{"title":"对中世纪早期希腊手工器皿研究的岩石学贡献:以波奥提亚和阿该亚为例","authors":"T.K. Vasileiou, A.K. Vionis","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The beginning of the Byzantine ‘Dark Ages’ (7th-9th cent. CE) conventionally signify the end of Antiquity, as the transition to a new, yet prolonged, dismal period that transformed every aspect of life for the societies in the Eastern Mediterranean (<span><span>Haldon, 1990</span></span>, <span><span>Karayannopoulos, 2001</span></span>; <span><span>Vionis, 2020a</span></span>). Amongst the many ‘misfortunes’ to befall upon the Byzantine Empire, the advance and settlement of Slav tribes into the southernmost regions of the Balkan peninsula have repeatedly been discussed by scholars as one of the key events of the Early Middle Ages in mainland Greece (<span><span>Avraméa, 1997</span></span>, <span><span>Charanis, 1950</span></span>, <span><span>Koder, 2020</span></span>). Traditionally in material culture, this descent is exemplified by a type of handmade vessels, known as Slav ware, and found in various contexts from the late 6th century onwards (<span><span>Anagnostakis and Poulou-Papadimitriou, 1997</span></span>, <span><span>Aupert, 1980</span></span>, <span><span>Gallimore et al., 2022</span></span>, <span><span>Gregory, 1993a</span></span>; <span><span>Vida and Völling, 2000</span></span>).</div><div>Despite its particular interest, little attention has been drawn on this pottery, often mentioned in archaeological reports, though generally overlooked. However, numerous studies recently (e.g. urban centres, fortresses, burial sites, rescue excavation findings) have contributed greatly to the typology of these vessels (<span><span>Athanasoulis and Vassiliou, 2009</span></span>, <span><span>Athanasoulis and Vassiliou, 2014</span></span>, <span><span>Aupert, 1980</span></span>, <span><span>Vida and Völling, 2000</span></span>; <span><span>Vikatou, 2002</span></span>; <span><span>Zachariadis, 2014</span></span>, <span><span>Zachariadis, 2021</span></span>), yet they remain almost absent from analytical pottery studies. In this paper, samples from two regions, the province of Boeotia in central Greece (<span><span>Bintliff, 2012</span></span>, <span><span>Vionis, 2008</span></span>, <span><span>Vionis, 2017</span></span>, <span><span>Vionis and Loizou, 2017</span></span>) and the area of Kamenitsa in Achaea, provide a representative assemblage of handmade pottery of the ‘Slav’ tradition. By attempting a macro to micro approach, this study presents some preliminary remarks regarding technological and compositional characteristics of this ware through TL-OM and aspires to initiate a discussion on aspects of handmade pottery technology, the ‘Slav’ ware tradition, population movement and the accommodation of modes and styles in the Byzantine Early Middle Ages.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 105226"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A petrographic contribution to the study of handmade vessels from Early medieval Greece: A case-study from Boeotia and Achaea\",\"authors\":\"T.K. Vasileiou, A.K. Vionis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The beginning of the Byzantine ‘Dark Ages’ (7th-9th cent. CE) conventionally signify the end of Antiquity, as the transition to a new, yet prolonged, dismal period that transformed every aspect of life for the societies in the Eastern Mediterranean (<span><span>Haldon, 1990</span></span>, <span><span>Karayannopoulos, 2001</span></span>; <span><span>Vionis, 2020a</span></span>). Amongst the many ‘misfortunes’ to befall upon the Byzantine Empire, the advance and settlement of Slav tribes into the southernmost regions of the Balkan peninsula have repeatedly been discussed by scholars as one of the key events of the Early Middle Ages in mainland Greece (<span><span>Avraméa, 1997</span></span>, <span><span>Charanis, 1950</span></span>, <span><span>Koder, 2020</span></span>). Traditionally in material culture, this descent is exemplified by a type of handmade vessels, known as Slav ware, and found in various contexts from the late 6th century onwards (<span><span>Anagnostakis and Poulou-Papadimitriou, 1997</span></span>, <span><span>Aupert, 1980</span></span>, <span><span>Gallimore et al., 2022</span></span>, <span><span>Gregory, 1993a</span></span>; <span><span>Vida and Völling, 2000</span></span>).