主要情绪障碍的家族性风险与默认模式、认知执行和显著性网络中的脑功能连接。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-05-27 Print Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1503/jpn.250002
Daniel Murage, Anna Nazarova, Vladislav Drobinin, Nitya Adepalli, Carl A Helmick, Matthias H Schmidt, Aaron J Newman, Christopher V Bowen, Rudolf Uher
{"title":"主要情绪障碍的家族性风险与默认模式、认知执行和显著性网络中的脑功能连接。","authors":"Daniel Murage, Anna Nazarova, Vladislav Drobinin, Nitya Adepalli, Carl A Helmick, Matthias H Schmidt, Aaron J Newman, Christopher V Bowen, Rudolf Uher","doi":"10.1503/jpn.250002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mood disorders, including depressive and bipolar disorders, begin in late adolescence to early adulthood, tend to run in families, and present early with subthreshold symptoms. They have been associated with differential connectivity in 3 core networks: the default mode network (DMN), cognitive executive network (CEN), and salience network (SN), but it remains unclear whether differences in connectivity in the DMN, CEN, and SN are associated with familial risk for mood disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited youth aged 9-19 years, including offspring of parents with major depressive or bipolar disorders (familial high risk [FHR]) and offspring of parents with no mood disorder (controls) for a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. We tested associations between family history of major mood disorders and connectivity within and between the DMN, CEN, and SN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 215 youth: 126 at FHR with a mean age of 13.38 (standard deviation [SD] 2.91) years and 79 controls with a mean age of 13.17 (SD 2.67) years. Mean connectivity in the DMN (β = 0.003, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.023 to 0.029), CEN (β = -0.009, 95% CI, -0.070 to 0.089), and SN (β = -0.010, 95% CI -0.071 to 0.051) in the FHR group was similar to that of controls. Moreover, DMN, CEN, and SN connectivity was not significantly associated with depressive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Given that brain connectivity changes over the developmental period, longitudinal studies would improve understanding of how this change occurs in familial risk groups to identify critical time periods for intervention or prevention of mood disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Connectivity within and between the DMN, CEN, and SN is not a neural indicator of familial risk for major mood disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":50073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","volume":"50 3","pages":"E181-E193"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Familial risk of major mood disorders and brain functional connectivity in the default mode, cognitive executive, and salience networks.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Murage, Anna Nazarova, Vladislav Drobinin, Nitya Adepalli, Carl A Helmick, Matthias H Schmidt, Aaron J Newman, Christopher V Bowen, Rudolf Uher\",\"doi\":\"10.1503/jpn.250002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mood disorders, including depressive and bipolar disorders, begin in late adolescence to early adulthood, tend to run in families, and present early with subthreshold symptoms. They have been associated with differential connectivity in 3 core networks: the default mode network (DMN), cognitive executive network (CEN), and salience network (SN), but it remains unclear whether differences in connectivity in the DMN, CEN, and SN are associated with familial risk for mood disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited youth aged 9-19 years, including offspring of parents with major depressive or bipolar disorders (familial high risk [FHR]) and offspring of parents with no mood disorder (controls) for a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. We tested associations between family history of major mood disorders and connectivity within and between the DMN, CEN, and SN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 215 youth: 126 at FHR with a mean age of 13.38 (standard deviation [SD] 2.91) years and 79 controls with a mean age of 13.17 (SD 2.67) years. Mean connectivity in the DMN (β = 0.003, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.023 to 0.029), CEN (β = -0.009, 95% CI, -0.070 to 0.089), and SN (β = -0.010, 95% CI -0.071 to 0.051) in the FHR group was similar to that of controls. Moreover, DMN, CEN, and SN connectivity was not significantly associated with depressive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Given that brain connectivity changes over the developmental period, longitudinal studies would improve understanding of how this change occurs in familial risk groups to identify critical time periods for intervention or prevention of mood disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Connectivity within and between the DMN, CEN, and SN is not a neural indicator of familial risk for major mood disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"50 3\",\"pages\":\"E181-E193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133295/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.250002\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.250002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:情绪障碍,包括抑郁症和双相情感障碍,开始于青春期晚期到成年早期,倾向于家族遗传,早期表现为阈下症状。它们与3个核心网络的不同连通性有关:默认模式网络(DMN)、认知执行网络(CEN)和显著性网络(SN),但DMN、CEN和SN的连通性差异是否与情绪障碍的家族性风险有关尚不清楚。方法:我们招募了9-19岁的年轻人,包括父母患有重度抑郁症或双相情感障碍(家族性高风险[FHR])的后代和父母没有情绪障碍(对照组)的后代,进行静息状态功能磁共振成像研究。我们测试了主要情绪障碍家族史与DMN、CEN和SN内部和之间的连通性之间的关联。结果:我们纳入了215名青年:FHR组126名,平均年龄13.38岁(标准差[SD] 2.91),对照组79名,平均年龄13.17岁(SD 2.67)。FHR组DMN (β = 0.003, 95%可信区间[CI] -0.023至0.029)、CEN (β = -0.009, 95% CI, -0.070至0.089)和SN (β = -0.010, 95% CI -0.071至0.051)的平均连通性与对照组相似。此外,DMN、CEN和SN连通性与抑郁症状无显著相关。局限性:考虑到大脑连接在发育过程中发生变化,纵向研究将提高对这种变化如何在家族风险群体中发生的理解,以确定干预或预防情绪障碍的关键时期。结论:DMN、CEN和SN内部和之间的连通性不是重大情绪障碍家族性风险的神经指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Familial risk of major mood disorders and brain functional connectivity in the default mode, cognitive executive, and salience networks.

Background: Mood disorders, including depressive and bipolar disorders, begin in late adolescence to early adulthood, tend to run in families, and present early with subthreshold symptoms. They have been associated with differential connectivity in 3 core networks: the default mode network (DMN), cognitive executive network (CEN), and salience network (SN), but it remains unclear whether differences in connectivity in the DMN, CEN, and SN are associated with familial risk for mood disorders.

Methods: We recruited youth aged 9-19 years, including offspring of parents with major depressive or bipolar disorders (familial high risk [FHR]) and offspring of parents with no mood disorder (controls) for a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. We tested associations between family history of major mood disorders and connectivity within and between the DMN, CEN, and SN.

Results: We included 215 youth: 126 at FHR with a mean age of 13.38 (standard deviation [SD] 2.91) years and 79 controls with a mean age of 13.17 (SD 2.67) years. Mean connectivity in the DMN (β = 0.003, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.023 to 0.029), CEN (β = -0.009, 95% CI, -0.070 to 0.089), and SN (β = -0.010, 95% CI -0.071 to 0.051) in the FHR group was similar to that of controls. Moreover, DMN, CEN, and SN connectivity was not significantly associated with depressive symptoms.

Limitations: Given that brain connectivity changes over the developmental period, longitudinal studies would improve understanding of how this change occurs in familial risk groups to identify critical time periods for intervention or prevention of mood disorders.

Conclusion: Connectivity within and between the DMN, CEN, and SN is not a neural indicator of familial risk for major mood disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience publishes papers at the intersection of psychiatry and neuroscience that advance our understanding of the neural mechanisms involved in the etiology and treatment of psychiatric disorders. This includes studies on patients with psychiatric disorders, healthy humans, and experimental animals as well as studies in vitro. Original research articles, including clinical trials with a mechanistic component, and review papers will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信