在对合并PTSD的神经性厌食症患者的强制护理中,呼吁采用创伤知情的方法——一个自我民族学的观点。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Jennie Moberg
{"title":"在对合并PTSD的神经性厌食症患者的强制护理中,呼吁采用创伤知情的方法——一个自我民族学的观点。","authors":"Jennie Moberg","doi":"10.1186/s40337-025-01283-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with both anorexia nervosa (AN) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) often experience significant challenges in psychiatric inpatient care, particularly when coercive measures are used. While the comorbidity of AN and PTSD is well-documented, their interplay in the context of compulsory care and from a lived experience and trauma-informed perspective remains underexplored, despite its critical impact on treatment outcomes. This autoethnographic study aims to shed light on how coercion is experienced in this context, highlighting the need for a trauma-informed approach that acknowledges patients' histories rather than solely viewing their behaviors as pathological. The Power Threat Meaning Framework (PTMF) provides a theoretical lens for understanding how trauma affects individuals with AN and PTSD, emphasizing the importance of viewing these conditions not just as symptoms to be treated but as survival strategies linked to broader trauma histories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An autoethnographic approach was used to analyze blog posts, clinical notes, and diary entries from 2010 to 2019, focusing on experiences of AN, coercion, and trauma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One overarching theme, 'Life in inpatient care', and four subthemes emerged: (1) 'Being sucked into the vortex of hunger', (2) 'Relapse no. 5 and admission procedure - state of emergency', (3) 'Encountering coercion and losing control - living in constant fear', and (4) 'Managing the aftermaths of eating'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This autoethnography highlights the interplay between AN and PTSD in compulsory inpatient care, showing how AN served as a coping mechanism for trauma, with starvation as emotional avoidance. The PTMF framework challenges diagnostic-based models, viewing these behaviors as survival strategies rather than pathology. Key findings highlight the impact of coercive treatments such as forced feeding and restraint, which can intensify fear and retraumatization. A trauma-informed approach prioritizing trust, autonomy, and trauma acknowledgment is essential for effective, compassionate care. Recovery should go beyond renourishment to include psychological healing and body-self reintegration, emphasizing a holistic, patient-centered approach for improved treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"13 1","pages":"92"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A call for a trauma-informed approach during compulsory care for enduring anorexia nervosa with combined PTSD - an autoethnographic perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Jennie Moberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40337-025-01283-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with both anorexia nervosa (AN) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) often experience significant challenges in psychiatric inpatient care, particularly when coercive measures are used. While the comorbidity of AN and PTSD is well-documented, their interplay in the context of compulsory care and from a lived experience and trauma-informed perspective remains underexplored, despite its critical impact on treatment outcomes. This autoethnographic study aims to shed light on how coercion is experienced in this context, highlighting the need for a trauma-informed approach that acknowledges patients' histories rather than solely viewing their behaviors as pathological. The Power Threat Meaning Framework (PTMF) provides a theoretical lens for understanding how trauma affects individuals with AN and PTSD, emphasizing the importance of viewing these conditions not just as symptoms to be treated but as survival strategies linked to broader trauma histories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An autoethnographic approach was used to analyze blog posts, clinical notes, and diary entries from 2010 to 2019, focusing on experiences of AN, coercion, and trauma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One overarching theme, 'Life in inpatient care', and four subthemes emerged: (1) 'Being sucked into the vortex of hunger', (2) 'Relapse no. 5 and admission procedure - state of emergency', (3) 'Encountering coercion and losing control - living in constant fear', and (4) 'Managing the aftermaths of eating'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This autoethnography highlights the interplay between AN and PTSD in compulsory inpatient care, showing how AN served as a coping mechanism for trauma, with starvation as emotional avoidance. The PTMF framework challenges diagnostic-based models, viewing these behaviors as survival strategies rather than pathology. Key findings highlight the impact of coercive treatments such as forced feeding and restraint, which can intensify fear and retraumatization. A trauma-informed approach prioritizing trust, autonomy, and trauma acknowledgment is essential for effective, compassionate care. Recovery should go beyond renourishment to include psychological healing and body-self reintegration, emphasizing a holistic, patient-centered approach for improved treatment outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107862/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-025-01283-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-025-01283-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患有神经性厌食症(AN)和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的个体在精神科住院治疗中经常遇到重大挑战,特别是当使用强制措施时。虽然AN和PTSD的合并症有充分的文献记载,但它们在强制医疗背景下的相互作用,从生活经验和创伤信息的角度来看,尽管它对治疗结果有重要影响,但仍未得到充分的探讨。这项自我民族志研究旨在阐明在这种情况下胁迫是如何经历的,强调需要一种创伤知情的方法,承认患者的历史,而不是仅仅将他们的行为视为病态。权力威胁意义框架(PTMF)为理解创伤如何影响AN和PTSD患者提供了一个理论视角,强调了将这些条件不仅仅视为需要治疗的症状,而且视为与更广泛的创伤史相关的生存策略的重要性。方法:采用自我民族志方法分析2010年至2019年的博客文章、临床笔记和日记,重点分析An、胁迫和创伤的经历。结果:出现了一个总体主题“住院护理中的生活”和四个子主题:(1)“被卷入饥饿的漩涡”,(2)“没有复发。5和入院程序-紧急状态',(3)“遭遇胁迫和失去控制——生活在持续的恐惧中”,以及(4)“处理进食的后果”。结论:本自我民族志强调了强制住院治疗中AN与PTSD之间的相互作用,显示了AN是如何作为创伤的应对机制,而饥饿是一种情绪回避。PTMF框架挑战了基于诊断的模型,将这些行为视为生存策略而非病理。主要调查结果强调了强制治疗的影响,如强迫喂食和约束,这可能加剧恐惧和再创伤。创伤知情的方法优先考虑信任,自主和创伤承认是有效的,富有同情心的护理必不可少的。康复应超越恢复,包括心理治疗和身体-自我融合,强调整体的,以病人为中心的方法来改善治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A call for a trauma-informed approach during compulsory care for enduring anorexia nervosa with combined PTSD - an autoethnographic perspective.

