影响早期癌症治疗后再用抗pd -(L)1治疗的临床因素:一项修正的德尔菲共识研究

IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Lajos Pusztai, Vernon K Sondak, Raquel Aguiar-Ibáñez, Federico Cappuzzo, Christos Chouaid, Chris Elder, Yosuke Hirasawa, Masaru Ishida, Robert Jones, Seung Hyeun Lee, Ryuichi Mizuno, Masayoshi Nagata, David Okonji, Phillip Parente, Bhavesh Shah, Alexander Sun, Dominihemberg Ferreira, Carmel Spiteri, Andrea Lauer, Amrit Kaliasethi, Carol Kao, Smita Kothari, Jan McKendrick
{"title":"影响早期癌症治疗后再用抗pd -(L)1治疗的临床因素:一项修正的德尔菲共识研究","authors":"Lajos Pusztai, Vernon K Sondak, Raquel Aguiar-Ibáñez, Federico Cappuzzo, Christos Chouaid, Chris Elder, Yosuke Hirasawa, Masaru Ishida, Robert Jones, Seung Hyeun Lee, Ryuichi Mizuno, Masayoshi Nagata, David Okonji, Phillip Parente, Bhavesh Shah, Alexander Sun, Dominihemberg Ferreira, Carmel Spiteri, Andrea Lauer, Amrit Kaliasethi, Carol Kao, Smita Kothari, Jan McKendrick","doi":"10.1136/jitc-2024-011184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anti-programmed death (ligand) 1 (anti-PD-(L)1) therapies were first introduced in the metastatic setting and have since been approved and reimbursed for treating early-stage cancers in the adjuvant, perioperative, and neoadjuvant settings in many cancer types. Current evidence supporting anti-PD(L)-1 retreatment after relapse with prior neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant anti-PD(L)1 therapy is limited and inconclusive. There is no guidance for clinicians on how and when to retreat with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies when anti-PD-(L)1 therapy was administered in the neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting. This study aimed to reach consensus on factors to guide decision-making regarding retreatment with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies after prior therapy with an anti-PD-(L)1 agent. This modified Delphi study consisted of a clinician survey across 10 countries followed by three real-time virtual Delphi panels involving clinical experts who had completed the survey. Clinical experts were experienced in using anti-PD-(L)1 treatments in early-stage cancers and/or as retreatment of patients with recurrences following early-stage treatment with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies. Of 28 clinicians providing survey responses, 20 participated in one of three Delphi panels. There was consensus that retreatment can be defined as 'repeated treatment with the same therapeutic class following relapse after or during neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant treatment.' All three panels agreed that decisions around retreatment should consider 'prior immune-related adverse events/toxicity,' 'time-related factors' (eg, time since completion of full treatment course and since discontinuation) and 'previous patient response' (often referred to by clinicians as tumor response, which may have reflected their experience with metastatic disease). Other factors identified as important included country-specific practices, treatment availability, and reimbursement. Generally, the clinical experts considered that retreatment could be considered from ≥3 to 6 months after stopping initial anti-PD-(L)1 treatment, or from ≥6 months after relapse/recurrence. In conclusion, clinicians across different regions recognized a role for retreating patients with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies after initial anti-PD-(L)1 treatment for early-stage cancers. Consensus was reached on some factors to consider regarding whether and when to retreat, although differences in clinical practice between countries/geographical regions made it difficult to achieve consensus for some more nuanced elements of retreatment. Further evidence could help better inform retreatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14820,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","volume":"13 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical factors influencing retreatment with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies after treatment in early-stage cancers: a modified Delphi consensus study.\",\"authors\":\"Lajos Pusztai, Vernon K Sondak, Raquel Aguiar-Ibáñez, Federico Cappuzzo, Christos Chouaid, Chris Elder, Yosuke Hirasawa, Masaru Ishida, Robert Jones, Seung Hyeun Lee, Ryuichi Mizuno, Masayoshi Nagata, David Okonji, Phillip Parente, Bhavesh Shah, Alexander Sun, Dominihemberg Ferreira, Carmel Spiteri, Andrea Lauer, Amrit Kaliasethi, Carol Kao, Smita Kothari, Jan McKendrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jitc-2024-011184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Anti-programmed death (ligand) 1 (anti-PD-(L)1) therapies were first introduced in the metastatic setting and have since been approved and reimbursed for treating early-stage cancers in the adjuvant, perioperative, and neoadjuvant settings in many cancer types. Current evidence supporting anti-PD(L)-1 retreatment after relapse with prior neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant anti-PD(L)1 therapy is limited and inconclusive. There is no guidance for clinicians on how and when to retreat with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies when anti-PD-(L)1 therapy was administered in the neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting. This study aimed to reach consensus on factors to guide decision-making regarding retreatment with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies after prior therapy with an anti-PD-(L)1 agent. This modified Delphi study consisted of a clinician survey across 10 countries followed by three real-time virtual Delphi panels involving clinical experts who had completed the survey. Clinical experts were experienced in using anti-PD-(L)1 treatments in early-stage cancers and/or as retreatment of patients with recurrences following early-stage treatment with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies. Of 28 clinicians providing survey responses, 20 participated in one of three Delphi panels. There was consensus that retreatment can be defined as 'repeated treatment with the same therapeutic class following relapse after or during neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant treatment.' All three panels agreed that decisions around retreatment should consider 'prior immune-related adverse events/toxicity,' 'time-related factors' (eg, time since completion of full treatment course and since discontinuation) and 'previous patient response' (often referred to by clinicians as tumor response, which may have reflected their experience with metastatic disease). Other factors identified as important included country-specific practices, treatment availability, and reimbursement. Generally, the clinical experts considered that retreatment could be considered from ≥3 to 6 months after stopping initial anti-PD-(L)1 treatment, or from ≥6 months after relapse/recurrence. In conclusion, clinicians across different regions recognized a role for retreating patients with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies after initial anti-PD-(L)1 treatment for early-stage cancers. Consensus was reached on some factors to consider regarding whether and when to retreat, although differences in clinical practice between countries/geographical regions made it difficult to achieve consensus for some more nuanced elements of retreatment. Further evidence could help better inform retreatment decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer\",\"volume\":\"13 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-011184\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-011184","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗程序性死亡(配体)1 (anti-PD-(L)1)疗法最初是在转移性癌症中引入的,此后已被批准并报销用于许多癌症类型的辅助治疗、围手术期和新辅助治疗的早期癌症。目前支持复发后用新辅助和/或辅助抗pd (L)1治疗再治疗的证据有限且不确定。当在新辅助和/或辅助环境中使用抗pd -(L)1治疗时,临床医生没有关于如何以及何时退出抗pd -(L)1治疗的指导。本研究旨在就先前使用抗pd -(L)1药物治疗后再使用抗pd -(L)1治疗的决策因素达成共识。这项改进的德尔菲研究包括对10个国家的临床医生进行调查,随后是三个实时虚拟德尔菲小组,其中包括完成调查的临床专家。临床专家在使用抗pd -(L)1治疗早期癌症和/或作为早期抗pd -(L)1治疗后复发患者的再治疗方面经验丰富。在28名提供调查回复的临床医生中,20名参加了三个德尔菲小组中的一个。人们一致认为,再治疗可以定义为“在新辅助和/或辅助治疗后或期间复发后使用相同治疗级别的重复治疗”。所有三个专家组一致认为,围绕再治疗的决定应考虑“既往免疫相关不良事件/毒性”、“时间相关因素”(例如,自完成整个疗程和停止治疗以来的时间)和“既往患者反应”(通常被临床医生称为肿瘤反应,这可能反映了他们对转移性疾病的经历)。其他被确定为重要的因素包括国家具体做法、治疗可得性和报销。通常,临床专家认为在停止初始抗pd -(L)1治疗后≥3 ~ 6个月,或复发/复发后≥6个月,可以考虑再治疗。总之,不同地区的临床医生认识到早期癌症患者在最初的抗pd -(L)1治疗后退回抗pd -(L)1治疗的作用。关于是否撤退和何时撤退的一些考虑因素达成了共识,尽管各国/地理区域之间临床实践的差异使得难以就一些更细微的再治疗因素达成共识。进一步的证据可能有助于更好地为再治疗决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical factors influencing retreatment with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies after treatment in early-stage cancers: a modified Delphi consensus study.

Anti-programmed death (ligand) 1 (anti-PD-(L)1) therapies were first introduced in the metastatic setting and have since been approved and reimbursed for treating early-stage cancers in the adjuvant, perioperative, and neoadjuvant settings in many cancer types. Current evidence supporting anti-PD(L)-1 retreatment after relapse with prior neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant anti-PD(L)1 therapy is limited and inconclusive. There is no guidance for clinicians on how and when to retreat with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies when anti-PD-(L)1 therapy was administered in the neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting. This study aimed to reach consensus on factors to guide decision-making regarding retreatment with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies after prior therapy with an anti-PD-(L)1 agent. This modified Delphi study consisted of a clinician survey across 10 countries followed by three real-time virtual Delphi panels involving clinical experts who had completed the survey. Clinical experts were experienced in using anti-PD-(L)1 treatments in early-stage cancers and/or as retreatment of patients with recurrences following early-stage treatment with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies. Of 28 clinicians providing survey responses, 20 participated in one of three Delphi panels. There was consensus that retreatment can be defined as 'repeated treatment with the same therapeutic class following relapse after or during neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant treatment.' All three panels agreed that decisions around retreatment should consider 'prior immune-related adverse events/toxicity,' 'time-related factors' (eg, time since completion of full treatment course and since discontinuation) and 'previous patient response' (often referred to by clinicians as tumor response, which may have reflected their experience with metastatic disease). Other factors identified as important included country-specific practices, treatment availability, and reimbursement. Generally, the clinical experts considered that retreatment could be considered from ≥3 to 6 months after stopping initial anti-PD-(L)1 treatment, or from ≥6 months after relapse/recurrence. In conclusion, clinicians across different regions recognized a role for retreating patients with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies after initial anti-PD-(L)1 treatment for early-stage cancers. Consensus was reached on some factors to consider regarding whether and when to retreat, although differences in clinical practice between countries/geographical regions made it difficult to achieve consensus for some more nuanced elements of retreatment. Further evidence could help better inform retreatment decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
4.60%
发文量
522
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (JITC) is a peer-reviewed publication that promotes scientific exchange and deepens knowledge in the constantly evolving fields of tumor immunology and cancer immunotherapy. With an open access format, JITC encourages widespread access to its findings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, spanning from basic science to translational and clinical research. Key areas of interest include tumor-host interactions, the intricate tumor microenvironment, animal models, the identification of predictive and prognostic immune biomarkers, groundbreaking pharmaceutical and cellular therapies, innovative vaccines, combination immune-based treatments, and the study of immune-related toxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信