Z. Chati , S. Tissier , C. Balaj , N. Benzaghou , M. Angioi , M. Amor , J. Lemoine
{"title":"心肌缺血和血运重建筛查对心血管预后的影响:来自Nancy缺血登记的见解","authors":"Z. Chati , S. Tissier , C. Balaj , N. Benzaghou , M. Angioi , M. Amor , J. Lemoine","doi":"10.1016/j.acvd.2025.04.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Early detection and management of myocardial ischemia, particularly in high-risk individuals, represent a critical strategy for reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The benefit of screening and revascularization in primary prevention remains less clear.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Nancy Ischemia Registry aims to study the real-world impact of myocardial ischemia screening and revascularization on cardiovascular outcomes in both primary and secondary prevention settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between May 2021 and December 2022, 3020 patients were prospectively enrolled.</div><div>Primary prevention: CACS, CCTA.</div><div>Secondary prevention: Stress Echo or Stress CMR.</div><div>Patients with suspected myocardial ischemia underwent coronary angiography. Revascularization was performed if at least one significant coronary lesion (stenosis<!--> <!-->≥<!--> <!-->70% or fractional flow reserve [FFR]<!--> <!-->≤<!--> <!-->0.80) was identified. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of MACE, defined as myocardial revascularization or cardiovascular death, by the end of 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 3020 patients screened.</div><div>Primary prevention cohort (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1732): 80% had no myocardial ischemia, while 9.6% (207 patients) underwent revascularization.</div><div>Secondary prevention cohort (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->693): 78% had no myocardial ischemia, while 11.6% (103 patients) underwent revascularization.</div><div>At follow-up: The cumulative incidence of MACE was 15% in the primary prevention group versus 20% in the secondary prevention group (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: [1.02–1.10]; <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01).</div><div>Among patients with moderate ischemia but no indication for revascularization, MACE incidence was 4%, compared to 2% in those without ischemia (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: [1.01–1.06]; <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.05) (<span><span>Fig. 1</span></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In a real-world clinical setting, screening for myocardial ischemia using anatomical imaging and implementing timely revascularization significantly reduced the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. This benefit was particularly evident in the primary prevention cohort, highlighting the importance of early detection and intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55472,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":"118 6","pages":"Page S237"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of screening for myocardial ischemia and revascularization on cardiovascular outcomes: Insights from the Nancy ischemia registry\",\"authors\":\"Z. Chati , S. Tissier , C. Balaj , N. Benzaghou , M. Angioi , M. Amor , J. Lemoine\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acvd.2025.04.037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Early detection and management of myocardial ischemia, particularly in high-risk individuals, represent a critical strategy for reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The benefit of screening and revascularization in primary prevention remains less clear.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Nancy Ischemia Registry aims to study the real-world impact of myocardial ischemia screening and revascularization on cardiovascular outcomes in both primary and secondary prevention settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between May 2021 and December 2022, 3020 patients were prospectively enrolled.</div><div>Primary prevention: CACS, CCTA.</div><div>Secondary prevention: Stress Echo or Stress CMR.</div><div>Patients with suspected myocardial ischemia underwent coronary angiography. Revascularization was performed if at least one significant coronary lesion (stenosis<!--> <!-->≥<!--> <!-->70% or fractional flow reserve [FFR]<!--> <!-->≤<!--> <!-->0.80) was identified. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of MACE, defined as myocardial revascularization or cardiovascular death, by the end of 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 3020 patients screened.</div><div>Primary prevention cohort (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1732): 80% had no myocardial ischemia, while 9.6% (207 patients) underwent revascularization.</div><div>Secondary prevention cohort (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->693): 78% had no myocardial ischemia, while 11.6% (103 patients) underwent revascularization.</div><div>At follow-up: The cumulative incidence of MACE was 15% in the primary prevention group versus 20% in the secondary prevention group (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: [1.02–1.10]; <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01).</div><div>Among patients with moderate ischemia but no indication for revascularization, MACE incidence was 4%, compared to 2% in those without ischemia (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: [1.01–1.06]; <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.05) (<span><span>Fig. 1</span></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In a real-world clinical setting, screening for myocardial ischemia using anatomical imaging and implementing timely revascularization significantly reduced the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. This benefit was particularly evident in the primary prevention cohort, highlighting the importance of early detection and intervention.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases\",\"volume\":\"118 6\",\"pages\":\"Page S237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875213625002657\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875213625002657","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of screening for myocardial ischemia and revascularization on cardiovascular outcomes: Insights from the Nancy ischemia registry
Background
Early detection and management of myocardial ischemia, particularly in high-risk individuals, represent a critical strategy for reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The benefit of screening and revascularization in primary prevention remains less clear.
Objectives
Nancy Ischemia Registry aims to study the real-world impact of myocardial ischemia screening and revascularization on cardiovascular outcomes in both primary and secondary prevention settings.
Methods
Between May 2021 and December 2022, 3020 patients were prospectively enrolled.
Primary prevention: CACS, CCTA.
Secondary prevention: Stress Echo or Stress CMR.
Patients with suspected myocardial ischemia underwent coronary angiography. Revascularization was performed if at least one significant coronary lesion (stenosis ≥ 70% or fractional flow reserve [FFR] ≤ 0.80) was identified. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of MACE, defined as myocardial revascularization or cardiovascular death, by the end of 2023.
Results
Among the 3020 patients screened.
Primary prevention cohort (n = 1732): 80% had no myocardial ischemia, while 9.6% (207 patients) underwent revascularization.
Secondary prevention cohort (n = 693): 78% had no myocardial ischemia, while 11.6% (103 patients) underwent revascularization.
At follow-up: The cumulative incidence of MACE was 15% in the primary prevention group versus 20% in the secondary prevention group (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: [1.02–1.10]; P < 0.01).
Among patients with moderate ischemia but no indication for revascularization, MACE incidence was 4%, compared to 2% in those without ischemia (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: [1.01–1.06]; P < 0.05) (Fig. 1).
Conclusion
In a real-world clinical setting, screening for myocardial ischemia using anatomical imaging and implementing timely revascularization significantly reduced the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. This benefit was particularly evident in the primary prevention cohort, highlighting the importance of early detection and intervention.
期刊介绍:
The Journal publishes original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, review articles and editorials. Topics covered include coronary artery and valve diseases, interventional and pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, arrhythmias and stimulation, cardiovascular imaging, vascular medicine and hypertension, epidemiology and risk factors, and large multicenter studies. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases also publishes abstracts of papers presented at the annual sessions of the Journées Européennes de la Société Française de Cardiologie and the guidelines edited by the French Society of Cardiology.