Ashley E Thompson, Lizzy Bensen, Ryn Theis, Nomi Ostrander
{"title":"性别和性行为类型对假设男女性行为判断的影响：混合性别三人行和二元性行为的比较。","authors":"Ashley E Thompson, Lizzy Bensen, Ryn Theis, Nomi Ostrander","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2025.2512114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the plethora of research exploring snap judgments of sexual orientation, no study has explored how knowledge of a target's previous sexual experience impacts judgments of sexual attraction, particularly participation in mixed-sex threesomes (MSTs). Thus, this study assessed the impact of participant sex and previous sexual experience (dyadic vs MST) on snap judgments of hypothetical men's and women's sexual attraction. A total of 826 adults were randomly assigned to read a vignette depicting either a hypothetical man or woman initiating an MST with two men, a MST with two women, dyadic sex with two men, dyadic sex with two women, or mixed dyadic sex. Participants then completed a scale assessing sexual attraction judgments. Results indicated that hypothetical individuals initiating same-sex sexual behavior were judged as more same sex attracted than those initiating other-sex sexual behavior. However, for hypothetical men, this effect was impacted by the type of behavior, such that men initiating same-sex dyadic sex were judged as being more same-sex attracted than men initiating same-sex MST sex. These findings confirm that people make snap judgments about a person's sexuality from limited information and that MSTs may serve as an avenue to explore same-sex sexual behavior in a reduced-stigma context.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Sex and Type of Sexual Behavior on Judgments of Hypothetical Men's and Women's Sexuality: A Comparison Between Mixed-Sex Threesomes and Dyadic Sexual Behaviors.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley E Thompson, Lizzy Bensen, Ryn Theis, Nomi Ostrander\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00918369.2025.2512114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite the plethora of research exploring snap judgments of sexual orientation, no study has explored how knowledge of a target's previous sexual experience impacts judgments of sexual attraction, particularly participation in mixed-sex threesomes (MSTs). Thus, this study assessed the impact of participant sex and previous sexual experience (dyadic vs MST) on snap judgments of hypothetical men's and women's sexual attraction. A total of 826 adults were randomly assigned to read a vignette depicting either a hypothetical man or woman initiating an MST with two men, a MST with two women, dyadic sex with two men, dyadic sex with two women, or mixed dyadic sex. Participants then completed a scale assessing sexual attraction judgments. Results indicated that hypothetical individuals initiating same-sex sexual behavior were judged as more same sex attracted than those initiating other-sex sexual behavior. However, for hypothetical men, this effect was impacted by the type of behavior, such that men initiating same-sex dyadic sex were judged as being more same-sex attracted than men initiating same-sex MST sex. These findings confirm that people make snap judgments about a person's sexuality from limited information and that MSTs may serve as an avenue to explore same-sex sexual behavior in a reduced-stigma context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2512114\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2512114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Impact of Sex and Type of Sexual Behavior on Judgments of Hypothetical Men's and Women's Sexuality: A Comparison Between Mixed-Sex Threesomes and Dyadic Sexual Behaviors.
Despite the plethora of research exploring snap judgments of sexual orientation, no study has explored how knowledge of a target's previous sexual experience impacts judgments of sexual attraction, particularly participation in mixed-sex threesomes (MSTs). Thus, this study assessed the impact of participant sex and previous sexual experience (dyadic vs MST) on snap judgments of hypothetical men's and women's sexual attraction. A total of 826 adults were randomly assigned to read a vignette depicting either a hypothetical man or woman initiating an MST with two men, a MST with two women, dyadic sex with two men, dyadic sex with two women, or mixed dyadic sex. Participants then completed a scale assessing sexual attraction judgments. Results indicated that hypothetical individuals initiating same-sex sexual behavior were judged as more same sex attracted than those initiating other-sex sexual behavior. However, for hypothetical men, this effect was impacted by the type of behavior, such that men initiating same-sex dyadic sex were judged as being more same-sex attracted than men initiating same-sex MST sex. These findings confirm that people make snap judgments about a person's sexuality from limited information and that MSTs may serve as an avenue to explore same-sex sexual behavior in a reduced-stigma context.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
