Lajos Pusztai, Vernon K Sondak, Raquel Aguiar-Ibáñez, Federico Cappuzzo, Christos Chouaid, Chris Elder, Yosuke Hirasawa, Masaru Ishida, Robert Jones, Seung Hyeun Lee, Ryuichi Mizuno, Masayoshi Nagata, David Okonji, Phillip Parente, Bhavesh Shah, Alexander Sun, Dominihemberg Ferreira, Carmel Spiteri, Andrea Lauer, Amrit Kaliasethi, Carol Kao, Smita Kothari, Jan McKendrick
{"title":"影响早期癌症治疗后再用抗pd -(L)1治疗的临床因素:一项修正的德尔菲共识研究","authors":"Lajos Pusztai, Vernon K Sondak, Raquel Aguiar-Ibáñez, Federico Cappuzzo, Christos Chouaid, Chris Elder, Yosuke Hirasawa, Masaru Ishida, Robert Jones, Seung Hyeun Lee, Ryuichi Mizuno, Masayoshi Nagata, David Okonji, Phillip Parente, Bhavesh Shah, Alexander Sun, Dominihemberg Ferreira, Carmel Spiteri, Andrea Lauer, Amrit Kaliasethi, Carol Kao, Smita Kothari, Jan McKendrick","doi":"10.1136/jitc-2024-011184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anti-programmed death (ligand) 1 (anti-PD-(L)1) therapies were first introduced in the metastatic setting and have since been approved and reimbursed for treating early-stage cancers in the adjuvant, perioperative, and neoadjuvant settings in many cancer types. Current evidence supporting anti-PD(L)-1 retreatment after relapse with prior neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant anti-PD(L)1 therapy is limited and inconclusive. There is no guidance for clinicians on how and when to retreat with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies when anti-PD-(L)1 therapy was administered in the neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting. This study aimed to reach consensus on factors to guide decision-making regarding retreatment with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies after prior therapy with an anti-PD-(L)1 agent. This modified Delphi study consisted of a clinician survey across 10 countries followed by three real-time virtual Delphi panels involving clinical experts who had completed the survey. Clinical experts were experienced in using anti-PD-(L)1 treatments in early-stage cancers and/or as retreatment of patients with recurrences following early-stage treatment with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies. Of 28 clinicians providing survey responses, 20 participated in one of three Delphi panels. There was consensus that retreatment can be defined as 'repeated treatment with the same therapeutic class following relapse after or during neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant treatment.' All three panels agreed that decisions around retreatment should consider 'prior immune-related adverse events/toxicity,' 'time-related factors' (eg, time since completion of full treatment course and since discontinuation) and 'previous patient response' (often referred to by clinicians as tumor response, which may have reflected their experience with metastatic disease). Other factors identified as important included country-specific practices, treatment availability, and reimbursement. Generally, the clinical experts considered that retreatment could be considered from ≥3 to 6 months after stopping initial anti-PD-(L)1 treatment, or from ≥6 months after relapse/recurrence. In conclusion, clinicians across different regions recognized a role for retreating patients with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies after initial anti-PD-(L)1 treatment for early-stage cancers. Consensus was reached on some factors to consider regarding whether and when to retreat, although differences in clinical practice between countries/geographical regions made it difficult to achieve consensus for some more nuanced elements of retreatment. Further evidence could help better inform retreatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14820,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","volume":"13 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical factors influencing retreatment with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies after treatment in early-stage cancers: a modified Delphi consensus study.\",\"authors\":\"Lajos Pusztai, Vernon K Sondak, Raquel Aguiar-Ibáñez, Federico Cappuzzo, Christos Chouaid, Chris Elder, Yosuke Hirasawa, Masaru Ishida, Robert Jones, Seung Hyeun Lee, Ryuichi Mizuno, Masayoshi Nagata, David Okonji, Phillip Parente, Bhavesh Shah, Alexander Sun, Dominihemberg Ferreira, Carmel Spiteri, Andrea Lauer, Amrit Kaliasethi, Carol Kao, Smita Kothari, Jan McKendrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jitc-2024-011184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Anti-programmed death (ligand) 1 (anti-PD-(L)1) therapies were first introduced in the metastatic setting and have since been approved and reimbursed for treating early-stage cancers in the adjuvant, perioperative, and neoadjuvant settings in many cancer types. Current evidence supporting anti-PD(L)-1 retreatment after relapse with prior neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant anti-PD(L)1 therapy is limited and inconclusive. There is no guidance for clinicians on how and when to retreat with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies when anti-PD-(L)1 therapy was administered in the neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting. This study aimed to reach consensus on factors to guide decision-making regarding retreatment with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies after prior therapy with an anti-PD-(L)1 agent. This modified Delphi study consisted of a clinician survey across 10 countries followed by three real-time virtual Delphi panels involving clinical experts who had completed the survey. Clinical experts were experienced in using anti-PD-(L)1 