秸秆还田在功能基因的调控下增强了水稻土的全球变暖潜势

IF 7.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Ziying Cui , Jingli Wei , Yukun Pan , Wen Zhang , Jialong Lv , Yajun Yang
{"title":"秸秆还田在功能基因的调控下增强了水稻土的全球变暖潜势","authors":"Ziying Cui ,&nbsp;Jingli Wei ,&nbsp;Yukun Pan ,&nbsp;Wen Zhang ,&nbsp;Jialong Lv ,&nbsp;Yajun Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2025.104293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Straw return enhances soil carbon storage but raises concerns over greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study examined the impact of milk vetch (ZYY), wheat (XM), and rape (YC) straws on GHG emissions from paddy soils via incubation experiment. The dynamics of functional genes and bacterial communities were analyzed. Results indicated that straw addition significantly increased total organic carbon (TOC) by 51.7 %–70.4 % and dissolved organic carbon by 318.5 %–445.1 %, compared to CK. This led to elevated CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions but reduced N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. The XM treatment showed the highest global warming potential (GWP), 53.4 % and 25.0 % higher than ZYY and YC, respectively. TOC and soil microbial biomass nitrogen explained 6.8 % of CO<sub>2</sub> and 8.0 % of N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. Straw addition also intensified the citrate cycle and pentose phosphate pathway, further promoting CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. The gene <em>mcrA</em> was the primary factor influencing CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, with <em>Ignavibacteriae</em> and <em>Anaerolinea</em> identified as its main hosts. Straw addition likely suppressed N<sub>2</sub>O emissions by regulating denitrification-related species (e.g., <em>Anaeromyxobacter</em>, <em>Geobacter</em>). N<sub>2</sub>O emissions were also influenced by <em>mcrA</em>, <em>pmoA</em>, and their hosts, potentially linked to anaerobic ammonium oxidation. This study offers insights into straw's effects on GHG emissions through functional gene and microbial regulation in paddy soils.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11725,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 104293"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Straw return enhances the global warming potential in paddy soil under the regulation of functional genes\",\"authors\":\"Ziying Cui ,&nbsp;Jingli Wei ,&nbsp;Yukun Pan ,&nbsp;Wen Zhang ,&nbsp;Jialong Lv ,&nbsp;Yajun Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eti.2025.104293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Straw return enhances soil carbon storage but raises concerns over greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study examined the impact of milk vetch (ZYY), wheat (XM), and rape (YC) straws on GHG emissions from paddy soils via incubation experiment. The dynamics of functional genes and bacterial communities were analyzed. Results indicated that straw addition significantly increased total organic carbon (TOC) by 51.7 %–70.4 % and dissolved organic carbon by 318.5 %–445.1 %, compared to CK. This led to elevated CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions but reduced N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. The XM treatment showed the highest global warming potential (GWP), 53.4 % and 25.0 % higher than ZYY and YC, respectively. TOC and soil microbial biomass nitrogen explained 6.8 % of CO<sub>2</sub> and 8.0 % of N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. Straw addition also intensified the citrate cycle and pentose phosphate pathway, further promoting CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. The gene <em>mcrA</em> was the primary factor influencing CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, with <em>Ignavibacteriae</em> and <em>Anaerolinea</em> identified as its main hosts. Straw addition likely suppressed N<sub>2</sub>O emissions by regulating denitrification-related species (e.g., <em>Anaeromyxobacter</em>, <em>Geobacter</em>). N<sub>2</sub>O emissions were also influenced by <em>mcrA</em>, <em>pmoA</em>, and their hosts, potentially linked to anaerobic ammonium oxidation. This study offers insights into straw's effects on GHG emissions through functional gene and microbial regulation in paddy soils.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Technology & Innovation\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Technology & Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186425002792\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186425002792","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

秸秆还田提高了土壤碳储量,但也引起了对温室气体排放的担忧。本研究通过培养试验研究了豇豆(ZYY)、小麦(XM)和油菜(YC)秸秆对水稻土温室气体排放的影响。分析了功能基因和细菌群落的动态变化。结果表明,与对照相比,添加秸秆显著增加了总有机碳(TOC) 51.7 % ~ 70.4 %,溶解有机碳增加318.5 % ~ 445.1 %。这导致CO2和CH4排放量增加,但N2O排放量减少。XM处理的全球升温潜能值(GWP)最高,分别比ZYY和YC高53.4% %和25.0 %。TOC和土壤微生物生物量氮解释了6.8% %的CO2和8. %的N2O排放。秸秆的添加也强化了柠檬酸循环和戊糖磷酸途径,进一步促进了CO2的排放。mcrA基因是影响CH4排放的主要因素,ignavibacterae和厌氧菌是其主要宿主。秸秆添加可能通过调节与反硝化相关的物种(如厌氧杆菌、地杆菌)来抑制N2O排放。N2O排放也受到mcrA、pmoA及其宿主的影响,可能与厌氧铵氧化有关。本研究为水稻土秸秆通过功能基因和微生物调控对温室气体排放的影响提供了新的思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Straw return enhances the global warming potential in paddy soil under the regulation of functional genes
Straw return enhances soil carbon storage but raises concerns over greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study examined the impact of milk vetch (ZYY), wheat (XM), and rape (YC) straws on GHG emissions from paddy soils via incubation experiment. The dynamics of functional genes and bacterial communities were analyzed. Results indicated that straw addition significantly increased total organic carbon (TOC) by 51.7 %–70.4 % and dissolved organic carbon by 318.5 %–445.1 %, compared to CK. This led to elevated CO2 and CH4 emissions but reduced N2O emissions. The XM treatment showed the highest global warming potential (GWP), 53.4 % and 25.0 % higher than ZYY and YC, respectively. TOC and soil microbial biomass nitrogen explained 6.8 % of CO2 and 8.0 % of N2O emissions. Straw addition also intensified the citrate cycle and pentose phosphate pathway, further promoting CO2 emissions. The gene mcrA was the primary factor influencing CH4 emissions, with Ignavibacteriae and Anaerolinea identified as its main hosts. Straw addition likely suppressed N2O emissions by regulating denitrification-related species (e.g., Anaeromyxobacter, Geobacter). N2O emissions were also influenced by mcrA, pmoA, and their hosts, potentially linked to anaerobic ammonium oxidation. This study offers insights into straw's effects on GHG emissions through functional gene and microbial regulation in paddy soils.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Environmental Technology & Innovation Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
435
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Technology & Innovation adopts a challenge-oriented approach to solutions by integrating natural sciences to promote a sustainable future. The journal aims to foster the creation and development of innovative products, technologies, and ideas that enhance the environment, with impacts across soil, air, water, and food in rural and urban areas. As a platform for disseminating scientific evidence for environmental protection and sustainable development, the journal emphasizes fundamental science, methodologies, tools, techniques, and policy considerations. It emphasizes the importance of science and technology in environmental benefits, including smarter, cleaner technologies for environmental protection, more efficient resource processing methods, and the evidence supporting their effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信