Anirudh Gangadhar, Bima J. Hasjim, Xun Zhao, Yingji Sun, Joseph Chon, Aman Sidhu, Elmar Jaeckel, Nazia Selzner, Mark S. Cattral, Blayne A. Sayed, Michael Brudno, Chris McIntosh, Mamatha Bhat
{"title":"用一种新的混杂校正机器学习方法估计活体肝移植的个性化生存效益","authors":"Anirudh Gangadhar, Bima J. Hasjim, Xun Zhao, Yingji Sun, Joseph Chon, Aman Sidhu, Elmar Jaeckel, Nazia Selzner, Mark S. Cattral, Blayne A. Sayed, Michael Brudno, Chris McIntosh, Mamatha Bhat","doi":"10.1016/j.jhep.2025.04.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background & Aims</h3>Many clinical questions, such as estimating survival differences between living donor (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT), are limited to observational studies and cannot be answered through randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Thus, we developed Decision Path Similarity Matching (DPSM), a novel machine learning (ML)-based algorithm that simulates RCT-like conditions to mitigate confounders in observational data.<h3>Methods</h3>We conducted a retrospective study of adult (≥18-years-old) LT candidates between 2002-2023 from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database. A Random Forest (RF) classifier was trained to predict transplant type from clinicodemographic characteristics. After hyperparameter tuning, decision paths for individual patients were extracted and tree-averaged Hamming distances (<span><span style=\"\"><math></math></span><span style=\"font-size: 90%; display: inline-block;\" tabindex=\"0\"></span><script type=\"math/mml\"><math></math></script></span>) were computed for every LDLT-DDLT decision path pair. One-to-one matching was algorithmically performed between LDLT and DDLT patients based on minimizing total <span><span style=\"\"><math></math></span><span style=\"font-size: 90%; display: inline-block;\" tabindex=\"0\"></span><script type=\"math/mml\"><math></math></script></span> across all patient pairs. Random Survival Forest (RSF) models were trained on the matched cohorts to predict post-transplant survival.<h3>Results</h3>Of 72,581 LT recipients, 93.8% were DDLT while 6.2% were LDLT. After matching LDLT with DDLT recipients, DPSM successfully reduced confounding associations as shown by a decrease in AUROC<sub>post-match</sub> from 0.82 to 0.51. Subsequently, RSF (C-index<sub>ldlt</sub>=0.67, C-index<sub>ddlt</sub>=0.74) outperformed the traditional Cox model (C-index<sub>ldlt</sub>=0.57, C-index<sub>ddlt</sub>=0.65). The predicted 10-year mean survival gain of LDLT over DDLT was 10.3% (SD = 5.7%). Particularly, PSC (12.4±5.3%) and HCV (12.1±4.7%) had the highest survival benefits from LDLT compared to other etiologies.<h3>Conclusions</h3>DPSM provides an effective approach for creating RCT-like comparability from observational data to predict which patients will benefit most from LDLT. This novel ML-based methodology enables personalized survival predictions while minimizing confounders and offers clinicians a new tool to more confidently evaluate treatment effects.","PeriodicalId":15888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatology","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":26.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personalized survival benefit estimation from living donor liver transplantation with a novel machine learning method for confounding adjustment\",\"authors\":\"Anirudh Gangadhar, Bima J. Hasjim, Xun Zhao, Yingji Sun, Joseph Chon, Aman Sidhu, Elmar Jaeckel, Nazia Selzner, Mark S. Cattral, Blayne A. Sayed, Michael Brudno, Chris McIntosh, Mamatha Bhat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhep.2025.04.040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Background & Aims</h3>Many clinical questions, such as estimating survival differences between living donor (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT), are limited to observational studies and cannot be answered through randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Thus, we developed Decision Path Similarity Matching (DPSM), a novel machine learning (ML)-based algorithm that simulates RCT-like conditions to mitigate confounders in observational data.