{"title":"胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂对2型糖尿病患者胃肠道的益处:一项真实世界的研究","authors":"Jung-Hui Hsu, Hsueh-Fen Bai, Mon-Ting Chen, Yu-Wei Fang, Jing-Tong Wang, Chieh-Yu Liu, Ming-Hsein Tsai","doi":"10.12659/MSM.946935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1-RA) is a promising therapy for heart and kidney health in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, information on its GI benefits is limited. This study aimed to investigate the gastrointestinal (GI) outcomes of GLP1-RA use in patients with T2DM. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study utilized the TriNetX Dataset with a new-user and active-comparator design. The study included 2 304 761 adult patients diagnosed with T2DM and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m² from January 2019 to December 2022. To establish cohorts, we designated users of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) as the control group. Two cohorts were formed for analysis after propensity score matching by baseline characteristics, each comprising 127 216 patients - one using GLP1-RA and the other DPP4i. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate GI outcomes over 4 years between groups. RESULTS After matching, the average age of the population was about 60 years, with approximately 55% male and 63% identifying as White people. GLP1-RA users demonstrated a lower risk of acute pancreatitis (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.97), liver failure (HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.75-0.88), peritonitis (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.76-0.94), peptic ulcer (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.94), and GI bleeding (HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.98) compared to DPP4i users, indicating significant GI-protective effects. Furthermore, the GI advantages of GLP14A over DPP4i were consistently observed across various propensity score matching models. CONCLUSIONS GLP1-RA treatment in T2DM has some GI advantages compared to DPP4, which should be considered when personalizing T2DM treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"31 ","pages":"e946935"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Lead to Gastrointestinal Benefits in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Real-World Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jung-Hui Hsu, Hsueh-Fen Bai, Mon-Ting Chen, Yu-Wei Fang, Jing-Tong Wang, Chieh-Yu Liu, Ming-Hsein Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/MSM.946935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BACKGROUND Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1-RA) is a promising therapy for heart and kidney health in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, information on its GI benefits is limited. This study aimed to investigate the gastrointestinal (GI) outcomes of GLP1-RA use in patients with T2DM. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study utilized the TriNetX Dataset with a new-user and active-comparator design. The study included 2 304 761 adult patients diagnosed with T2DM and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m² from January 2019 to December 2022. To establish cohorts, we designated users of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) as the control group. Two cohorts were formed for analysis after propensity score matching by baseline characteristics, each comprising 127 216 patients - one using GLP1-RA and the other DPP4i. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate GI outcomes over 4 years between groups. RESULTS After matching, the average age of the population was about 60 years, with approximately 55% male and 63% identifying as White people. GLP1-RA users demonstrated a lower risk of acute pancreatitis (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.97), liver failure (HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.75-0.88), peritonitis (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.76-0.94), peptic ulcer (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.94), and GI bleeding (HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.98) compared to DPP4i users, indicating significant GI-protective effects. Furthermore, the GI advantages of GLP14A over DPP4i were consistently observed across various propensity score matching models. CONCLUSIONS GLP1-RA treatment in T2DM has some GI advantages compared to DPP4, which should be considered when personalizing T2DM treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"volume\":\"31 \",\"pages\":\"e946935\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125961/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.946935\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.946935","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Lead to Gastrointestinal Benefits in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Real-World Study.
BACKGROUND Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1-RA) is a promising therapy for heart and kidney health in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, information on its GI benefits is limited. This study aimed to investigate the gastrointestinal (GI) outcomes of GLP1-RA use in patients with T2DM. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study utilized the TriNetX Dataset with a new-user and active-comparator design. The study included 2 304 761 adult patients diagnosed with T2DM and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m² from January 2019 to December 2022. To establish cohorts, we designated users of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) as the control group. Two cohorts were formed for analysis after propensity score matching by baseline characteristics, each comprising 127 216 patients - one using GLP1-RA and the other DPP4i. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate GI outcomes over 4 years between groups. RESULTS After matching, the average age of the population was about 60 years, with approximately 55% male and 63% identifying as White people. GLP1-RA users demonstrated a lower risk of acute pancreatitis (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.97), liver failure (HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.75-0.88), peritonitis (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.76-0.94), peptic ulcer (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.94), and GI bleeding (HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.98) compared to DPP4i users, indicating significant GI-protective effects. Furthermore, the GI advantages of GLP14A over DPP4i were consistently observed across various propensity score matching models. CONCLUSIONS GLP1-RA treatment in T2DM has some GI advantages compared to DPP4, which should be considered when personalizing T2DM treatment.
期刊介绍:
Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper.
Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.