口腔医学中的远程医疗:公共卫生系统专业人员对应用程序可用性和满意度的评估。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Maria do Desterro Andrêzza Souza Costa, Quemuel Pereira da Silva, Hélder Domiciano Dantas Martins, Paulo Rogério Ferreti Bonan, Edson Hilan Gomes de Lucena
{"title":"口腔医学中的远程医疗:公共卫生系统专业人员对应用程序可用性和满意度的评估。","authors":"Maria do Desterro Andrêzza Souza Costa, Quemuel Pereira da Silva, Hélder Domiciano Dantas Martins, Paulo Rogério Ferreti Bonan, Edson Hilan Gomes de Lucena","doi":"10.1177/09287329251341085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveEvaluate the usability and user satisfaction of an oral medicine application among public health professionals.MethodsA cross-sectional observational study was conducted with 101 dentists registered in the application, determined through sample size calculation. Data were collected using an online questionnaire. The System Usability Scale (SyUS) was used to assess usability, and an adapted questionnaire evaluated user satisfaction. Variables influencing satisfaction and usability were also analyzed.ResultsMost participants were female (73.3%), aged between 20 and 59 years (98%), with up to 10 years of professional experience (73%). The majority had a specialization (81%), including 24.8% in Collective and Family Health, and 80.2% worked in Primary Health Care. The mean SyUS usability score was 91.25 (scale: 0-100), exceeding the threshold of 70 for a viable product. Participants expressed high satisfaction with the app's theoretical and clinical support. Suggested improvements included a lesion database, chat functionality, interactive notifications, expanded attachment capacity, training initiatives, and broader specialty coverage.ConclusionThe application achieved high usability and satisfaction scores, proving essential, intuitive, and effective. It complements public health systems by supporting diagnosis and treatment, enhancing professional collaboration, and improving care quality while addressing continuity and problem-solving needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"9287329251341085"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telehealth in oral medicine: Evaluation of app usability and satisfaction among public health system professionals.\",\"authors\":\"Maria do Desterro Andrêzza Souza Costa, Quemuel Pereira da Silva, Hélder Domiciano Dantas Martins, Paulo Rogério Ferreti Bonan, Edson Hilan Gomes de Lucena\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09287329251341085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveEvaluate the usability and user satisfaction of an oral medicine application among public health professionals.MethodsA cross-sectional observational study was conducted with 101 dentists registered in the application, determined through sample size calculation. Data were collected using an online questionnaire. The System Usability Scale (SyUS) was used to assess usability, and an adapted questionnaire evaluated user satisfaction. Variables influencing satisfaction and usability were also analyzed.ResultsMost participants were female (73.3%), aged between 20 and 59 years (98%), with up to 10 years of professional experience (73%). The majority had a specialization (81%), including 24.8% in Collective and Family Health, and 80.2% worked in Primary Health Care. The mean SyUS usability score was 91.25 (scale: 0-100), exceeding the threshold of 70 for a viable product. Participants expressed high satisfaction with the app's theoretical and clinical support. Suggested improvements included a lesion database, chat functionality, interactive notifications, expanded attachment capacity, training initiatives, and broader specialty coverage.ConclusionThe application achieved high usability and satisfaction scores, proving essential, intuitive, and effective. It complements public health systems by supporting diagnosis and treatment, enhancing professional collaboration, and improving care quality while addressing continuity and problem-solving needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9287329251341085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329251341085\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329251341085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价某口腔药物应用程序在公共卫生专业人员中的可用性和用户满意度。方法对101名注册牙医进行横断面观察研究,通过样本量计算确定。数据是通过在线问卷收集的。系统可用性量表(SyUS)用于评估可用性,并采用适应性问卷评估用户满意度。对影响满意度和可用性的变量进行了分析。结果大多数参与者为女性(73.3%),年龄在20 - 59岁之间(98%),拥有高达10年的专业经验(73%)。大多数人有专业(81%),其中24.8%从事集体和家庭卫生工作,80.2%从事初级卫生保健工作。SyUS可用性平均得分为91.25分(评分范围:0-100),超过了可行产品的70分阈值。参与者对该应用的理论和临床支持表示高度满意。建议的改进包括病变数据库、聊天功能、交互式通知、扩展附件容量、培训计划和更广泛的专业覆盖。结论该应用程序获得了较高的可用性和满意度,证明了该应用程序是必要的、直观的、有效的。它通过支持诊断和治疗、加强专业协作和提高护理质量来补充公共卫生系统,同时解决连续性和解决问题的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Telehealth in oral medicine: Evaluation of app usability and satisfaction among public health system professionals.

ObjectiveEvaluate the usability and user satisfaction of an oral medicine application among public health professionals.MethodsA cross-sectional observational study was conducted with 101 dentists registered in the application, determined through sample size calculation. Data were collected using an online questionnaire. The System Usability Scale (SyUS) was used to assess usability, and an adapted questionnaire evaluated user satisfaction. Variables influencing satisfaction and usability were also analyzed.ResultsMost participants were female (73.3%), aged between 20 and 59 years (98%), with up to 10 years of professional experience (73%). The majority had a specialization (81%), including 24.8% in Collective and Family Health, and 80.2% worked in Primary Health Care. The mean SyUS usability score was 91.25 (scale: 0-100), exceeding the threshold of 70 for a viable product. Participants expressed high satisfaction with the app's theoretical and clinical support. Suggested improvements included a lesion database, chat functionality, interactive notifications, expanded attachment capacity, training initiatives, and broader specialty coverage.ConclusionThe application achieved high usability and satisfaction scores, proving essential, intuitive, and effective. It complements public health systems by supporting diagnosis and treatment, enhancing professional collaboration, and improving care quality while addressing continuity and problem-solving needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Health Care
Technology and Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
282
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered: 1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables. 2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words. Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics. 4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors. 5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信