{"title":"髋部骨折后限制性输血的最佳阈值的再探索:一个多中心前瞻性队列。","authors":"Dajun Jiang, Mao Wei, Sen Lin, Jiaqing Cao, Yuquan Bian, Shizan He, Xiaolin Li, Jinshan Zhang, Limin Zhao, Changqing Zhang, Weitao Jia, Hongyi Zhu","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Restrictive transfusion is recommended in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. However, the evidence regarding the optimal threshold for transfusion remained uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter prospective cohort, we enrolled participants who received surgical treatment of a hip fracture and were aged 65 years or older from 2017 to 2023. The restrictive transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) with a threshold at hemoglobin level <8 g/dl was the standard of care during the study period. When periodic shortage of blood existed, the threshold was adjusted to <7 g/dl as a priori-defined coping strategy. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within one year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 3516 and 732 patients received standard care (threshold at hemoglobin level <8 g/dl) and alternative care (threshold at hemoglobin level <7 g/dl), respectively. Patients in alternative care group had a similar incidence of death within one year compared with patients in standard care group (157 [17.6%] patients versus 575 [17.1%] patients), with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85 to 1.21, P = 0 · 885). For subgroup analysis of patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) at baseline, death occurred in 53 (27.5%) patients of alternative care group and 182 (19.9%) of standard care group, with an adjusted HR of 1.45 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.99, P = 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients without baseline CVD, adjusting the threshold for transfusion from the standard level (hemoglobin level <8 g/dl) to an alternative level (<7 g/dl) might be a safe practice in coping periodic blood shortage. In patients with baseline CVD, standard threshold remained recommended. Future randomized clinical trials were warranted by the current study.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-exploration of the optimal threshold for restrictive transfusion after hip fracture: a multicenter prospective Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Dajun Jiang, Mao Wei, Sen Lin, Jiaqing Cao, Yuquan Bian, Shizan He, Xiaolin Li, Jinshan Zhang, Limin Zhao, Changqing Zhang, Weitao Jia, Hongyi Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Restrictive transfusion is recommended in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. However, the evidence regarding the optimal threshold for transfusion remained uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter prospective cohort, we enrolled participants who received surgical treatment of a hip fracture and were aged 65 years or older from 2017 to 2023. The restrictive transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) with a threshold at hemoglobin level <8 g/dl was the standard of care during the study period. When periodic shortage of blood existed, the threshold was adjusted to <7 g/dl as a priori-defined coping strategy. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within one year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 3516 and 732 patients received standard care (threshold at hemoglobin level <8 g/dl) and alternative care (threshold at hemoglobin level <7 g/dl), respectively. Patients in alternative care group had a similar incidence of death within one year compared with patients in standard care group (157 [17.6%] patients versus 575 [17.1%] patients), with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85 to 1.21, P = 0 · 885). For subgroup analysis of patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) at baseline, death occurred in 53 (27.5%) patients of alternative care group and 182 (19.9%) of standard care group, with an adjusted HR of 1.45 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.99, P = 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients without baseline CVD, adjusting the threshold for transfusion from the standard level (hemoglobin level <8 g/dl) to an alternative level (<7 g/dl) might be a safe practice in coping periodic blood shortage. In patients with baseline CVD, standard threshold remained recommended. Future randomized clinical trials were warranted by the current study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002599\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002599","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Re-exploration of the optimal threshold for restrictive transfusion after hip fracture: a multicenter prospective Cohort.
Background: Restrictive transfusion is recommended in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. However, the evidence regarding the optimal threshold for transfusion remained uncertain.
Methods: In this multicenter prospective cohort, we enrolled participants who received surgical treatment of a hip fracture and were aged 65 years or older from 2017 to 2023. The restrictive transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) with a threshold at hemoglobin level <8 g/dl was the standard of care during the study period. When periodic shortage of blood existed, the threshold was adjusted to <7 g/dl as a priori-defined coping strategy. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within one year after surgery.
Results: In this study, 3516 and 732 patients received standard care (threshold at hemoglobin level <8 g/dl) and alternative care (threshold at hemoglobin level <7 g/dl), respectively. Patients in alternative care group had a similar incidence of death within one year compared with patients in standard care group (157 [17.6%] patients versus 575 [17.1%] patients), with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85 to 1.21, P = 0 · 885). For subgroup analysis of patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) at baseline, death occurred in 53 (27.5%) patients of alternative care group and 182 (19.9%) of standard care group, with an adjusted HR of 1.45 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.99, P = 0.023).
Conclusion: In patients without baseline CVD, adjusting the threshold for transfusion from the standard level (hemoglobin level <8 g/dl) to an alternative level (<7 g/dl) might be a safe practice in coping periodic blood shortage. In patients with baseline CVD, standard threshold remained recommended. Future randomized clinical trials were warranted by the current study.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.