“今天最重要,今天一切都很好”:一项定性研究表明,接受癌症治疗的孩子的父母在寻求心理支持时使用的应对策略。

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Johan Lundgren, Christina Reuther, Paul Farrand, Nina Lutvica, Ella Thiblin, Louise von Essen, Joanne Woodford
{"title":"“今天最重要,今天一切都很好”:一项定性研究表明,接受癌症治疗的孩子的父母在寻求心理支持时使用的应对策略。","authors":"Johan Lundgren, Christina Reuther, Paul Farrand, Nina Lutvica, Ella Thiblin, Louise von Essen, Joanne Woodford","doi":"10.1186/s40359-025-02860-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Childhood cancer treatment completion is a period of vulnerability for parents and is associated with depression, anxiety, restrictions on daily life, and negative socioeconomic consequences. Understanding what helpful and unhelpful coping strategies parents utilize to manage cancer-related distress and concerns may inform the development of tailored psychological support. However, coping strategies used by parents who seek psychological support related to their child's cancer are not well described. To address this gap, we conducted an embedded semi-structured interview study with parents enrolled into the feasibility study ENGAGE. The overall aim of ENGAGE was to examine the acceptability and feasibility of an internet-administered, guided, low intensity cognitive behavioral therapy based self-help intervention, EJDeR. Study aims were to: (1) describe coping strategies used by parents who seek psychological support after end of treatment to cope with cancer-related distress and concerns and (2) consider these coping strategies to inform ongoing adaptations to the EJDeR intervention, taking potential gender differences in coping and subsequent support needs into consideration.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Seventy-three semi-structured interviews were conducted. Data was coded using inductive manifest content analysis and subsequently triangulated with a secondary theory-driven data analysis guided by the control-based model of coping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parents used three primary control coping strategies: utilizing tools and techniques, striving for a healthy and balanced lifestyle, and seeking support. Parents used three secondary control coping strategies: accepting and refocusing, adapting to the situation with help from others, and distracting temporarily. Parents used one disengagement-focused coping strategy: avoiding and distancing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Parents adopted both primary and secondary control coping strategies as well as disengagement-focused coping strategies in accordance with the control-based model of coping. Findings supported the choice of low intensity cognitive behavioral therapy techniques used in the EJDeR intervention to target behavioral and experiential avoidance (i.e., disengagement-focused coping). A need to emphasize the importance of seeking social support in future EJDeR adaptations was identified. Understanding coping strategies used by parents of children off treatment who seek psychological support may inform the development of other psychological interventions for the population.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN57233429 ( https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN57233429 ; registration date 19/04/2018).</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"565"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12108027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"It is today that counts, and today everything is fine\\\": coping strategies utilized by parents of children treated for cancer who seek psychological support - a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Johan Lundgren, Christina Reuther, Paul Farrand, Nina Lutvica, Ella Thiblin, Louise von Essen, Joanne Woodford\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40359-025-02860-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Childhood cancer treatment completion is a period of vulnerability for parents and is associated with depression, anxiety, restrictions on daily life, and negative socioeconomic consequences. Understanding what helpful and unhelpful coping strategies parents utilize to manage cancer-related distress and concerns may inform the development of tailored psychological support. However, coping strategies used by parents who seek psychological support related to their child's cancer are not well described. To address this gap, we conducted an embedded semi-structured interview study with parents enrolled into the feasibility study ENGAGE. The overall aim of ENGAGE was to examine the acceptability and feasibility of an internet-administered, guided, low intensity cognitive behavioral therapy based self-help intervention, EJDeR. Study aims were to: (1) describe coping strategies used by parents who seek psychological support after end of treatment to cope with cancer-related distress and concerns and (2) consider these coping strategies to inform ongoing adaptations to the EJDeR intervention, taking potential gender differences in coping and subsequent support needs into consideration.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Seventy-three semi-structured interviews were conducted. Data was coded using inductive manifest content analysis and subsequently triangulated with a secondary theory-driven data analysis guided by the control-based model of coping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parents used three primary control coping strategies: utilizing tools and techniques, striving for a healthy and balanced lifestyle, and seeking support. Parents used three secondary control coping strategies: accepting and refocusing, adapting to the situation with help from others, and distracting temporarily. Parents used one disengagement-focused coping strategy: avoiding and distancing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Parents adopted both primary and secondary control coping strategies as well as disengagement-focused coping strategies in accordance with the control-based model of coping. Findings supported the choice of low intensity cognitive behavioral therapy techniques used in the EJDeR intervention to target behavioral and experiential avoidance (i.e., disengagement-focused coping). A need to emphasize the importance of seeking social support in future EJDeR adaptations was identified. Understanding coping strategies used by parents of children off treatment who seek psychological support may inform the development of other psychological interventions for the population.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN57233429 ( https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN57233429 ; registration date 19/04/2018).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Psychology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"565\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12108027/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02860-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02860-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:儿童癌症治疗结束对父母来说是一个脆弱的时期,与抑郁、焦虑、日常生活限制和负面的社会经济后果有关。了解父母在处理与癌症相关的痛苦和担忧时使用的有用和无用的应对策略,可以为量身定制的心理支持的发展提供信息。然而,父母在寻求与孩子癌症相关的心理支持时所使用的应对策略并没有得到很好的描述。为了解决这一差距,我们对参与可行性研究ENGAGE的父母进行了嵌入式半结构化访谈研究。ENGAGE的总体目的是检验互联网管理、引导、基于自助干预的低强度认知行为疗法(EJDeR)的可接受性和可行性。研究的目的是:(1)描述在治疗结束后寻求心理支持的父母使用的应对策略,以应对与癌症相关的痛苦和担忧;(2)考虑到应对和后续支持需求的潜在性别差异,考虑这些应对策略,以指导对EJDeR干预的持续适应。方法:采用半结构式访谈73例。数据采用归纳式清单内容分析进行编码,随后采用基于控制的应对模型指导的二级理论驱动数据分析进行三角测量。结果:家长使用了三种主要的控制应对策略:利用工具和技术、努力追求健康平衡的生活方式和寻求支持。家长使用了三种次要控制应对策略:接受并重新聚焦、在他人的帮助下适应情况、暂时分散注意力。父母使用了一种以脱离为中心的应对策略:回避和疏远。结论:家长采取了一级和二级控制性应对策略以及以脱离投入为中心的应对策略,符合控制为基础的应对模式。研究结果支持在EJDeR干预中使用低强度认知行为治疗技术来针对行为和经验回避(即以脱离为中心的应对)。需要强调在未来的EJDeR适应中寻求社会支持的重要性。了解寻求心理支持的未接受治疗儿童的父母使用的应对策略,可以为人群中其他心理干预措施的发展提供信息。试验注册:ISRCTN57233429 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN57233429;注册日期19/04/2018)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"It is today that counts, and today everything is fine": coping strategies utilized by parents of children treated for cancer who seek psychological support - a qualitative study.

