at stake and connected issues must also be considered in drawing the legal frame ruling medical decisions, made with respect to under-18 patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The legal frame depends on the child’s age and maturity and can be split into three different set of rules that we propose to articulate in a decreasing scale of the child’s legal empowerment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Child Healthcare Law in England and Wales – Scotland
Introduction
This article focuses on the British common law approach of child’s personal involvement in medical decisions. This article seeks for a key of understanding of Court’s decisions that apparently are irreconcilable or contra legem.
Method
It assesses how case law makes the balance between the child’s rights and interests and what tests are used by judges to achieve it.
Results
The child’s right to make decisions must be balanced with parental responsibility. At the same time welfare protection, age, understanding of the child, must be articulated by the court in ruling on the case. Liability of medical practitioners is also at stake and connected issues must also be considered in drawing the legal frame ruling medical decisions, made with respect to under-18 patients.
Conclusion
The legal frame depends on the child’s age and maturity and can be split into three different set of rules that we propose to articulate in a decreasing scale of the child’s legal empowerment.
期刊介绍:
This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.