Griffin R Moon, Brian K Leary, Anh-Dung Nguyen, Jean L McCrory
{"title":"使用可穿戴传感器在跑道、沥青、草地和跑步机上跑步的生物力学比较。","authors":"Griffin R Moon, Brian K Leary, Anh-Dung Nguyen, Jean L McCrory","doi":"10.1080/14763141.2025.2511766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) allow assessment of running biomechanics outdoors on various surfaces. The purpose of our study was to compare peak tibial acceleration (PTA), stance time (ST), stride frequency (SF), and maximum rearfoot eversion velocity (MREV) when running on asphalt, track, grass, and on a treadmill. Twenty healthy participants ran on each surface at their self-selected speed. IMUs were placed on their right tibia and posterior aspect of their right shoe. A timing system was used to ensure consistent speed between surfaces. Thirty steps from each surface were analysed. Separate repeated measures ANOVAs or Friedman tests were performed on each dependent measure, depending on normality. Post-hoc analyses were performed when appropriate. SF, PTA, and MREV differed (<i>p</i> < .001) between surfaces. SF was highest on treadmill (83.4 ± 5.4 strides/sec) and slowest on grass (81.0 ± 4.2 strides/min). PTA was greater outdoors (asphalt: 11.0 ± 2.7 g, grass: 10.7 ± 3.4 g, and track: 10.6 ± 2.3 g), but less on treadmill (7.9 ± 1.6 g). MREV was lowest on grass (394.9 ± 256.5 deg/s) and greatest on track (623.5 ± 299.3 deg/s) and asphalt (620.7 ± 289.1 deg/sec). ST did not differ between surfaces (<i>p</i> = .231). Laboratory-based studies on running biomechanics may not reflect the running gait used on outdoor running surfaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":49482,"journal":{"name":"Sports Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of running biomechanics on track, asphalt, grass, and treadmill using wearable sensors.\",\"authors\":\"Griffin R Moon, Brian K Leary, Anh-Dung Nguyen, Jean L McCrory\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14763141.2025.2511766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) allow assessment of running biomechanics outdoors on various surfaces. The purpose of our study was to compare peak tibial acceleration (PTA), stance time (ST), stride frequency (SF), and maximum rearfoot eversion velocity (MREV) when running on asphalt, track, grass, and on a treadmill. Twenty healthy participants ran on each surface at their self-selected speed. IMUs were placed on their right tibia and posterior aspect of their right shoe. A timing system was used to ensure consistent speed between surfaces. Thirty steps from each surface were analysed. Separate repeated measures ANOVAs or Friedman tests were performed on each dependent measure, depending on normality. Post-hoc analyses were performed when appropriate. SF, PTA, and MREV differed (<i>p</i> < .001) between surfaces. SF was highest on treadmill (83.4 ± 5.4 strides/sec) and slowest on grass (81.0 ± 4.2 strides/min). PTA was greater outdoors (asphalt: 11.0 ± 2.7 g, grass: 10.7 ± 3.4 g, and track: 10.6 ± 2.3 g), but less on treadmill (7.9 ± 1.6 g). MREV was lowest on grass (394.9 ± 256.5 deg/s) and greatest on track (623.5 ± 299.3 deg/s) and asphalt (620.7 ± 289.1 deg/sec). ST did not differ between surfaces (<i>p</i> = .231). Laboratory-based studies on running biomechanics may not reflect the running gait used on outdoor running surfaces.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2025.2511766\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2025.2511766","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
惯性测量单元(imu)允许在户外各种表面上评估跑步生物力学。我们研究的目的是比较在沥青、跑道、草地和跑步机上跑步时的峰值胫骨加速度(PTA)、站立时间(ST)、步幅频率(SF)和最大后足外翻速度(MREV)。20名健康的参与者以他们自己选择的速度在每个表面上跑步。imu放置在右胫骨和右鞋后部。一个定时系统用于确保表面之间的速度一致。对每个表面的30个步骤进行分析。根据正态性,对每个相关测量进行单独的重复测量anova或Friedman检验。适当时进行事后分析。SF、PTA、MREV差异有统计学意义(p p = 0.231)。基于实验室的跑步生物力学研究可能无法反映室外跑步地面上使用的跑步步态。
A comparison of running biomechanics on track, asphalt, grass, and treadmill using wearable sensors.
Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) allow assessment of running biomechanics outdoors on various surfaces. The purpose of our study was to compare peak tibial acceleration (PTA), stance time (ST), stride frequency (SF), and maximum rearfoot eversion velocity (MREV) when running on asphalt, track, grass, and on a treadmill. Twenty healthy participants ran on each surface at their self-selected speed. IMUs were placed on their right tibia and posterior aspect of their right shoe. A timing system was used to ensure consistent speed between surfaces. Thirty steps from each surface were analysed. Separate repeated measures ANOVAs or Friedman tests were performed on each dependent measure, depending on normality. Post-hoc analyses were performed when appropriate. SF, PTA, and MREV differed (p < .001) between surfaces. SF was highest on treadmill (83.4 ± 5.4 strides/sec) and slowest on grass (81.0 ± 4.2 strides/min). PTA was greater outdoors (asphalt: 11.0 ± 2.7 g, grass: 10.7 ± 3.4 g, and track: 10.6 ± 2.3 g), but less on treadmill (7.9 ± 1.6 g). MREV was lowest on grass (394.9 ± 256.5 deg/s) and greatest on track (623.5 ± 299.3 deg/s) and asphalt (620.7 ± 289.1 deg/sec). ST did not differ between surfaces (p = .231). Laboratory-based studies on running biomechanics may not reflect the running gait used on outdoor running surfaces.
期刊介绍:
Sports Biomechanics is the Thomson Reuters listed scientific journal of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports (ISBS). The journal sets out to generate knowledge to improve human performance and reduce the incidence of injury, and to communicate this knowledge to scientists, coaches, clinicians, teachers, and participants. The target performance realms include not only the conventional areas of sports and exercise, but also fundamental motor skills and other highly specialized human movements such as dance (both sport and artistic).
Sports Biomechanics is unique in its emphasis on a broad biomechanical spectrum of human performance including, but not limited to, technique, skill acquisition, training, strength and conditioning, exercise, coaching, teaching, equipment, modeling and simulation, measurement, and injury prevention and rehabilitation. As well as maintaining scientific rigour, there is a strong editorial emphasis on ''reader friendliness''. By emphasising the practical implications and applications of research, the journal seeks to benefit practitioners directly.
Sports Biomechanics publishes papers in four sections: Original Research, Reviews, Teaching, and Methods and Theoretical Perspectives.