在不适合移植的多发性骨髓瘤中,Daratumumab和错失的测序机会:对未来试验的教训

IF 81.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Ghulam Rehman Mohyuddin, Aaron M. Goodman
{"title":"在不适合移植的多发性骨髓瘤中,Daratumumab和错失的测序机会:对未来试验的教训","authors":"Ghulam Rehman Mohyuddin, Aaron M. Goodman","doi":"10.1038/s41571-025-01034-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In pivotal trials testing daratumumab in patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, inadequate crossover provisions have not only compromised the interpretation of survival data but also left fundamental questions about optimal treatment sequencing unanswered. Herein, we address the ethical implications of trial designs that fail to guarantee access to effective post-progression therapy for patients in the control arm, particularly in studies across regions in which standard-of-care treatment varies dramatically.","PeriodicalId":19079,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":81.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Daratumumab and missed sequencing opportunities in transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: lessons for future trials\",\"authors\":\"Ghulam Rehman Mohyuddin, Aaron M. Goodman\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41571-025-01034-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In pivotal trials testing daratumumab in patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, inadequate crossover provisions have not only compromised the interpretation of survival data but also left fundamental questions about optimal treatment sequencing unanswered. Herein, we address the ethical implications of trial designs that fail to guarantee access to effective post-progression therapy for patients in the control arm, particularly in studies across regions in which standard-of-care treatment varies dramatically.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":81.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-025-01034-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-025-01034-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在对新诊断的不适合移植的多发性骨髓瘤患者测试daratumumab的关键试验中,不充分的交叉规定不仅损害了生存数据的解释,而且还留下了关于最佳治疗序列的基本问题。在此,我们讨论了不能保证对照组患者获得有效进展后治疗的试验设计的伦理意义,特别是在标准治疗差异很大的地区的研究中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Daratumumab and missed sequencing opportunities in transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: lessons for future trials
In pivotal trials testing daratumumab in patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, inadequate crossover provisions have not only compromised the interpretation of survival data but also left fundamental questions about optimal treatment sequencing unanswered. Herein, we address the ethical implications of trial designs that fail to guarantee access to effective post-progression therapy for patients in the control arm, particularly in studies across regions in which standard-of-care treatment varies dramatically.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
99.40
自引率
0.40%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews publishes clinical content authored by internationally renowned clinical academics and researchers, catering to readers in the medical sciences at postgraduate levels and beyond. Although targeted at practicing doctors, researchers, and academics within specific specialties, the aim is to ensure accessibility for readers across various medical disciplines. The journal features in-depth Reviews offering authoritative and current information, contextualizing topics within the history and development of a field. Perspectives, News & Views articles, and the Research Highlights section provide topical discussions, opinions, and filtered primary research from diverse medical journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信