髋部骨折后限制性输血的最佳阈值的再探索:一个多中心前瞻性队列。

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Dajun Jiang, Mao Wei, Sen Lin, Jiaqing Cao, Yuquan Bian, Shizan He, Xiaolin Li, Jinshan Zhang, Limin Zhao, Changqing Zhang, Weitao Jia, Hongyi Zhu
{"title":"髋部骨折后限制性输血的最佳阈值的再探索:一个多中心前瞻性队列。","authors":"Dajun Jiang, Mao Wei, Sen Lin, Jiaqing Cao, Yuquan Bian, Shizan He, Xiaolin Li, Jinshan Zhang, Limin Zhao, Changqing Zhang, Weitao Jia, Hongyi Zhu","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Restrictive transfusion is recommended in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. However, the evidence regarding the optimal threshold for transfusion remained uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter prospective cohort, we enrolled participants who received surgical treatment of a hip fracture and were aged 65 years or older from 2017 to 2023. The restrictive transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) with a threshold at hemoglobin level <8 g/dl was the standard of care during the study period. When periodic shortage of blood existed, the threshold was adjusted to <7 g/dl as a priori-defined coping strategy. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within one year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 3516 and 732 patients received standard care (threshold at hemoglobin level <8 g/dl) and alternative care (threshold at hemoglobin level <7 g/dl), respectively. Patients in alternative care group had a similar incidence of death within one year compared with patients in standard care group (157 [17.6%] patients versus 575 [17.1%] patients), with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85 to 1.21, P = 0 · 885). For subgroup analysis of patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) at baseline, death occurred in 53 (27.5%) patients of alternative care group and 182 (19.9%) of standard care group, with an adjusted HR of 1.45 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.99, P = 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients without baseline CVD, adjusting the threshold for transfusion from the standard level (hemoglobin level <8 g/dl) to an alternative level (<7 g/dl) might be a safe practice in coping periodic blood shortage. In patients with baseline CVD, standard threshold remained recommended. Future randomized clinical trials were warranted by the current study.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-exploration of the optimal threshold for restrictive transfusion after hip fracture: a multicenter prospective Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Dajun Jiang, Mao Wei, Sen Lin, Jiaqing Cao, Yuquan Bian, Shizan He, Xiaolin Li, Jinshan Zhang, Limin Zhao, Changqing Zhang, Weitao Jia, Hongyi Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Restrictive transfusion is recommended in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. However, the evidence regarding the optimal threshold for transfusion remained uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter prospective cohort, we enrolled participants who received surgical treatment of a hip fracture and were aged 65 years or older from 2017 to 2023. The restrictive transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) with a threshold at hemoglobin level <8 g/dl was the standard of care during the study period. When periodic shortage of blood existed, the threshold was adjusted to <7 g/dl as a priori-defined coping strategy. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within one year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 3516 and 732 patients received standard care (threshold at hemoglobin level <8 g/dl) and alternative care (threshold at hemoglobin level <7 g/dl), respectively. Patients in alternative care group had a similar incidence of death within one year compared with patients in standard care group (157 [17.6%] patients versus 575 [17.1%] patients), with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85 to 1.21, P = 0 · 885). For subgroup analysis of patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) at baseline, death occurred in 53 (27.5%) patients of alternative care group and 182 (19.9%) of standard care group, with an adjusted HR of 1.45 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.99, P = 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients without baseline CVD, adjusting the threshold for transfusion from the standard level (hemoglobin level <8 g/dl) to an alternative level (<7 g/dl) might be a safe practice in coping periodic blood shortage. In patients with baseline CVD, standard threshold remained recommended. Future randomized clinical trials were warranted by the current study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002599\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002599","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在髋部骨折手术患者中推荐限制性输血。然而,关于输血的最佳阈值的证据仍然不确定。方法:在这个多中心前瞻性队列中,我们招募了2017年至2023年期间接受髋部骨折手术治疗且年龄在65岁及以上的参与者。结果:在本研究中,3516例和732例患者接受了标准治疗(血红蛋白水平阈值)结论:在没有基线CVD的患者中,从标准水平(血红蛋白水平)调整输血阈值
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-exploration of the optimal threshold for restrictive transfusion after hip fracture: a multicenter prospective Cohort.

Background: Restrictive transfusion is recommended in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. However, the evidence regarding the optimal threshold for transfusion remained uncertain.

Methods: In this multicenter prospective cohort, we enrolled participants who received surgical treatment of a hip fracture and were aged 65 years or older from 2017 to 2023. The restrictive transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) with a threshold at hemoglobin level <8 g/dl was the standard of care during the study period. When periodic shortage of blood existed, the threshold was adjusted to <7 g/dl as a priori-defined coping strategy. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within one year after surgery.

Results: In this study, 3516 and 732 patients received standard care (threshold at hemoglobin level <8 g/dl) and alternative care (threshold at hemoglobin level <7 g/dl), respectively. Patients in alternative care group had a similar incidence of death within one year compared with patients in standard care group (157 [17.6%] patients versus 575 [17.1%] patients), with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85 to 1.21, P = 0 · 885). For subgroup analysis of patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) at baseline, death occurred in 53 (27.5%) patients of alternative care group and 182 (19.9%) of standard care group, with an adjusted HR of 1.45 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.99, P = 0.023).

Conclusion: In patients without baseline CVD, adjusting the threshold for transfusion from the standard level (hemoglobin level <8 g/dl) to an alternative level (<7 g/dl) might be a safe practice in coping periodic blood shortage. In patients with baseline CVD, standard threshold remained recommended. Future randomized clinical trials were warranted by the current study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信