Daphne Remulla, Kimberly S Miles, Alvaro Carvalho, Sara M Maskal, W Scott Butsch, Lucas R Beffa, Clayton C Petro, David M Krpata, Ajita S Prabhu, Michael J Rosen, Benjamin T Miller
{"title":"开放式腹壁重建术前减重:随机对照试验的研究方案。","authors":"Daphne Remulla, Kimberly S Miles, Alvaro Carvalho, Sara M Maskal, W Scott Butsch, Lucas R Beffa, Clayton C Petro, David M Krpata, Ajita S Prabhu, Michael J Rosen, Benjamin T Miller","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03375-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity is widely recognized as a risk factor for poor outcomes following ventral hernia repair. This belief has led many surgeons to implement arbitrary body mass index (BMI) cutoffs, typically 35-40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, before offering elective hernia repair. These practices are based on low-quality evidence and create significant challenges for patients with symptomatic hernias who lack access to metabolic and bariatric surgery or obesity medications. We aim to compare medical weight loss followed by surgery versus upfront surgery in patients with severe obesity undergoing ventral hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a registry-based, parallel, randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation. A total of 258 patients with a BMI 40-55 kg/m<sup>2</sup> who are planning to undergo open retromuscular ventral hernia repair are randomized to a six-month preoperative medical weight loss program followed by surgery or upfront surgery. The medical weight loss program is conducted by a nurse practitioner trained in obesity medicine. The primary hypothesis is that abdominal wall-specific quality of life, as measured by Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey (HerQLes) summary scores at one year, for the upfront abdominal wall reconstruction intervention will be non-inferior compared to a preoperative medical weight loss program followed by surgery. Secondary outcomes include hernia recurrence rates at one-year, wound morbidity at 30 days and one year, and rates of emergency hernia repair, readmissions, complications, and reoperations between groups. Patient-reported outcomes include quality of life and pain scores at baseline, 30 days, and after completing the standard medical weight loss program. Weight-related outcomes include changes in weight from enrollment through one-year follow-up, rate of achievement of weight loss goals, and the association of weight loss and program completion on postoperative outcomes. Lastly, we will evaluate cost-effectiveness using quality-adjusted life years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Preoperative weight loss offers potential benefits for patients with obesity undergoing hernia repair including decreased wound morbidity, reduced technical difficulty, and potentially lower recurrence rates. However, disadvantages include prolonged diminished quality of life, risk of emergent hernia repair during the weight loss period, limited access to effective weight loss interventions, and challenges with adherence to weight loss protocols and long-term weight maintenance. This randomized controlled trial will provide high-quality evidence on whether intensive preoperative medical weight loss improves outcomes compared to immediate surgical repair in patients with severe obesity, helping to establish evidence-based guidelines for this challenging patient population.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05925959 (registered June 22, 2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative weight loss for open abdominal wall reconstruction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Daphne Remulla, Kimberly S Miles, Alvaro Carvalho, Sara M Maskal, W Scott Butsch, Lucas R Beffa, Clayton C Petro, David M Krpata, Ajita S Prabhu, Michael J Rosen, Benjamin T Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10029-025-03375-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity is widely recognized as a risk factor for poor outcomes following ventral hernia repair. This belief has led many surgeons to implement arbitrary body mass index (BMI) cutoffs, typically 35-40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, before offering elective hernia repair. These practices are based on low-quality evidence and create significant challenges for patients with symptomatic hernias who lack access to metabolic and bariatric surgery or obesity medications. We aim to compare medical weight loss followed by surgery versus upfront surgery in patients with severe obesity undergoing ventral hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a registry-based, parallel, randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation. A total of 258 patients with a BMI 40-55 kg/m<sup>2</sup> who are planning to undergo open retromuscular ventral hernia repair are randomized to a six-month preoperative medical weight loss program followed by surgery or upfront surgery. The medical weight loss program is conducted by a nurse practitioner trained in obesity medicine. The primary hypothesis is that abdominal wall-specific quality of life, as measured by Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey (HerQLes) summary scores at one year, for the upfront abdominal wall reconstruction intervention will be non-inferior compared to a preoperative medical weight loss program followed by surgery. Secondary outcomes include hernia recurrence rates at one-year, wound morbidity at 30 days and one year, and rates of emergency hernia repair, readmissions, complications, and reoperations between groups. Patient-reported outcomes include quality of life and pain scores at baseline, 30 days, and after completing the standard medical weight loss program. Weight-related outcomes include changes in weight from enrollment through one-year follow-up, rate of achievement of weight loss goals, and the association of weight loss and program completion on postoperative outcomes. Lastly, we will evaluate cost-effectiveness using quality-adjusted life years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Preoperative weight loss offers potential benefits for patients with obesity undergoing hernia repair including decreased wound morbidity, reduced technical difficulty, and potentially lower recurrence rates. However, disadvantages include prolonged diminished quality of life, risk of emergent hernia repair during the weight loss period, limited access to effective weight loss interventions, and challenges with adherence to weight loss protocols and long-term weight maintenance. This randomized controlled trial will provide high-quality evidence on whether intensive preoperative medical weight loss improves outcomes compared to immediate surgical repair in patients with severe obesity, helping to establish evidence-based guidelines for this challenging patient population.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05925959 (registered June 22, 2023).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hernia\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hernia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03375-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03375-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Preoperative weight loss for open abdominal wall reconstruction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Background: Obesity is widely recognized as a risk factor for poor outcomes following ventral hernia repair. This belief has led many surgeons to implement arbitrary body mass index (BMI) cutoffs, typically 35-40 kg/m2, before offering elective hernia repair. These practices are based on low-quality evidence and create significant challenges for patients with symptomatic hernias who lack access to metabolic and bariatric surgery or obesity medications. We aim to compare medical weight loss followed by surgery versus upfront surgery in patients with severe obesity undergoing ventral hernia repair.
Methods: This is a registry-based, parallel, randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation. A total of 258 patients with a BMI 40-55 kg/m2 who are planning to undergo open retromuscular ventral hernia repair are randomized to a six-month preoperative medical weight loss program followed by surgery or upfront surgery. The medical weight loss program is conducted by a nurse practitioner trained in obesity medicine. The primary hypothesis is that abdominal wall-specific quality of life, as measured by Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey (HerQLes) summary scores at one year, for the upfront abdominal wall reconstruction intervention will be non-inferior compared to a preoperative medical weight loss program followed by surgery. Secondary outcomes include hernia recurrence rates at one-year, wound morbidity at 30 days and one year, and rates of emergency hernia repair, readmissions, complications, and reoperations between groups. Patient-reported outcomes include quality of life and pain scores at baseline, 30 days, and after completing the standard medical weight loss program. Weight-related outcomes include changes in weight from enrollment through one-year follow-up, rate of achievement of weight loss goals, and the association of weight loss and program completion on postoperative outcomes. Lastly, we will evaluate cost-effectiveness using quality-adjusted life years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.
Discussion: Preoperative weight loss offers potential benefits for patients with obesity undergoing hernia repair including decreased wound morbidity, reduced technical difficulty, and potentially lower recurrence rates. However, disadvantages include prolonged diminished quality of life, risk of emergent hernia repair during the weight loss period, limited access to effective weight loss interventions, and challenges with adherence to weight loss protocols and long-term weight maintenance. This randomized controlled trial will provide high-quality evidence on whether intensive preoperative medical weight loss improves outcomes compared to immediate surgical repair in patients with severe obesity, helping to establish evidence-based guidelines for this challenging patient population.
Trial registration: NCT05925959 (registered June 22, 2023).
期刊介绍:
Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery.
Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.