Background: Childhood cancer treatment completion is a period of vulnerability for parents and is associated with depression, anxiety, restrictions on daily life, and negative socioeconomic consequences. Understanding what helpful and unhelpful coping strategies parents utilize to manage cancer-related distress and concerns may inform the development of tailored psychological support. However, coping strategies used by parents who seek psychological support related to their child's cancer are not well described. To address this gap, we conducted an embedded semi-structured interview study with parents enrolled into the feasibility study ENGAGE. The overall aim of ENGAGE was to examine the acceptability and feasibility of an internet-administered, guided, low intensity cognitive behavioral therapy based self-help intervention, EJDeR. Study aims were to: (1) describe coping strategies used by parents who seek psychological support after end of treatment to cope with cancer-related distress and concerns and (2) consider these coping strategies to inform ongoing adaptations to the EJDeR intervention, taking potential gender differences in coping and subsequent support needs into consideration.

Method: Seventy-three semi-structured interviews were conducted. Data was coded using inductive manifest content analysis and subsequently triangulated with a secondary theory-driven data analysis guided by the control-based model of coping.

Results: Parents used three primary control coping strategies: utilizing tools and techniques, striving for a healthy and balanced lifestyle, and seeking support. Parents used three secondary control coping strategies: accepting and refocusing, adapting to the situation with help from others, and distracting temporarily. Parents used one disengagement-focused coping strategy: avoiding and distancing.

Conclusions: Parents adopted both primary and secondary control coping strategies as well as disengagement-focused coping strategies in accordance with the control-based model of coping. Findings supported the choice of low intensity cognitive behavioral therapy techniques used in the EJDeR intervention to target behavioral and experiential avoidance (i.e., disengagement-focused coping). A need to emphasize the importance of seeking social support in future EJDeR adaptations was identified. Understanding coping strategies used by parents of children off treatment who seek psychological support may inform the development of other psychological interventions for the population.

Trial registration: ISRCTN57233429 ( https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN57233429 ; registration date 19/04/2018).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信