中风后和多发性硬化症患者的肉毒杆菌毒素痉挛管理:一项回顾性,“真实世界”,多中心研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
NeuroRehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-28 DOI:10.1177/10538135251329322
Calogera Butera, Marcello Esposito, Trinchillo Assunta, Morena Giovannelli, Anna Rivaroli, Mario Pata, Mathieu Beneteau, Massimo Filippi, Patrizia M Caglioni, Ubaldo Del Carro
{"title":"中风后和多发性硬化症患者的肉毒杆菌毒素痉挛管理:一项回顾性,“真实世界”,多中心研究。","authors":"Calogera Butera, Marcello Esposito, Trinchillo Assunta, Morena Giovannelli, Anna Rivaroli, Mario Pata, Mathieu Beneteau, Massimo Filippi, Patrizia M Caglioni, Ubaldo Del Carro","doi":"10.1177/10538135251329322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundWhile there is strong evidence for botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) in post-stroke spasticity, there is a paucity of data in multiple sclerosis and other conditions in real-world settings.ObjectiveDocument the use of BoNT-A in the management of spasticity, with focus on the treatment of spasticity due to stroke and multiple sclerosis.MethodsThis noninterventional, retrospective study included all adults treated for upper and/or lower limb spasticity (any etiology) at three centers in Italy who received ≥3 BoNT-A injection cycles between 2008 and 2018.ResultsInjection data from 149 patients were analyzed (n = 67 post-stroke, n = 47 MS, n = 35 other etiologies). The median treatment duration was 54.9 months in the post-stroke population and 41.9 months in the MS population. Total doses for the commercially available BoNT-A formulations were typically lower than approved for use in spasticity; we also observed clinically relevant differences in the muscle patterns treated between the MS and post-stroke indications. Regardless of etiology, most patients were satisfied with treatment.ConclusionsThis retrospective study provides a snapshot of spasticity management for patients referred for BoNT-A treatment. Most patients were satisfied with their treatment over several cycles and the data support the effectiveness of BoNT-A for focal spasticity regardless of etiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"48-57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spasticity Management with Botulinum Toxin in Post-stroke and Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Retrospective, 'Real-world', Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Calogera Butera, Marcello Esposito, Trinchillo Assunta, Morena Giovannelli, Anna Rivaroli, Mario Pata, Mathieu Beneteau, Massimo Filippi, Patrizia M Caglioni, Ubaldo Del Carro\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10538135251329322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundWhile there is strong evidence for botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) in post-stroke spasticity, there is a paucity of data in multiple sclerosis and other conditions in real-world settings.ObjectiveDocument the use of BoNT-A in the management of spasticity, with focus on the treatment of spasticity due to stroke and multiple sclerosis.MethodsThis noninterventional, retrospective study included all adults treated for upper and/or lower limb spasticity (any etiology) at three centers in Italy who received ≥3 BoNT-A injection cycles between 2008 and 2018.ResultsInjection data from 149 patients were analyzed (n = 67 post-stroke, n = 47 MS, n = 35 other etiologies). The median treatment duration was 54.9 months in the post-stroke population and 41.9 months in the MS population. Total doses for the commercially available BoNT-A formulations were typically lower than approved for use in spasticity; we also observed clinically relevant differences in the muscle patterns treated between the MS and post-stroke indications. Regardless of etiology, most patients were satisfied with treatment.ConclusionsThis retrospective study provides a snapshot of spasticity management for patients referred for BoNT-A treatment. Most patients were satisfied with their treatment over several cycles and the data support the effectiveness of BoNT-A for focal spasticity regardless of etiology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NeuroRehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"48-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NeuroRehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135251329322\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135251329322","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然有强有力的证据表明肉毒杆菌毒素a (BoNT-A)与中风后痉挛有关,但在多发性硬化症和现实环境中的其他疾病中缺乏相关数据。目的记录BoNT-A在痉挛治疗中的应用,重点关注脑卒中和多发性硬化症所致痉挛的治疗。方法:这项非介入性、回顾性研究纳入了意大利三个中心接受上肢和/或下肢痉挛(任何病因)治疗的所有成年人,这些成年人在2008年至2018年期间接受了≥3次BoNT-A注射周期。结果分析了149例患者的注射数据(脑卒中后67例,MS 47例,其他病因35例)。卒中后人群的中位治疗持续时间为54.9个月,多发性硬化症人群为41.9个月。市售BoNT-A制剂的总剂量通常低于批准用于痉挛的剂量;我们还观察到在多发性硬化症和中风后适应症之间治疗的肌肉模式的临床相关差异。无论病因如何,大多数患者对治疗满意。结论:本回顾性研究为接受BoNT-A治疗的患者提供了痉挛管理的快照。大多数患者在几个周期内对他们的治疗感到满意,数据支持BoNT-A治疗局灶性痉挛的有效性,无论病因如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spasticity Management with Botulinum Toxin in Post-stroke and Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Retrospective, 'Real-world', Multicenter Study.

BackgroundWhile there is strong evidence for botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) in post-stroke spasticity, there is a paucity of data in multiple sclerosis and other conditions in real-world settings.ObjectiveDocument the use of BoNT-A in the management of spasticity, with focus on the treatment of spasticity due to stroke and multiple sclerosis.MethodsThis noninterventional, retrospective study included all adults treated for upper and/or lower limb spasticity (any etiology) at three centers in Italy who received ≥3 BoNT-A injection cycles between 2008 and 2018.ResultsInjection data from 149 patients were analyzed (n = 67 post-stroke, n = 47 MS, n = 35 other etiologies). The median treatment duration was 54.9 months in the post-stroke population and 41.9 months in the MS population. Total doses for the commercially available BoNT-A formulations were typically lower than approved for use in spasticity; we also observed clinically relevant differences in the muscle patterns treated between the MS and post-stroke indications. Regardless of etiology, most patients were satisfied with treatment.ConclusionsThis retrospective study provides a snapshot of spasticity management for patients referred for BoNT-A treatment. Most patients were satisfied with their treatment over several cycles and the data support the effectiveness of BoNT-A for focal spasticity regardless of etiology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信