Background: Individuals with both anorexia nervosa (AN) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) often experience significant challenges in psychiatric inpatient care, particularly when coercive measures are used. While the comorbidity of AN and PTSD is well-documented, their interplay in the context of compulsory care and from a lived experience and trauma-informed perspective remains underexplored, despite its critical impact on treatment outcomes. This autoethnographic study aims to shed light on how coercion is experienced in this context, highlighting the need for a trauma-informed approach that acknowledges patients' histories rather than solely viewing their behaviors as pathological. The Power Threat Meaning Framework (PTMF) provides a theoretical lens for understanding how trauma affects individuals with AN and PTSD, emphasizing the importance of viewing these conditions not just as symptoms to be treated but as survival strategies linked to broader trauma histories.

Methods: An autoethnographic approach was used to analyze blog posts, clinical notes, and diary entries from 2010 to 2019, focusing on experiences of AN, coercion, and trauma.

Results: One overarching theme, 'Life in inpatient care', and four subthemes emerged: (1) 'Being sucked into the vortex of hunger', (2) 'Relapse no. 5 and admission procedure - state of emergency', (3) 'Encountering coercion and losing control - living in constant fear', and (4) 'Managing the aftermaths of eating'.

Conclusions: This autoethnography highlights the interplay between AN and PTSD in compulsory inpatient care, showing how AN served as a coping mechanism for trauma, with starvation as emotional avoidance. The PTMF framework challenges diagnostic-based models, viewing these behaviors as survival strategies rather than pathology. Key findings highlight the impact of coercive treatments such as forced feeding and restraint, which can intensify fear and retraumatization. A trauma-informed approach prioritizing trust, autonomy, and trauma acknowledgment is essential for effective, compassionate care. Recovery should go beyond renourishment to include psychological healing and body-self reintegration, emphasizing a holistic, patient-centered approach for improved treatment outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Eating Disorders
Journal of Eating Disorders Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
17.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Eating Disorders is the first open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing leading research in the science and clinical practice of eating disorders. It disseminates research that provides answers to the important issues and key challenges in the field of eating disorders and to facilitate translation of evidence into practice. The journal publishes research on all aspects of eating disorders namely their epidemiology, nature, determinants, neurobiology, prevention, treatment and outcomes. The scope includes, but is not limited to anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder and other eating disorders. Related areas such as important co-morbidities, obesity, body image, appetite, food and eating are also included. Articles about research methodology and assessment are welcomed where they advance the field of eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信