英格兰和威尔士-苏格兰儿童保健法

Q3 Medicine
L. Francoz Terminal
{"title":"英格兰和威尔士-苏格兰儿童保健法","authors":"L. Francoz Terminal","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This article focuses on the British common law approach of child’s personal involvement in medical decisions. This article seeks for a key of understanding of Court’s decisions that apparently are irreconcilable or contra legem.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>It assesses how case law makes the balance between the child’s rights and interests and what tests are used by judges to achieve it.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The child’s right to make decisions must be balanced with parental responsibility. At the same time welfare protection, age, understanding of the child, must be articulated by the court in ruling on the case. Liability of medical practitioners is also at stake and connected issues must also be considered in drawing the legal frame ruling medical decisions, made with respect to under-18 patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The legal frame depends on the child’s age and maturity and can be split into three different set of rules that we propose to articulate in a decreasing scale of the child’s legal empowerment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101092"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Child Healthcare Law in England and Wales – Scotland\",\"authors\":\"L. Francoz Terminal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This article focuses on the British common law approach of child’s personal involvement in medical decisions. This article seeks for a key of understanding of Court’s decisions that apparently are irreconcilable or contra legem.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>It assesses how case law makes the balance between the child’s rights and interests and what tests are used by judges to achieve it.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The child’s right to make decisions must be balanced with parental responsibility. At the same time welfare protection, age, understanding of the child, must be articulated by the court in ruling on the case. Liability of medical practitioners is also at stake and connected issues must also be considered in drawing the legal frame ruling medical decisions, made with respect to under-18 patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The legal frame depends on the child’s age and maturity and can be split into three different set of rules that we propose to articulate in a decreasing scale of the child’s legal empowerment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文主要介绍英国普通法中儿童个人参与医疗决策的做法。本文试图寻找一把理解法院判决的钥匙,这些判决显然是不可调和的或与法律相悖的。方法评估判例法如何在儿童权利和利益之间取得平衡,以及法官为实现这一平衡所使用的检验标准。结果:孩子的决定权必须与父母的责任相平衡。同时,福利保护、年龄、对儿童的理解,都必须由法院在案件裁决中加以阐明。医生的责任也受到威胁,在为18岁以下患者作出的医疗决定制定法律框架时,也必须考虑相关问题。法律框架取决于儿童的年龄和成熟程度,可以分为三套不同的规则,我们建议在儿童法律授权的递减规模中阐明这些规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Child Healthcare Law in England and Wales – Scotland

Introduction

This article focuses on the British common law approach of child’s personal involvement in medical decisions. This article seeks for a key of understanding of Court’s decisions that apparently are irreconcilable or contra legem.

Method

It assesses how case law makes the balance between the child’s rights and interests and what tests are used by judges to achieve it.

Results

The child’s right to make decisions must be balanced with parental responsibility. At the same time welfare protection, age, understanding of the child, must be articulated by the court in ruling on the case. Liability of medical practitioners is also at stake and connected issues must also be considered in drawing the legal frame ruling medical decisions, made with respect to under-18 patients.

Conclusion

The legal frame depends on the child’s age and maturity and can be split into three different set of rules that we propose to articulate in a decreasing scale of the child’s legal empowerment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信