碎屑机设计对HFRP/Al复合材料钻孔刀具寿命和孔完整性的评价。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Muhammad Zubair Afzal, Sarmad Ali Khan, Muhammad Umar Farooq, Atif Javaid, Saqib Anwar, Adeolu A Adediran
{"title":"碎屑机设计对HFRP/Al复合材料钻孔刀具寿命和孔完整性的评价。","authors":"Muhammad Zubair Afzal, Sarmad Ali Khan, Muhammad Umar Farooq, Atif Javaid, Saqib Anwar, Adeolu A Adediran","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-03793-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, drilling of a newly developed lightweight fire-retardant carbon/glass-fiber-reinforced polymer epoxy sandwich that includes an aluminum honeycomb core with modified epoxy (HFRP/Al sandwich composite) is investigated. A new high-performance insert combination comprising central-stepped and peripheral-wiper inserts is evaluated. The geometry of the central insert is kept constant while two variations in chip breaker (C<sub>B</sub>) designs are introduced on wiper inserts differentiated mainly based on C<sub>B</sub> width and C<sub>B</sub> depth. Variation one abbreviated as LM geometry has a C<sub>B</sub> depth of 65 μm and a C<sub>B</sub> width of 1000 μm while the second variation terms as GT geometry has a C<sub>B</sub> depth of 20 μm and a C<sub>B</sub> width of 720 μm. This study is conducted in two phases at a constant speed (CS) of 50 m/min in a dry-cutting environment. Phase I involved four tests, in each test ten holes are drilled with LM and GT geometries at two different feed rates (0.08 and 0.16 mm/rev). Based on reduced diametric error, and delamination, tests with a feed rate (FR) of 0.08 mm/rev are selected for Phase-II analysis, which involves the evaluation of tool life testing. The results in terms of tool life, diametric error, and delamination factors are reported. Notably, the GT geometry of the wiper inserts outperformed the LM geometry in terms of 33% higher tool life compared to its LM counterpart. In addition, the diametric error and delamination factor are substantially lower with the former geometry in comparison to the latter one. The better performance of GT geometry is attributed to its better chip flow and robust design.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"18521"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12116915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of chip breaker designs on tool life and hole integrity in drilling of HFRP/Al composite.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Zubair Afzal, Sarmad Ali Khan, Muhammad Umar Farooq, Atif Javaid, Saqib Anwar, Adeolu A Adediran\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-03793-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this study, drilling of a newly developed lightweight fire-retardant carbon/glass-fiber-reinforced polymer epoxy sandwich that includes an aluminum honeycomb core with modified epoxy (HFRP/Al sandwich composite) is investigated. A new high-performance insert combination comprising central-stepped and peripheral-wiper inserts is evaluated. The geometry of the central insert is kept constant while two variations in chip breaker (C<sub>B</sub>) designs are introduced on wiper inserts differentiated mainly based on C<sub>B</sub> width and C<sub>B</sub> depth. Variation one abbreviated as LM geometry has a C<sub>B</sub> depth of 65 μm and a C<sub>B</sub> width of 1000 μm while the second variation terms as GT geometry has a C<sub>B</sub> depth of 20 μm and a C<sub>B</sub> width of 720 μm. This study is conducted in two phases at a constant speed (CS) of 50 m/min in a dry-cutting environment. Phase I involved four tests, in each test ten holes are drilled with LM and GT geometries at two different feed rates (0.08 and 0.16 mm/rev). Based on reduced diametric error, and delamination, tests with a feed rate (FR) of 0.08 mm/rev are selected for Phase-II analysis, which involves the evaluation of tool life testing. The results in terms of tool life, diametric error, and delamination factors are reported. Notably, the GT geometry of the wiper inserts outperformed the LM geometry in terms of 33% higher tool life compared to its LM counterpart. In addition, the diametric error and delamination factor are substantially lower with the former geometry in comparison to the latter one. The better performance of GT geometry is attributed to its better chip flow and robust design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"18521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12116915/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03793-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03793-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,研究了一种新开发的轻质阻燃碳/玻璃纤维增强聚合物环氧夹层材料(HFRP/Al夹层复合材料)的钻削过程,该夹层材料包括改性环氧树脂的铝蜂窝芯。评估了一种新的高性能插入组合,包括中央阶梯和外围刮刀插入。中央刀片的几何形状保持不变,而刮刀刀片的两种设计变化主要基于刀片宽度和刀片深度来区分。第一个变化项称为LM几何,其CB深度为65 μm, CB宽度为1000 μm;第二个变化项称为GT几何,其CB深度为20 μm, CB宽度为720 μm。本研究在干式切削环境中以50 m/min的等速(CS)分两阶段进行。第一阶段包括四项测试,在每个测试中,以两种不同的进给速率(0.08和0.16 mm/rev)钻10个LM和GT几何形状的孔。基于减小的直径误差和分层,选择0.08 mm/rev进给速率(FR)进行第二阶段分析,这涉及到刀具寿命测试的评估。报告了刀具寿命、直径误差和分层因素方面的结果。值得注意的是,GT几何形状的刮水器刀片比LM几何形状的刮水器刀片的工具寿命高出33%。此外,前者的直径误差和分层系数明显低于后者。GT几何结构的良好性能归功于其更好的芯片流动和稳健设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of chip breaker designs on tool life and hole integrity in drilling of HFRP/Al composite.

In this study, drilling of a newly developed lightweight fire-retardant carbon/glass-fiber-reinforced polymer epoxy sandwich that includes an aluminum honeycomb core with modified epoxy (HFRP/Al sandwich composite) is investigated. A new high-performance insert combination comprising central-stepped and peripheral-wiper inserts is evaluated. The geometry of the central insert is kept constant while two variations in chip breaker (CB) designs are introduced on wiper inserts differentiated mainly based on CB width and CB depth. Variation one abbreviated as LM geometry has a CB depth of 65 μm and a CB width of 1000 μm while the second variation terms as GT geometry has a CB depth of 20 μm and a CB width of 720 μm. This study is conducted in two phases at a constant speed (CS) of 50 m/min in a dry-cutting environment. Phase I involved four tests, in each test ten holes are drilled with LM and GT geometries at two different feed rates (0.08 and 0.16 mm/rev). Based on reduced diametric error, and delamination, tests with a feed rate (FR) of 0.08 mm/rev are selected for Phase-II analysis, which involves the evaluation of tool life testing. The results in terms of tool life, diametric error, and delamination factors are reported. Notably, the GT geometry of the wiper inserts outperformed the LM geometry in terms of 33% higher tool life compared to its LM counterpart. In addition, the diametric error and delamination factor are substantially lower with the former geometry in comparison to the latter one. The better performance of GT geometry is attributed to its better chip flow and robust design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信