淡水鱼类捕食者生态位分配的生态系统、空间和营养维度。

IF 3.4 1区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Milan Říha, Lukáš Vejřík, Rubén Rabaneda-Bueno, Ivan Jarić, Marie Prchalová, Ivana Vejříková, Marek Šmejkal, Petr Blabolil, Martin Čech, Vladislav Draštík, Michaela Holubová, Tomáš Jůza, Karl Ø Gjelland, Zuzana Sajdlová, Luboš Kočvara, Michal Tušer, Jiří Peterka
{"title":"淡水鱼类捕食者生态位分配的生态系统、空间和营养维度。","authors":"Milan Říha, Lukáš Vejřík, Rubén Rabaneda-Bueno, Ivan Jarić, Marie Prchalová, Ivana Vejříková, Marek Šmejkal, Petr Blabolil, Martin Čech, Vladislav Draštík, Michaela Holubová, Tomáš Jůza, Karl Ø Gjelland, Zuzana Sajdlová, Luboš Kočvara, Michal Tušer, Jiří Peterka","doi":"10.1186/s40462-025-00559-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Niche partitioning allows species to diversify resource utilisation and space allocation and reduce interspecific competition. Variations in abiotic and biotic conditions in different ecosystems may further influence resource availability and habitat utilisation, potentially reducing competition. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of environmental variation on spatial and trophic niche overlap between two freshwater apex predators, the northern pike (Esox lucius) and the European catfish (Silurus glanis), in three different water bodies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used fine-scale acoustic telemetry to assess the spatial niche overlap of pike and catfish, analyzing their spatial and habitat use in relation to the thermocline and their presence in benthic versus open-water habitats. Stable isotope analysis (SIA) was used to quantify trophic niche overlap and dietary differences between the species. We compared the habitat use, spatial niche width and overlap, and trophic differentiation among waterbodies to determine how environmental conditions influence predator interactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During summer, pike and catfish primarily occupied benthic habitats above the thermocline across all waterbodies and diel periods. However, catfish more frequently used open water above the thermocline, while pike were more often present in both open water and benthic habitats below it. While this general pattern of habitat use was consistent, its extent varied among lakes, suggesting that local environmental conditions shape species-specific habitat selection. Despite these variations, the species exhibited substantial spatial overlap, though its magnitude fluctuated across waterbodies and diel periods. Catfish occupied a broader spatial niche in two waterbodies, while pike had a broader niche in one. Across all lakes, catfish consistently maintained a broader trophic niche than pike. However, pike exhibited higher trophic overlap with catfish than vice versa, with nearly complete overlap in one lake and substantial but incomplete overlap in others. This suggests that pike relies more heavily on shared prey resources, while catfish exploits a broader range of food sources beyond those used by pike.These patterns were primarily driven by the position of the thermocline, prey availability, structural complexity and the greater foraging plasticity of catfish, highlighting the environmental dependence of niche partitioning in these predators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that spatial and trophic niche overlaps between pike and catfish are highly context-dependent, shaped by abiotic conditions, prey availability, and species-specific foraging strategies. This study highlights the importance of integrating spatial and trophic analyses to understand predator interactions in aquatic ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":54288,"journal":{"name":"Movement Ecology","volume":"13 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecosystem, spatial and trophic dimensions of niche partitioning among freshwater fish predators.\",\"authors\":\"Milan Říha, Lukáš Vejřík, Rubén Rabaneda-Bueno, Ivan Jarić, Marie Prchalová, Ivana Vejříková, Marek Šmejkal, Petr Blabolil, Martin Čech, Vladislav Draštík, Michaela Holubová, Tomáš Jůza, Karl Ø Gjelland, Zuzana Sajdlová, Luboš Kočvara, Michal Tušer, Jiří Peterka\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40462-025-00559-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Niche partitioning allows species to diversify resource utilisation and space allocation and reduce interspecific competition. Variations in abiotic and biotic conditions in different ecosystems may further influence resource availability and habitat utilisation, potentially reducing competition. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of environmental variation on spatial and trophic niche overlap between two freshwater apex predators, the northern pike (Esox lucius) and the European catfish (Silurus glanis), in three different water bodies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used fine-scale acoustic telemetry to assess the spatial niche overlap of pike and catfish, analyzing their spatial and habitat use in relation to the thermocline and their presence in benthic versus open-water habitats. Stable isotope analysis (SIA) was used to quantify trophic niche overlap and dietary differences between the species. We compared the habitat use, spatial niche width and overlap, and trophic differentiation among waterbodies to determine how environmental conditions influence predator interactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During summer, pike and catfish primarily occupied benthic habitats above the thermocline across all waterbodies and diel periods. However, catfish more frequently used open water above the thermocline, while pike were more often present in both open water and benthic habitats below it. While this general pattern of habitat use was consistent, its extent varied among lakes, suggesting that local environmental conditions shape species-specific habitat selection. Despite these variations, the species exhibited substantial spatial overlap, though its magnitude fluctuated across waterbodies and diel periods. Catfish occupied a broader spatial niche in two waterbodies, while pike had a broader niche in one. Across all lakes, catfish consistently maintained a broader trophic niche than pike. However, pike exhibited higher trophic overlap with catfish than vice versa, with nearly complete overlap in one lake and substantial but incomplete overlap in others. This suggests that pike relies more heavily on shared prey resources, while catfish exploits a broader range of food sources beyond those used by pike.These patterns were primarily driven by the position of the thermocline, prey availability, structural complexity and the greater foraging plasticity of catfish, highlighting the environmental dependence of niche partitioning in these predators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that spatial and trophic niche overlaps between pike and catfish are highly context-dependent, shaped by abiotic conditions, prey availability, and species-specific foraging strategies. This study highlights the importance of integrating spatial and trophic analyses to understand predator interactions in aquatic ecosystems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Movement Ecology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107910/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Movement Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-025-00559-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-025-00559-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:生态位划分可以使物种资源利用和空间分配多样化,减少种间竞争。不同生态系统中非生物和生物条件的变化可能进一步影响资源的可得性和生境的利用,从而可能减少竞争。摘要本研究旨在探讨三种不同水体中环境变化对北梭子鱼(Esox lucius)和欧洲鲶鱼(Silurus glanis)两种淡水顶端捕食者空间和营养生态位重叠的影响。方法:采用精细尺度声学遥测技术对梭子鱼和鲶鱼的空间生态位重叠进行了评估,分析了它们的空间和栖息地利用与温跃层的关系,以及它们在底栖动物和开放水域栖息地的存在。利用稳定同位素分析(SIA)量化了不同物种间的营养生态位重叠和饮食差异。我们比较了生境利用、空间生态位宽度和重叠以及水体间的营养分化,以确定环境条件如何影响捕食者的相互作用。结果:在夏季,梭鱼和鲶鱼主要占据温跃层以上的底栖动物栖息地。然而,鲶鱼更频繁地在温跃层以上的开放水域活动,而梭子鱼更经常出现在温跃层以下的开放水域和底栖动物栖息地。虽然这种生境利用的总体模式是一致的,但其程度因湖而异,表明当地环境条件决定了物种特有的生境选择。尽管存在这些差异,但物种表现出大量的空间重叠,尽管其大小在水体和死亡时期有所波动。鲶鱼在两个水体中占据了更广阔的空间生态位,而梭子鱼在一个水体中占据了更广阔的空间生态位。在所有湖泊中,鲶鱼始终保持着比梭子鱼更广泛的营养生态位。然而,梭子鱼与鲶鱼表现出更高的营养重叠,在一个湖泊中几乎完全重叠,在其他湖泊中有大量但不完全重叠。这表明梭子鱼更依赖于共享的猎物资源,而鲶鱼则利用比梭子鱼更广泛的食物来源。这些模式主要受温跃层位置、猎物可用性、结构复杂性和更大的觅食可塑性的驱动,突出了这些捕食者生态位分配的环境依赖性。结论:我们的研究结果表明,梭鱼和鲶鱼之间的空间和营养生态位重叠是高度依赖于环境的,受非生物条件、猎物可用性和物种特异性觅食策略的影响。这项研究强调了整合空间和营养分析对理解水生生态系统中捕食者相互作用的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecosystem, spatial and trophic dimensions of niche partitioning among freshwater fish predators.

