伴有和不伴有活动性癌症的住院卒中患者的预后。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hiroyuki Kawano, Ayumi Sakurai, Yuuki Takizawa, Risa Toyota, Reona Miwa, Hayate Onuki, Ayane Kawatake, Atsushi Yamamichi, Mikito Saito, Kaoru Nakanishi, Eisaku Tsuji, Shinya Tomari, Yuko Honda, Yoshiko Unno, Mayumi Uchida, Teruyuki Hirano
{"title":"伴有和不伴有活动性癌症的住院卒中患者的预后。","authors":"Hiroyuki Kawano, Ayumi Sakurai, Yuuki Takizawa, Risa Toyota, Reona Miwa, Hayate Onuki, Ayane Kawatake, Atsushi Yamamichi, Mikito Saito, Kaoru Nakanishi, Eisaku Tsuji, Shinya Tomari, Yuko Honda, Yoshiko Unno, Mayumi Uchida, Teruyuki Hirano","doi":"10.1007/s11239-025-03117-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer is common in patients with ischemic stroke. The aim was to reveal the differences in acute management and outcomes of patients with in-hospital acute ischemic stroke (IHS) with and without active cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred IHS patients (58% male, median age 78 years, median NIHSS score 9) from August 2016 to July 2023 at our institution were divided into two groups: 70 with active cancer (IHS-AC 35%) and 130 without AC (IHS-nonAC 65%). Patients' characteristics, time intervals, and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. A good clinical outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale score 0-3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IHS was identified most frequently by a nurse (IHS-AC group 67%, IHS-nonAC group 71%). Time from recognition to stroke physician assessment (37 vs. 90 min, p = 0.008) was shorter in the IHS-AC group. Good clinical outcomes at discharge (31% in each group, p = 1.000) and in-hospital mortality (IHS-AC group 29%, IHS-nonAC group 21%, p = 0.225) were similar in the groups. The rates of reperfusion therapy (intravenous rt-PA and/or mechanical thrombectomy) were 16% in the IHS-AC group and 15% in the IHS-nonAC group (p = 1.000). The rates of good clinical outcomes and mortality at discharge in patients with reperfusion therapy were each 36%.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>One-third of IHS patients had comorbid active cancer. The rates of reperfusion therapy and good clinical outcomes were similar in groups with and without active cancer. Acute stroke management should not be withheld solely based on cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":17546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of patients with in-hospital stroke with and without active cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroyuki Kawano, Ayumi Sakurai, Yuuki Takizawa, Risa Toyota, Reona Miwa, Hayate Onuki, Ayane Kawatake, Atsushi Yamamichi, Mikito Saito, Kaoru Nakanishi, Eisaku Tsuji, Shinya Tomari, Yuko Honda, Yoshiko Unno, Mayumi Uchida, Teruyuki Hirano\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11239-025-03117-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer is common in patients with ischemic stroke. The aim was to reveal the differences in acute management and outcomes of patients with in-hospital acute ischemic stroke (IHS) with and without active cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred IHS patients (58% male, median age 78 years, median NIHSS score 9) from August 2016 to July 2023 at our institution were divided into two groups: 70 with active cancer (IHS-AC 35%) and 130 without AC (IHS-nonAC 65%). Patients' characteristics, time intervals, and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. A good clinical outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale score 0-3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IHS was identified most frequently by a nurse (IHS-AC group 67%, IHS-nonAC group 71%). Time from recognition to stroke physician assessment (37 vs. 90 min, p = 0.008) was shorter in the IHS-AC group. Good clinical outcomes at discharge (31% in each group, p = 1.000) and in-hospital mortality (IHS-AC group 29%, IHS-nonAC group 21%, p = 0.225) were similar in the groups. The rates of reperfusion therapy (intravenous rt-PA and/or mechanical thrombectomy) were 16% in the IHS-AC group and 15% in the IHS-nonAC group (p = 1.000). The rates of good clinical outcomes and mortality at discharge in patients with reperfusion therapy were each 36%.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>One-third of IHS patients had comorbid active cancer. The rates of reperfusion therapy and good clinical outcomes were similar in groups with and without active cancer. Acute stroke management should not be withheld solely based on cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-025-03117-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-025-03117-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:癌症在缺血性脑卒中患者中很常见。目的是揭示有和没有活动性癌症的住院急性缺血性脑卒中(IHS)患者的急性管理和预后的差异。方法:2016年8月至2023年7月,我院200例IHS患者(男性58%,中位年龄78岁,NIHSS中位评分9)分为两组:活动性癌70例(IHS-AC 35%)和非AC 130例(IHS- nonac 65%)。比较两组患者的特征、时间间隔和临床结果。改良Rankin量表评分0-3分为临床预后良好。结果:IHS最常被护士发现(IHS- ac组67%,IHS- nonac组71%)。IHS-AC组从识别到卒中医师评估的时间(37 vs. 90分钟,p = 0.008)更短。两组患者出院时的良好临床结局(各为31%,p = 1.000)和住院死亡率(hs - ac组29%,hs - nonac组21%,p = 0.225)相似。再灌注治疗(静脉注射rt-PA和/或机械取栓)的比率在IHS-AC组为16%,在IHS-nonAC组为15% (p = 1.000)。再灌注治疗患者的良好临床转归率和出院死亡率均为36%。讨论与结论:三分之一的IHS患者有合并症的活动性癌症。再灌注治疗的比率和良好的临床结果在有和没有活动性癌症组是相似的。急性中风的治疗不应该仅仅因为癌症而停止。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of patients with in-hospital stroke with and without active cancer.

