土壤微生物群落空间异质性影响其作为农业生产力评价生物指标的适宜性

IF 4.1 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Guoqiang Li, Xuanjing Li, Ting Jin, Muyilan Jiang, Peng Shi, Gehong Wei
{"title":"土壤微生物群落空间异质性影响其作为农业生产力评价生物指标的适宜性","authors":"Guoqiang Li, Xuanjing Li, Ting Jin, Muyilan Jiang, Peng Shi, Gehong Wei","doi":"10.3390/microorganisms13051160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Soil microorganisms are increasingly recognized as critical regulators of farmland soil fertility and crop productivity. However, the impacts of spatial heterogeneity in soil microbial communities on bioindicators for evaluating agricultural practices remain poorly understood and warrant further validation. Through field experiments, this study investigated the differential effects of agricultural practice treatments on soil properties and bacterial communities between two main farmland soil compartments: intra-row and inter-row. Additionally, we explored the potential correlations between key taxa and soil properties, as well as maize biomass. Results revealed marked disparities in soil properties, bacterial community compositions, and co-occurrence network patterns between intra-row and inter-row soils. Agricultural practice treatments exerted significant impacts on bacterial community structures and network topological features in both intra-row and inter-row soils. Subsequent correlation analysis demonstrated strong relationships between soil properties and most keystone species. In addition, 42 and 41 indicator species were identified in intra-row and inter-row soils, respectively, including shared genera such as <i>Solirubrobacter</i>, <i>Blastococcus</i>, <i>Iamia</i>, <i>Conexibacter</i>, and <i>Lysobacter</i>. Notably, 22 key indicator species in intra-row soils displayed significant positive/negative correlations with maize biomass, whereas only 4 key indicator species showed negative correlations in inter-row soils. These findings highlight differential responses of bacterial communities to agricultural practices in distinct soil compartments. The intra-row soils harbored more bacterial taxa significantly associated with maize biomass, while the inter-row soils better reflected the effects of agricultural interventions. This study confirms the spatial variability of microbial communities as effective bioindicators for evaluating agricultural practice strategies. Identification of compartment-specific indicators provides novel microbiological insights into supporting precision agriculture practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":18667,"journal":{"name":"Microorganisms","volume":"13 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12113728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial Heterogeneity in Soil Microbial Communities Impacts Their Suitability as Bioindicators for Evaluating Productivity in Agricultural Practices.\",\"authors\":\"Guoqiang Li, Xuanjing Li, Ting Jin, Muyilan Jiang, Peng Shi, Gehong Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/microorganisms13051160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Soil microorganisms are increasingly recognized as critical regulators of farmland soil fertility and crop productivity. However, the impacts of spatial heterogeneity in soil microbial communities on bioindicators for evaluating agricultural practices remain poorly understood and warrant further validation. Through field experiments, this study investigated the differential effects of agricultural practice treatments on soil properties and bacterial communities between two main farmland soil compartments: intra-row and inter-row. Additionally, we explored the potential correlations between key taxa and soil properties, as well as maize biomass. Results revealed marked disparities in soil properties, bacterial community compositions, and co-occurrence network patterns between intra-row and inter-row soils. Agricultural practice treatments exerted significant impacts on bacterial community structures and network topological features in both intra-row and inter-row soils. Subsequent correlation analysis demonstrated strong relationships between soil properties and most keystone species. In addition, 42 and 41 indicator species were identified in intra-row and inter-row soils, respectively, including shared genera such as <i>Solirubrobacter</i>, <i>Blastococcus</i>, <i>Iamia</i>, <i>Conexibacter</i>, and <i>Lysobacter</i>. Notably, 22 key indicator species in intra-row soils displayed significant positive/negative correlations with maize biomass, whereas only 4 key indicator species showed negative correlations in inter-row soils. These findings highlight differential responses of bacterial communities to agricultural practices in distinct soil compartments. The intra-row soils harbored more bacterial taxa significantly associated with maize biomass, while the inter-row soils better reflected the effects of agricultural interventions. This study confirms the spatial variability of microbial communities as effective bioindicators for evaluating agricultural practice strategies. Identification of compartment-specific indicators provides novel microbiological insights into supporting precision agriculture practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microorganisms\",\"volume\":\"13 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12113728/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microorganisms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13051160\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microorganisms","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13051160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤微生物越来越被认为是农田土壤肥力和作物生产力的重要调节者。然而,土壤微生物群落的空间异质性对评估农业实践的生物指标的影响仍然知之甚少,需要进一步验证。通过田间试验,研究了不同耕作方式对行内和行间农田土壤性状和细菌群落的差异影响。此外,我们还探讨了关键分类群与土壤性质以及玉米生物量之间的潜在相关性。结果表明,行内和行间土壤在土壤性质、细菌群落组成和共生网络模式上存在显著差异。农业实践处理对行内和行间土壤细菌群落结构和网络拓扑特征均有显著影响。随后的相关分析表明,土壤性质与大多数关键物种之间存在很强的相关性。此外,在行内和行间土壤中分别鉴定出42种和41种指示种,包括Solirubrobacter、Blastococcus、Iamia、Conexibacter和Lysobacter等共有属。行内土壤22种关键指标与玉米生物量呈显著正相关/负相关,行间土壤只有4种关键指标与玉米生物量呈显著负相关。这些发现强调了不同土壤区室中细菌群落对农业实践的不同反应。行内土壤细菌类群较多,与玉米生物量显著相关,行间土壤细菌类群较好地反映了农业干预的效果。该研究证实了微生物群落的空间变异是评价农业实践策略的有效生物指标。区室特异性指标的鉴定为支持精准农业实践提供了新的微生物见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spatial Heterogeneity in Soil Microbial Communities Impacts Their Suitability as Bioindicators for Evaluating Productivity in Agricultural Practices.

Soil microorganisms are increasingly recognized as critical regulators of farmland soil fertility and crop productivity. However, the impacts of spatial heterogeneity in soil microbial communities on bioindicators for evaluating agricultural practices remain poorly understood and warrant further validation. Through field experiments, this study investigated the differential effects of agricultural practice treatments on soil properties and bacterial communities between two main farmland soil compartments: intra-row and inter-row. Additionally, we explored the potential correlations between key taxa and soil properties, as well as maize biomass. Results revealed marked disparities in soil properties, bacterial community compositions, and co-occurrence network patterns between intra-row and inter-row soils. Agricultural practice treatments exerted significant impacts on bacterial community structures and network topological features in both intra-row and inter-row soils. Subsequent correlation analysis demonstrated strong relationships between soil properties and most keystone species. In addition, 42 and 41 indicator species were identified in intra-row and inter-row soils, respectively, including shared genera such as Solirubrobacter, Blastococcus, Iamia, Conexibacter, and Lysobacter. Notably, 22 key indicator species in intra-row soils displayed significant positive/negative correlations with maize biomass, whereas only 4 key indicator species showed negative correlations in inter-row soils. These findings highlight differential responses of bacterial communities to agricultural practices in distinct soil compartments. The intra-row soils harbored more bacterial taxa significantly associated with maize biomass, while the inter-row soils better reflected the effects of agricultural interventions. This study confirms the spatial variability of microbial communities as effective bioindicators for evaluating agricultural practice strategies. Identification of compartment-specific indicators provides novel microbiological insights into supporting precision agriculture practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microorganisms
Microorganisms Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2168
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: Microorganisms (ISSN 2076-2607) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and prions. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation or experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary electronic material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信