Background: Niche partitioning allows species to diversify resource utilisation and space allocation and reduce interspecific competition. Variations in abiotic and biotic conditions in different ecosystems may further influence resource availability and habitat utilisation, potentially reducing competition. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of environmental variation on spatial and trophic niche overlap between two freshwater apex predators, the northern pike (Esox lucius) and the European catfish (Silurus glanis), in three different water bodies.

Methods: We used fine-scale acoustic telemetry to assess the spatial niche overlap of pike and catfish, analyzing their spatial and habitat use in relation to the thermocline and their presence in benthic versus open-water habitats. Stable isotope analysis (SIA) was used to quantify trophic niche overlap and dietary differences between the species. We compared the habitat use, spatial niche width and overlap, and trophic differentiation among waterbodies to determine how environmental conditions influence predator interactions.

Results: During summer, pike and catfish primarily occupied benthic habitats above the thermocline across all waterbodies and diel periods. However, catfish more frequently used open water above the thermocline, while pike were more often present in both open water and benthic habitats below it. While this general pattern of habitat use was consistent, its extent varied among lakes, suggesting that local environmental conditions shape species-specific habitat selection. Despite these variations, the species exhibited substantial spatial overlap, though its magnitude fluctuated across waterbodies and diel periods. Catfish occupied a broader spatial niche in two waterbodies, while pike had a broader niche in one. Across all lakes, catfish consistently maintained a broader trophic niche than pike. However, pike exhibited higher trophic overlap with catfish than vice versa, with nearly complete overlap in one lake and substantial but incomplete overlap in others. This suggests that pike relies more heavily on shared prey resources, while catfish exploits a broader range of food sources beyond those used by pike.These patterns were primarily driven by the position of the thermocline, prey availability, structural complexity and the greater foraging plasticity of catfish, highlighting the environmental dependence of niche partitioning in these predators.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that spatial and trophic niche overlaps between pike and catfish are highly context-dependent, shaped by abiotic conditions, prey availability, and species-specific foraging strategies. This study highlights the importance of integrating spatial and trophic analyses to understand predator interactions in aquatic ecosystems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Movement Ecology
Movement Ecology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
47
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Movement Ecology is an open-access interdisciplinary journal publishing novel insights from empirical and theoretical approaches into the ecology of movement of the whole organism - either animals, plants or microorganisms - as the central theme. We welcome manuscripts on any taxa and any movement phenomena (e.g. foraging, dispersal and seasonal migration) addressing important research questions on the patterns, mechanisms, causes and consequences of organismal movement. Manuscripts will be rigorously peer-reviewed to ensure novelty and high quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信