Maria do Desterro Andrêzza Souza Costa, Quemuel Pereira da Silva, Hélder Domiciano Dantas Martins, Paulo Rogério Ferreti Bonan, Edson Hilan Gomes de Lucena
{"title":"口腔医学中的远程医疗:公共卫生系统专业人员对应用程序可用性和满意度的评估。","authors":"Maria do Desterro Andrêzza Souza Costa, Quemuel Pereira da Silva, Hélder Domiciano Dantas Martins, Paulo Rogério Ferreti Bonan, Edson Hilan Gomes de Lucena","doi":"10.1177/09287329251341085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveEvaluate the usability and user satisfaction of an oral medicine application among public health professionals.MethodsA cross-sectional observational study was conducted with 101 dentists registered in the application, determined through sample size calculation. Data were collected using an online questionnaire. The System Usability Scale (SyUS) was used to assess usability, and an adapted questionnaire evaluated user satisfaction. Variables influencing satisfaction and usability were also analyzed.ResultsMost participants were female (73.3%), aged between 20 and 59 years (98%), with up to 10 years of professional experience (73%). The majority had a specialization (81%), including 24.8% in Collective and Family Health, and 80.2% worked in Primary Health Care. The mean SyUS usability score was 91.25 (scale: 0-100), exceeding the threshold of 70 for a viable product. Participants expressed high satisfaction with the app's theoretical and clinical support. Suggested improvements included a lesion database, chat functionality, interactive notifications, expanded attachment capacity, training initiatives, and broader specialty coverage.ConclusionThe application achieved high usability and satisfaction scores, proving essential, intuitive, and effective. It complements public health systems by supporting diagnosis and treatment, enhancing professional collaboration, and improving care quality while addressing continuity and problem-solving needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"9287329251341085"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telehealth in oral medicine: Evaluation of app usability and satisfaction among public health system professionals.\",\"authors\":\"Maria do Desterro Andrêzza Souza Costa, Quemuel Pereira da Silva, Hélder Domiciano Dantas Martins, Paulo Rogério Ferreti Bonan, Edson Hilan Gomes de Lucena\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09287329251341085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveEvaluate the usability and user satisfaction of an oral medicine application among public health professionals.MethodsA cross-sectional observational study was conducted with 101 dentists registered in the application, determined through sample size calculation. Data were collected using an online questionnaire. The System Usability Scale (SyUS) was used to assess usability, and an adapted questionnaire evaluated user satisfaction. Variables influencing satisfaction and usability were also analyzed.ResultsMost participants were female (73.3%), aged between 20 and 59 years (98%), with up to 10 years of professional experience (73%). The majority had a specialization (81%), including 24.8% in Collective and Family Health, and 80.2% worked in Primary Health Care. The mean SyUS usability score was 91.25 (scale: 0-100), exceeding the threshold of 70 for a viable product. Participants expressed high satisfaction with the app's theoretical and clinical support. Suggested improvements included a lesion database, chat functionality, interactive notifications, expanded attachment capacity, training initiatives, and broader specialty coverage.ConclusionThe application achieved high usability and satisfaction scores, proving essential, intuitive, and effective. It complements public health systems by supporting diagnosis and treatment, enhancing professional collaboration, and improving care quality while addressing continuity and problem-solving needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9287329251341085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329251341085\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329251341085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Telehealth in oral medicine: Evaluation of app usability and satisfaction among public health system professionals.
ObjectiveEvaluate the usability and user satisfaction of an oral medicine application among public health professionals.MethodsA cross-sectional observational study was conducted with 101 dentists registered in the application, determined through sample size calculation. Data were collected using an online questionnaire. The System Usability Scale (SyUS) was used to assess usability, and an adapted questionnaire evaluated user satisfaction. Variables influencing satisfaction and usability were also analyzed.ResultsMost participants were female (73.3%), aged between 20 and 59 years (98%), with up to 10 years of professional experience (73%). The majority had a specialization (81%), including 24.8% in Collective and Family Health, and 80.2% worked in Primary Health Care. The mean SyUS usability score was 91.25 (scale: 0-100), exceeding the threshold of 70 for a viable product. Participants expressed high satisfaction with the app's theoretical and clinical support. Suggested improvements included a lesion database, chat functionality, interactive notifications, expanded attachment capacity, training initiatives, and broader specialty coverage.ConclusionThe application achieved high usability and satisfaction scores, proving essential, intuitive, and effective. It complements public health systems by supporting diagnosis and treatment, enhancing professional collaboration, and improving care quality while addressing continuity and problem-solving needs.
期刊介绍:
Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered:
1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables.
2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words.
Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics.
4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors.
5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).