前交叉韧带重建手术前后参与者的实验室外纵向步态评估:一项观察性纵向研究。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Tomer Yona, Bezalel Peskin, Arielle Fischer
{"title":"前交叉韧带重建手术前后参与者的实验室外纵向步态评估:一项观察性纵向研究。","authors":"Tomer Yona, Bezalel Peskin, Arielle Fischer","doi":"10.4085/1062-6050-0423.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the longitudinal changes in knee sagittal kinematics pre- and post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) during varying walking speeds in non-laboratory environments. A secondary objective describing the hip and ankle joint kinematics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Longitudinal observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>Forty ACLR patients and 17 healthy matched controls were recruited.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Knee joint sagittal kinematics measured using seven inertial measurement units at pre-surgery, three-, and five-months post-surgery while walking at slow, normal, and fast speeds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At pre-surgery, compared to the contralateral limb, the injured knee exhibited greater minimum flexion during normal and fast walking (p≤.008) and exhibited less knee flexion at the first peak (p=.006). SPM revealed significant differences throughout the gait cycle at all speeds (p≤.033). Compared to controls, the injured knee had greater minimum flexion during normal and slow walking (p≤.025). At three months, compared to the contralateral limb, the injured knee showed increased minimum flexion across all speeds (p≤.005) and exhibited less knee flexion at the first peak during fast walking (p<.001). SPM indicated significant differences throughout the gait cycle at all speeds (p≤.028). Compared to controls, the injured knee remained more flexed at the minimum angle across all speeds (p<.001) and exhibited less knee flexion at the first peak during slow walking (p=.031). At five months, differences between limbs were reduced, with significant differences in minimum flexion at all speeds (p≤.027). SPM differences were limited to specific gait cycle portions during normal and fast walking (p≤.011). Compared to controls, the injured knee remained more flexed at the minimum angle during slow and normal walking (p≤.005). Lastly, hip adaptations resolved while ankle asymmetries persisted during terminal stance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ACLR patients demonstrated progressive improvements in knee sagittal kinematics, indicating a recovery trend. However, the recovery was non-linear across different walking speeds.</p>","PeriodicalId":54875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Athletic Training","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Out of Lab Longitudinal Gait Assessment of Participants Pre and Post Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery: An Observational Longitudinal Study.\",\"authors\":\"Tomer Yona, Bezalel Peskin, Arielle Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.4085/1062-6050-0423.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the longitudinal changes in knee sagittal kinematics pre- and post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) during varying walking speeds in non-laboratory environments. A secondary objective describing the hip and ankle joint kinematics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Longitudinal observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>Forty ACLR patients and 17 healthy matched controls were recruited.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Knee joint sagittal kinematics measured using seven inertial measurement units at pre-surgery, three-, and five-months post-surgery while walking at slow, normal, and fast speeds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At pre-surgery, compared to the contralateral limb, the injured knee exhibited greater minimum flexion during normal and fast walking (p≤.008) and exhibited less knee flexion at the first peak (p=.006). SPM revealed significant differences throughout the gait cycle at all speeds (p≤.033). Compared to controls, the injured knee had greater minimum flexion during normal and slow walking (p≤.025). At three months, compared to the contralateral limb, the injured knee showed increased minimum flexion across all speeds (p≤.005) and exhibited less knee flexion at the first peak during fast walking (p<.001). SPM indicated significant differences throughout the gait cycle at all speeds (p≤.028). Compared to controls, the injured knee remained more flexed at the minimum angle across all speeds (p<.001) and exhibited less knee flexion at the first peak during slow walking (p=.031). At five months, differences between limbs were reduced, with significant differences in minimum flexion at all speeds (p≤.027). SPM differences were limited to specific gait cycle portions during normal and fast walking (p≤.011). Compared to controls, the injured knee remained more flexed at the minimum angle during slow and normal walking (p≤.005). Lastly, hip adaptations resolved while ankle asymmetries persisted during terminal stance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ACLR patients demonstrated progressive improvements in knee sagittal kinematics, indicating a recovery trend. However, the recovery was non-linear across different walking speeds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Athletic Training\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Athletic Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0423.24\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Athletic Training","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0423.24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价非实验室环境下不同步行速度下前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)前后膝关节矢状位运动学的纵向变化。第二个目标是描述髋关节和踝关节的运动学。设计:纵向观察研究。设置:医院。患者或其他参与者:招募了40名ACLR患者和17名健康匹配的对照组。主要结果测量:在术前、术后3个月和5个月,以慢速、正常和快速行走时,使用7个惯性测量单元测量膝关节矢状位运动学。结果:术前,与对侧肢体相比,损伤膝关节在正常和快速行走时表现出更大的最小屈曲(p≤0.008),而在第一个峰值时表现出更小的屈曲(p= 0.006)。在所有速度下,SPM在整个步态周期中显示出显著差异(p≤0.033)。与对照组相比,在正常和缓慢行走时,受伤的膝盖有更大的最小屈曲(p≤0.025)。在3个月时,与对侧肢体相比,受伤的膝关节在所有速度下的最小屈曲度都增加了(p≤0.005),并且在快速行走时的第一个峰值时膝关节屈曲度更少(结论:ACLR患者的膝关节矢状位运动学表现出进行性改善,表明恢复趋势。然而,在不同的步行速度下,恢复是非线性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Out of Lab Longitudinal Gait Assessment of Participants Pre and Post Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery: An Observational Longitudinal Study.

Objective: To evaluate the longitudinal changes in knee sagittal kinematics pre- and post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) during varying walking speeds in non-laboratory environments. A secondary objective describing the hip and ankle joint kinematics.

Design: Longitudinal observational study.

Setting: Hospital.

Patients or other participants: Forty ACLR patients and 17 healthy matched controls were recruited.

Main outcome measure(s): Knee joint sagittal kinematics measured using seven inertial measurement units at pre-surgery, three-, and five-months post-surgery while walking at slow, normal, and fast speeds.

Results: At pre-surgery, compared to the contralateral limb, the injured knee exhibited greater minimum flexion during normal and fast walking (p≤.008) and exhibited less knee flexion at the first peak (p=.006). SPM revealed significant differences throughout the gait cycle at all speeds (p≤.033). Compared to controls, the injured knee had greater minimum flexion during normal and slow walking (p≤.025). At three months, compared to the contralateral limb, the injured knee showed increased minimum flexion across all speeds (p≤.005) and exhibited less knee flexion at the first peak during fast walking (p<.001). SPM indicated significant differences throughout the gait cycle at all speeds (p≤.028). Compared to controls, the injured knee remained more flexed at the minimum angle across all speeds (p<.001) and exhibited less knee flexion at the first peak during slow walking (p=.031). At five months, differences between limbs were reduced, with significant differences in minimum flexion at all speeds (p≤.027). SPM differences were limited to specific gait cycle portions during normal and fast walking (p≤.011). Compared to controls, the injured knee remained more flexed at the minimum angle during slow and normal walking (p≤.005). Lastly, hip adaptations resolved while ankle asymmetries persisted during terminal stance.

Conclusions: ACLR patients demonstrated progressive improvements in knee sagittal kinematics, indicating a recovery trend. However, the recovery was non-linear across different walking speeds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Athletic Training
Journal of Athletic Training 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Athletic Training is to enhance communication among professionals interested in the quality of health care for the physically active through education and research in prevention, evaluation, management and rehabilitation of injuries. The Journal of Athletic Training offers research you can use in daily practice. It keeps you abreast of scientific advancements that ultimately define professional standards of care - something you can''t be without if you''re responsible for the well-being of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信