欧洲初级保健中的单吸入器三联疗法:关于付款人驱动的获取规则和行动呼吁的后果的专家小组共识。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Fabiano Di Marco, Orjola Shahaj, Arschang Valipour, Bertrand Legrand, Claudio Jommi, Claudio Micheletto, Claus Franz Vogelmeier, Daryl Freeman, Janwillem W H Kocks, Luis Alves, Myriam Calle Rubio, Rudi Peché, Susanna Palkonen Snr, Tonya Winders, Nicolas Roche
{"title":"欧洲初级保健中的单吸入器三联疗法:关于付款人驱动的获取规则和行动呼吁的后果的专家小组共识。","authors":"Fabiano Di Marco, Orjola Shahaj, Arschang Valipour, Bertrand Legrand, Claudio Jommi, Claudio Micheletto, Claus Franz Vogelmeier, Daryl Freeman, Janwillem W H Kocks, Luis Alves, Myriam Calle Rubio, Rudi Peché, Susanna Palkonen Snr, Tonya Winders, Nicolas Roche","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S503726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a prevalent condition characterized by persistent airflow obstruction and respiratory symptoms. Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy (SITT) has been shown to improve patient adherence, reduce exacerbations, and lower healthcare resource utilization in patients who are not controlled despite being on dual therapy or Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy (MITT). Despite evidence supporting SITT, payer-driven access rules across Europe sometimes limit its use in primary care, creating barriers to optimal COPD management.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Through expert consensus, the study seeks to generate a shared understanding of the unintended consequences of payer-driven access criteria for SITT in managing moderate-to-severe COPD in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A targeted literature review (TLR) was conducted to assess SITT initiation in primary care across Europe and examine the impact of access criteria. Semi-structured interviews were held with 14 experts from nine European countries, including clinicians, health economists, and patient advocacy representatives. A consensus generation workshop was conducted, where experts evaluated the findings and developed position statements to highlight the challenges posed by payer-driven access criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TLR identified variability in access to SITT in Europe, with several countries restricting its initiation to specialists, thus limiting primary care physicians' (PCPs) ability to prescribe SITT. The expert panel generated seven consensus points stating that enabling PCPs to step up or switch eligible patients to SITT has the potential to support care continuity, enhance clinical autonomy for PCPs, reduce reliance on potentially less effective treatment options, improve patient and healthcare system outcomes, avoid unnecessary referrals to specialists, enable prompt initiation of guideline-directed medical therapy for COPD in primary care and reduce access inequalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Restrictions for SITT initiation in primary care may need to be revisited to mitigate their unintended health and cost consequences and improve equitable access to treatment. This should take into consideration each country's unique healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"1595-1612"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107283/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy in Primary Care Across Europe: Expert Panel Consensus on the Consequences of Payer-Driven Access Rules and Call to Action.\",\"authors\":\"Fabiano Di Marco, Orjola Shahaj, Arschang Valipour, Bertrand Legrand, Claudio Jommi, Claudio Micheletto, Claus Franz Vogelmeier, Daryl Freeman, Janwillem W H Kocks, Luis Alves, Myriam Calle Rubio, Rudi Peché, Susanna Palkonen Snr, Tonya Winders, Nicolas Roche\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/COPD.S503726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a prevalent condition characterized by persistent airflow obstruction and respiratory symptoms. Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy (SITT) has been shown to improve patient adherence, reduce exacerbations, and lower healthcare resource utilization in patients who are not controlled despite being on dual therapy or Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy (MITT). Despite evidence supporting SITT, payer-driven access rules across Europe sometimes limit its use in primary care, creating barriers to optimal COPD management.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Through expert consensus, the study seeks to generate a shared understanding of the unintended consequences of payer-driven access criteria for SITT in managing moderate-to-severe COPD in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A targeted literature review (TLR) was conducted to assess SITT initiation in primary care across Europe and examine the impact of access criteria. Semi-structured interviews were held with 14 experts from nine European countries, including clinicians, health economists, and patient advocacy representatives. A consensus generation workshop was conducted, where experts evaluated the findings and developed position statements to highlight the challenges posed by payer-driven access criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TLR identified variability in access to SITT in Europe, with several countries restricting its initiation to specialists, thus limiting primary care physicians' (PCPs) ability to prescribe SITT. The expert panel generated seven consensus points stating that enabling PCPs to step up or switch eligible patients to SITT has the potential to support care continuity, enhance clinical autonomy for PCPs, reduce reliance on potentially less effective treatment options, improve patient and healthcare system outcomes, avoid unnecessary referrals to specialists, enable prompt initiation of guideline-directed medical therapy for COPD in primary care and reduce access inequalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Restrictions for SITT initiation in primary care may need to be revisited to mitigate their unintended health and cost consequences and improve equitable access to treatment. This should take into consideration each country's unique healthcare system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"1595-1612\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107283/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S503726\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S503726","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一种以持续气流阻塞和呼吸系统症状为特征的常见病。单吸入器三联疗法(SITT)已被证明可以改善患者的依从性,减少病情恶化,并降低尽管接受双重治疗或多吸入器三联疗法(MITT)仍未得到控制的患者的医疗保健资源利用率。尽管有证据支持SITT,但欧洲各地的付款人驱动的获取规则有时会限制其在初级保健中的使用,从而为最佳COPD管理创造障碍。目的:通过专家共识,该研究旨在对SITT在初级保健中管理中重度COPD的付款人驱动的获取标准的意外后果产生共同的理解。方法:进行了一项针对性的文献综述(TLR),以评估整个欧洲初级保健的SITT启动,并检查获取标准的影响。与来自9个欧洲国家的14名专家进行了半结构化访谈,其中包括临床医生、卫生经济学家和患者倡导代表。举办了一个达成共识的研讨会,专家们在会上评估了调查结果,并制定了立场声明,以强调由付款人驱动的获取标准带来的挑战。结果:TLR确定了SITT在欧洲的可变性,一些国家将其限制在专科医生开始,从而限制了初级保健医生(pcp)开SITT的能力。专家小组达成了7项共识,指出使pcp加强或将符合条件的患者转换为SITT有可能支持护理连续性,增强pcp的临床自主权,减少对可能不太有效的治疗方案的依赖,改善患者和医疗保健系统的结果,避免不必要的转诊给专家,能够在初级保健中迅速启动针对COPD的指导医学治疗,并减少获取不平等。结论:可能需要重新考虑在初级保健中启动SITT的限制,以减轻其意外的健康和成本后果,并改善公平获得治疗的机会。这应该考虑到每个国家独特的医疗体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy in Primary Care Across Europe: Expert Panel Consensus on the Consequences of Payer-Driven Access Rules and Call to Action.