treatments in early-stage cancers and/or as retreatment of patients with recurrences following early-stage treatment with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies. Of 28 clinicians providing survey responses, 20 participated in one of three Delphi panels. There was consensus that retreatment can be defined as 'repeated treatment with the same therapeutic class following relapse after or during neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant treatment.' All three panels agreed that decisions around retreatment should consider 'prior immune-related adverse events/toxicity,' 'time-related factors' (eg, time since completion of full treatment course and since discontinuation) and 'previous patient response' (often referred to by clinicians as tumor response, which may have reflected their experience with metastatic disease). Other factors identified as important included country-specific practices, treatment availability, and reimbursement. Generally, the clinical experts considered that retreatment could be considered from ≥3 to 6 months after stopping initial anti-PD-(L)1 treatment, or from ≥6 months after relapse/recurrence. In conclusion, clinicians across different regions recognized a role for retreating patients with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies after initial anti-PD-(L)1 treatment for early-stage cancers. Consensus was reached on some factors to consider regarding whether and when to retreat, although differences in clinical practice between countries/geographical regions made it difficult to achieve consensus for some more nuanced elements of retreatment. Further evidence could help better inform retreatment decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer\",\"volume\":\"13 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-011184\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-011184","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical factors influencing retreatment with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies after treatment in early-stage cancers: a modified Delphi consensus study.
Anti-programmed death (ligand) 1 (anti-PD-(L)1) therapies were first introduced in the metastatic setting and have since been approved and reimbursed for treating early-stage cancers in the adjuvant, perioperative, and neoadjuvant settings in many cancer types. Current evidence supporting anti-PD(L)-1 retreatment after relapse with prior neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant anti-PD(L)1 therapy is limited and inconclusive. There is no guidance for clinicians on how and when to retreat with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies when anti-PD-(L)1 therapy was administered in the neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting. This study aimed to reach consensus on factors to guide decision-making regarding retreatment with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies after prior therapy with an anti-PD-(L)1 agent. This modified Delphi study consisted of a clinician survey across 10 countries followed by three real-time virtual Delphi panels involving clinical experts who had completed the survey. Clinical experts were experienced in using anti-PD-(L)1 treatments in early-stage cancers and/or as retreatment of patients with recurrences following early-stage treatment with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies. Of 28 clinicians providing survey responses, 20 participated in one of three Delphi panels. There was consensus that retreatment can be defined as 'repeated treatment with the same therapeutic class following relapse after or during neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant treatment.' All three panels agreed that decisions around retreatment should consider 'prior immune-related adverse events/toxicity,' 'time-related factors' (eg, time since completion of full treatment course and since discontinuation) and 'previous patient response' (often referred to by clinicians as tumor response, which may have reflected their experience with metastatic disease). Other factors identified as important included country-specific practices, treatment availability, and reimbursement. Generally, the clinical experts considered that retreatment could be considered from ≥3 to 6 months after stopping initial anti-PD-(L)1 treatment, or from ≥6 months after relapse/recurrence. In conclusion, clinicians across different regions recognized a role for retreating patients with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies after initial anti-PD-(L)1 treatment for early-stage cancers. Consensus was reached on some factors to consider regarding whether and when to retreat, although differences in clinical practice between countries/geographical regions made it difficult to achieve consensus for some more nuanced elements of retreatment. Further evidence could help better inform retreatment decisions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (JITC) is a peer-reviewed publication that promotes scientific exchange and deepens knowledge in the constantly evolving fields of tumor immunology and cancer immunotherapy. With an open access format, JITC encourages widespread access to its findings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, spanning from basic science to translational and clinical research. Key areas of interest include tumor-host interactions, the intricate tumor microenvironment, animal models, the identification of predictive and prognostic immune biomarkers, groundbreaking pharmaceutical and cellular therapies, innovative vaccines, combination immune-based treatments, and the study of immune-related toxicity.