{"title":"评估、策略和治疗方案:透明质酸填充剂对中国患者鼻唇襞的评估、策略和治疗。","authors":"Qin Li, Haiyan Cui, Fang-Wen Tseng, Qingyang Liu, Zhiqiang Xue, Jani van Loghem, Kai-Chih Hung, Lijun Zhou, Wen Xie, Jingjing Zhao","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Causes contributing to nasolabial fold (NLF) appearance can be multifactorial, hence requiring distinct dermal filler strategies. We devised 4 assessment, strategy, and treatment (AST) injection protocols, incorporating NLF etiology and severity, patient expectations, and the selection of Belotero Balance Lidocaine (BBL) and Belotero Volume Lidocaine (BVL) hyaluronic acid fillers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The underlying etiology and photonumeric assessments of NLF severity guided protocol selection. In protocol 1, the NLF was injected directly with BBL into the mid-to-deep dermis and/or immediate subdermal plane. In protocol 2, BVL was injected using dual-plane sandwich technique into the canine fossa and subcutaneous layers. Protocol 3 combined indirect injections of BVL into the deep medial cheek fat compartment and preauricular hollows to lift ptotic soft tissue, followed by direct NLF injections with protocols 1 and 2. In protocol 4, BVL was injected into the temple and/or jawline, in combination with midface augmentation (AST protocol 3) and direct NLF injections (AST protocols 1 and 2) to fully address all underlying etiologies contributing to NLF appearance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AST protocols facilitate treatment customization to each patient's NLF etiology and severity through direct and indirect approaches. At 30 days, NLF severity improved visibly and satisfactorily. Improvements varied from effacement of superficial nasolabial wrinkles to shallower NLF depth, improvement in cheek projection and nasojugal groove appearance, and smoother submalar contours.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AST protocols provide a strategic reference for combining BBL and BVL in a personalized patient-centric approach for effective, holistic, and balanced NLF corrections and pan-facial aesthetic improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 5","pages":"e6792"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12113924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Assessment, Strategy, and Treatment Protocol: Nasolabial Fold Assessment, Strategy, and Treatment With Hyaluronic Acid Fillers in Chinese Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Qin Li, Haiyan Cui, Fang-Wen Tseng, Qingyang Liu, Zhiqiang Xue, Jani van Loghem, Kai-Chih Hung, Lijun Zhou, Wen Xie, Jingjing Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Causes contributing to nasolabial fold (NLF) appearance can be multifactorial, hence requiring distinct dermal filler strategies. We devised 4 assessment, strategy, and treatment (AST) injection protocols, incorporating NLF etiology and severity, patient expectations, and the selection of Belotero Balance Lidocaine (BBL) and Belotero Volume Lidocaine (BVL) hyaluronic acid fillers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The underlying etiology and photonumeric assessments of NLF severity guided protocol selection. In protocol 1, the NLF was injected directly with BBL into the mid-to-deep dermis and/or immediate subdermal plane. In protocol 2, BVL was injected using dual-plane sandwich technique into the canine fossa and subcutaneous layers. Protocol 3 combined indirect injections of BVL into the deep medial cheek fat compartment and preauricular hollows to lift ptotic soft tissue, followed by direct NLF injections with protocols 1 and 2. In protocol 4, BVL was injected into the temple and/or jawline, in combination with midface augmentation (AST protocol 3) and direct NLF injections (AST protocols 1 and 2) to fully address all underlying etiologies contributing to NLF appearance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AST protocols facilitate treatment customization to each patient's NLF etiology and severity through direct and indirect approaches. At 30 days, NLF severity improved visibly and satisfactorily. Improvements varied from effacement of superficial nasolabial wrinkles to shallower NLF depth, improvement in cheek projection and nasojugal groove appearance, and smoother submalar contours.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AST protocols provide a strategic reference for combining BBL and BVL in a personalized patient-centric approach for effective, holistic, and balanced NLF corrections and pan-facial aesthetic improvements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"13 5\",\"pages\":\"e6792\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12113924/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006792\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Assessment, Strategy, and Treatment Protocol: Nasolabial Fold Assessment, Strategy, and Treatment With Hyaluronic Acid Fillers in Chinese Patients.
Background: Causes contributing to nasolabial fold (NLF) appearance can be multifactorial, hence requiring distinct dermal filler strategies. We devised 4 assessment, strategy, and treatment (AST) injection protocols, incorporating NLF etiology and severity, patient expectations, and the selection of Belotero Balance Lidocaine (BBL) and Belotero Volume Lidocaine (BVL) hyaluronic acid fillers.
Methods: The underlying etiology and photonumeric assessments of NLF severity guided protocol selection. In protocol 1, the NLF was injected directly with BBL into the mid-to-deep dermis and/or immediate subdermal plane. In protocol 2, BVL was injected using dual-plane sandwich technique into the canine fossa and subcutaneous layers. Protocol 3 combined indirect injections of BVL into the deep medial cheek fat compartment and preauricular hollows to lift ptotic soft tissue, followed by direct NLF injections with protocols 1 and 2. In protocol 4, BVL was injected into the temple and/or jawline, in combination with midface augmentation (AST protocol 3) and direct NLF injections (AST protocols 1 and 2) to fully address all underlying etiologies contributing to NLF appearance.
Results: AST protocols facilitate treatment customization to each patient's NLF etiology and severity through direct and indirect approaches. At 30 days, NLF severity improved visibly and satisfactorily. Improvements varied from effacement of superficial nasolabial wrinkles to shallower NLF depth, improvement in cheek projection and nasojugal groove appearance, and smoother submalar contours.
Conclusions: The AST protocols provide a strategic reference for combining BBL and BVL in a personalized patient-centric approach for effective, holistic, and balanced NLF corrections and pan-facial aesthetic improvements.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.