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a prevalent condition characterized by persistent airflow obstruction and respiratory symptoms. Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy (SITT) has been shown to improve patient adherence, reduce exacerbations, and lower healthcare resource utilization in patients who are not controlled despite being on dual therapy or Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy (MITT). Despite evidence supporting SITT, payer-driven access rules across Europe sometimes limit its use in primary care, creating barriers to optimal COPD management.

Purpose: Through expert consensus, the study seeks to generate a shared understanding of the unintended consequences of payer-driven access criteria for SITT in managing moderate-to-severe COPD in primary care.

Methods: A targeted literature review (TLR) was conducted to assess SITT initiation in primary care across Europe and examine the impact of access criteria. Semi-structured interviews were held with 14 experts from nine European countries, including clinicians, health economists, and patient advocacy representatives. A consensus generation workshop was conducted, where experts evaluated the findings and developed position statements to highlight the challenges posed by payer-driven access criteria.

Results: The TLR identified variability in access to SITT in Europe, with several countries restricting its initiation to specialists, thus limiting primary care physicians' (PCPs) ability to prescribe SITT. The expert panel generated seven consensus points stating that enabling PCPs to step up or switch eligible patients to SITT has the potential to support care continuity, enhance clinical autonomy for PCPs, reduce reliance on potentially less effective treatment options, improve patient and healthcare system outcomes, avoid unnecessary referrals to specialists, enable prompt initiation of guideline-directed medical therapy for COPD in primary care and reduce access inequalities.

Conclusion: Restrictions for SITT initiation in primary care may need to be revisited to mitigate their unintended health and cost consequences and improve equitable access to treatment. This should take into consideration each country's unique healthcare system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信