<h3>Methods</h3>We conducted a retrospective study of adult (≥18-years-old) LT candidates between 2002-2023 from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database. A Random Forest (RF) classifier was trained to predict transplant type from clinicodemographic characteristics. After hyperparameter tuning, decision paths for individual patients were extracted and tree-averaged Hamming distances (<span><span style=\\\"\\\"><math></math></span><span style=\\\"font-size: 90%; display: inline-block;\\\" tabindex=\\\"0\\\"></span><script type=\\\"math/mml\\\"><math></math></script></span>) were computed for every LDLT-DDLT decision path pair. One-to-one matching was algorithmically performed between LDLT and DDLT patients based on minimizing total <span><span style=\\\"\\\"><math></math></span><span style=\\\"font-size: 90%; display: inline-block;\\\" tabindex=\\\"0\\\"></span><script type=\\\"math/mml\\\"><math></math></script></span> across all patient pairs. Random Survival Forest (RSF) models were trained on the matched cohorts to predict post-transplant survival.<h3>Results</h3>Of 72,581 LT recipients, 93.8% were DDLT while 6.2% were LDLT. After matching LDLT with DDLT recipients, DPSM successfully reduced confounding associations as shown by a decrease in AUROC<sub>post-match</sub> from 0.82 to 0.51. Subsequently, RSF (C-index<sub>ldlt</sub>=0.67, C-index<sub>ddlt</sub>=0.74) outperformed the traditional Cox model (C-index<sub>ldlt</sub>=0.57, C-index<sub>ddlt</sub>=0.65). The predicted 10-year mean survival gain of LDLT over DDLT was 10.3% (SD = 5.7%). Particularly, PSC (12.4±5.3%) and HCV (12.1±4.7%) had the highest survival benefits from LDLT compared to other etiologies.<h3>Conclusions</h3>DPSM provides an effective approach for creating RCT-like comparability from observational data to predict which patients will benefit most from LDLT. This novel ML-based methodology enables personalized survival predictions while minimizing confounders and offers clinicians a new tool to more confidently evaluate treatment effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepatology\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":26.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2025.04.040\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2025.04.040","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Personalized survival benefit estimation from living donor liver transplantation with a novel machine learning method for confounding adjustment
Background & Aims
Many clinical questions, such as estimating survival differences between living donor (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT), are limited to observational studies and cannot be answered through randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Thus, we developed Decision Path Similarity Matching (DPSM), a novel machine learning (ML)-based algorithm that simulates RCT-like conditions to mitigate confounders in observational data.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective study of adult (≥18-years-old) LT candidates between 2002-2023 from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database. A Random Forest (RF) classifier was trained to predict transplant type from clinicodemographic characteristics. After hyperparameter tuning, decision paths for individual patients were extracted and tree-averaged Hamming distances () were computed for every LDLT-DDLT decision path pair. One-to-one matching was algorithmically performed between LDLT and DDLT patients based on minimizing total across all patient pairs. Random Survival Forest (RSF) models were trained on the matched cohorts to predict post-transplant survival.
Results
Of 72,581 LT recipients, 93.8% were DDLT while 6.2% were LDLT. After matching LDLT with DDLT recipients, DPSM successfully reduced confounding associations as shown by a decrease in AUROCpost-match from 0.82 to 0.51. Subsequently, RSF (C-indexldlt=0.67, C-indexddlt=0.74) outperformed the traditional Cox model (C-indexldlt=0.57, C-indexddlt=0.65). The predicted 10-year mean survival gain of LDLT over DDLT was 10.3% (SD = 5.7%). Particularly, PSC (12.4±5.3%) and HCV (12.1±4.7%) had the highest survival benefits from LDLT compared to other etiologies.
Conclusions
DPSM provides an effective approach for creating RCT-like comparability from observational data to predict which patients will benefit most from LDLT. This novel ML-based methodology enables personalized survival predictions while minimizing confounders and offers clinicians a new tool to more confidently evaluate treatment effects.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hepatology is the official publication of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). It is dedicated to presenting clinical and basic research in the field of hepatology through original papers, reviews, case reports, and letters to the Editor. The Journal is published in English and may consider supplements that pass an editorial review.