{"title":"将心理预防干预措施与解决低收入和中等收入国家心理健康的社会决定因素的干预措施相结合的有效性:系统审查和荟萃分析。","authors":"Eleonora Prina, Beatrice Bano, Rakesh Singh, Emiliano Albanese, Daniela Trujillo, Maria Cecilia Dedios Sanguineti, Katherine Sorsdahl, Nagendra Luitel, Emily Garman, Marianna Purgato, Corrado Barbui, Mark Jordans, Crick Lund","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Question: </strong>Task-shared preventive psychological interventions combined with interventions addressing social determinants of mental health may prevent common mental health conditions (CMHCs), particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, an evidence synthesis of their combination has not yet been investigated. We aimed to systematically assess the effectiveness of these combined interventions in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Study selection and analysis: </strong>We searched Epistemonikos, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, GIM, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP until 2 September 2024. Two reviewers independently abstracted the data and evaluated the risk of bias of included studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. We performed random-effects meta-analyses to assess the primary outcome, which was the incidence of CMHCs, and rated the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023451072).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of the 21 780 records identified from electronic sources, we included 31 randomised controlled trials from 21 LMICs involving 35 885 participants. Combined interventions were effective in reducing the incidence of depression and post-traumatic stress disorders at postintervention compared with control conditions for adults (risk ratio (RR) 0.82, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.93) and children (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.99). At 7-24 months, we only found beneficial effects of combined interventions for depressive symptoms in children (standardised mean difference -0.41, 95% CI -0.63 to -0.18). No data were available on the incidence of anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined task-shared interventions are effective in mostly short-term prevention of CMHCs in LMICs. Combining strategies targeting social determinants with psychological prevention approaches offers a potential opportunity to reduce the global mental health burden. Future research should focus on key intervention components and head-to-head comparisons between different interventions and between their components.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42023451072.</p>","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107591/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of combining psychological prevention interventions with interventions that address the social determinants of mental health in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Eleonora Prina, Beatrice Bano, Rakesh Singh, Emiliano Albanese, Daniela Trujillo, Maria Cecilia Dedios Sanguineti, Katherine Sorsdahl, Nagendra Luitel, Emily Garman, Marianna Purgato, Corrado Barbui, Mark Jordans, Crick Lund\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Question: </strong>Task-shared preventive psychological interventions combined with interventions addressing social determinants of mental health may prevent common mental health conditions (CMHCs), particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, an evidence synthesis of their combination has not yet been investigated. We aimed to systematically assess the effectiveness of these combined interventions in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Study selection and analysis: </strong>We searched Epistemonikos, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, GIM, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP until 2 September 2024. Two reviewers independently abstracted the data and evaluated the risk of bias of included studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. We performed random-effects meta-analyses to assess the primary outcome, which was the incidence of CMHCs, and rated the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023451072).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of the 21 780 records identified from electronic sources, we included 31 randomised controlled trials from 21 LMICs involving 35 885 participants. Combined interventions were effective in reducing the incidence of depression and post-traumatic stress disorders at postintervention compared with control conditions for adults (risk ratio (RR) 0.82, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.93) and children (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.99). At 7-24 months, we only found beneficial effects of combined interventions for depressive symptoms in children (standardised mean difference -0.41, 95% CI -0.63 to -0.18). No data were available on the incidence of anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined task-shared interventions are effective in mostly short-term prevention of CMHCs in LMICs. Combining strategies targeting social determinants with psychological prevention approaches offers a potential opportunity to reduce the global mental health burden. Future research should focus on key intervention components and head-to-head comparisons between different interventions and between their components.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42023451072.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ mental health\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107591/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-301573\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-301573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
问题:分担任务的预防性心理干预措施与针对心理健康社会决定因素的干预措施相结合,可以预防常见的心理健康状况,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。然而,他们的组合的证据合成尚未调查。我们的目的是系统地评估这些联合干预措施在中低收入国家的有效性。研究选择和分析:我们检索了Epistemonikos、CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL、GIM、ClinicalTrials.gov和WHO ICTRP,检索截止日期为2024年9月2日。两位审稿人独立提取数据,并使用Cochrane risk of bias 2工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析来评估主要结局,即CMHCs的发生率,并使用分级推荐评估、发展和评估方法对证据的确定性进行了评级。该协议在PROSPERO (CRD42023451072)中注册。研究结果:在从电子来源确定的21780份记录中,我们纳入了来自21个低收入国家的31项随机对照试验,涉及35 885名参与者。与对照组相比,联合干预有效地降低了成人(风险比(RR) 0.82, 95% CI 0.73至0.93)和儿童(RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49至0.99)干预后抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍的发生率。在7-24个月时,我们只发现联合干预对儿童抑郁症状的有益效果(标准化平均差为-0.41,95% CI为-0.63至-0.18)。没有关于焦虑发生率的数据。结论:联合任务分担干预在中低收入国家的CMHCs短期预防中是有效的。将针对社会决定因素的战略与心理预防方法相结合,为减少全球精神卫生负担提供了一个潜在的机会。未来的研究应集中在关键的干预成分和不同干预之间及其成分之间的直接比较。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42023451072。
Effectiveness of combining psychological prevention interventions with interventions that address the social determinants of mental health in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Question: Task-shared preventive psychological interventions combined with interventions addressing social determinants of mental health may prevent common mental health conditions (CMHCs), particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, an evidence synthesis of their combination has not yet been investigated. We aimed to systematically assess the effectiveness of these combined interventions in LMICs.
Study selection and analysis: We searched Epistemonikos, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, GIM, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP until 2 September 2024. Two reviewers independently abstracted the data and evaluated the risk of bias of included studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. We performed random-effects meta-analyses to assess the primary outcome, which was the incidence of CMHCs, and rated the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023451072).
Findings: Of the 21 780 records identified from electronic sources, we included 31 randomised controlled trials from 21 LMICs involving 35 885 participants. Combined interventions were effective in reducing the incidence of depression and post-traumatic stress disorders at postintervention compared with control conditions for adults (risk ratio (RR) 0.82, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.93) and children (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.99). At 7-24 months, we only found beneficial effects of combined interventions for depressive symptoms in children (standardised mean difference -0.41, 95% CI -0.63 to -0.18). No data were available on the incidence of anxiety.
Conclusions: Combined task-shared interventions are effective in mostly short-term prevention of CMHCs in LMICs. Combining strategies targeting social determinants with psychological prevention approaches offers a potential opportunity to reduce the global mental health burden. Future research should focus on key intervention components and head-to-head comparisons between different interventions and between their components.