</div><div>Despite its particular interest, little attention has been drawn on this pottery, often mentioned in archaeological reports, though generally overlooked. However, numerous studies recently (e.g. urban centres, fortresses, burial sites, rescue excavation findings) have contributed greatly to the typology of these vessels (<span><span>Athanasoulis and Vassiliou, 2009</span></span>, <span><span>Athanasoulis and Vassiliou, 2014</span></span>, <span><span>Aupert, 1980</span></span>, <span><span>Vida and Völling, 2000</span></span>; <span><span>Vikatou, 2002</span></span>; <span><span>Zachariadis, 2014</span></span>, <span><span>Zachariadis, 2021</span></span>), yet they remain almost absent from analytical pottery studies. In this paper, samples from two regions, the province of Boeotia in central Greece (<span><span>Bintliff, 2012</span></span>, <span><span>Vionis, 2008</span></span>, <span><span>Vionis, 2017</span></span>, <span><span>Vionis and Loizou, 2017</span></span>) and the area of Kamenitsa in Achaea, provide a representative assemblage of handmade pottery of the ‘Slav’ tradition. By attempting a macro to micro approach, this study presents some preliminary remarks regarding technological and compositional characteristics of this ware through TL-OM and aspires to initiate a discussion on aspects of handmade pottery technology, the ‘Slav’ ware tradition, population movement and the accommodation of modes and styles in the Byzantine Early Middle Ages.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"volume\":\"65 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25002597\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25002597","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A petrographic contribution to the study of handmade vessels from Early medieval Greece: A case-study from Boeotia and Achaea
The beginning of the Byzantine ‘Dark Ages’ (7th-9th cent. CE) conventionally signify the end of Antiquity, as the transition to a new, yet prolonged, dismal period that transformed every aspect of life for the societies in the Eastern Mediterranean (Haldon, 1990, Karayannopoulos, 2001; Vionis, 2020a). Amongst the many ‘misfortunes’ to befall upon the Byzantine Empire, the advance and settlement of Slav tribes into the southernmost regions of the Balkan peninsula have repeatedly been discussed by scholars as one of the key events of the Early Middle Ages in mainland Greece (Avraméa, 1997, Charanis, 1950, Koder, 2020). Traditionally in material culture, this descent is exemplified by a type of handmade vessels, known as Slav ware, and found in various contexts from the late 6th century onwards (Anagnostakis and Poulou-Papadimitriou, 1997, Aupert, 1980, Gallimore et al., 2022, Gregory, 1993a; Vida and Völling, 2000).
Despite its particular interest, little attention has been drawn on this pottery, often mentioned in archaeological reports, though generally overlooked. However, numerous studies recently (e.g. urban centres, fortresses, burial sites, rescue excavation findings) have contributed greatly to the typology of these vessels (Athanasoulis and Vassiliou, 2009, Athanasoulis and Vassiliou, 2014, Aupert, 1980, Vida and Völling, 2000; Vikatou, 2002; Zachariadis, 2014, Zachariadis, 2021), yet they remain almost absent from analytical pottery studies. In this paper, samples from two regions, the province of Boeotia in central Greece (Bintliff, 2012, Vionis, 2008, Vionis, 2017, Vionis and Loizou, 2017) and the area of Kamenitsa in Achaea, provide a representative assemblage of handmade pottery of the ‘Slav’ tradition. By attempting a macro to micro approach, this study presents some preliminary remarks regarding technological and compositional characteristics of this ware through TL-OM and aspires to initiate a discussion on aspects of handmade pottery technology, the ‘Slav’ ware tradition, population movement and the accommodation of modes and styles in the Byzantine Early Middle Ages.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.