Background: Cancer is common in patients with ischemic stroke. The aim was to reveal the differences in acute management and outcomes of patients with in-hospital acute ischemic stroke (IHS) with and without active cancer.

Methods: Two hundred IHS patients (58% male, median age 78 years, median NIHSS score 9) from August 2016 to July 2023 at our institution were divided into two groups: 70 with active cancer (IHS-AC 35%) and 130 without AC (IHS-nonAC 65%). Patients' characteristics, time intervals, and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. A good clinical outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale score 0-3.

Results: IHS was identified most frequently by a nurse (IHS-AC group 67%, IHS-nonAC group 71%). Time from recognition to stroke physician assessment (37 vs. 90 min, p = 0.008) was shorter in the IHS-AC group. Good clinical outcomes at discharge (31% in each group, p = 1.000) and in-hospital mortality (IHS-AC group 29%, IHS-nonAC group 21%, p = 0.225) were similar in the groups. The rates of reperfusion therapy (intravenous rt-PA and/or mechanical thrombectomy) were 16% in the IHS-AC group and 15% in the IHS-nonAC group (p = 1.000). The rates of good clinical outcomes and mortality at discharge in patients with reperfusion therapy were each 36%.

Discussion and conclusion: One-third of IHS patients had comorbid active cancer. The rates of reperfusion therapy and good clinical outcomes were similar in groups with and without active cancer. Acute stroke management should not be withheld solely based on cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis is a long-awaited resource for contemporary cardiologists, hematologists, vascular medicine specialists and clinician-scientists actively involved in treatment decisions and clinical investigation of thrombotic disorders involving the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems. The principal focus of the Journal centers on the pathobiology of thrombosis and vascular disorders and the use of anticoagulants, platelet antagonists, cell-based therapies and interventions in scientific investigation, clinical-translational research and patient care. The Journal will publish original work which emphasizes the interface between fundamental scientific principles and clinical investigation, stimulating an interdisciplinary and scholarly dialogue in thrombosis and vascular science. Published works will also define platforms for translational research, drug development, clinical trials and patient-directed applications. The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis'' integrated format will expand the reader''s knowledge base and provide important insights for both the investigation and direct clinical application of the most rapidly growing fields in medicine-thrombosis and vascular science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信