加拿大森林的闪电点火效率。

IF 3.6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Fire Ecology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-26 DOI:10.1186/s42408-025-00376-1
Sean C P Coogan, Alex J Cannon, Mike D Flannigan
{"title":"加拿大森林的闪电点火效率。","authors":"Sean C P Coogan, Alex J Cannon, Mike D Flannigan","doi":"10.1186/s42408-025-00376-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lightning-caused fires have a driving influence on Canadian forests, being responsible for approximately half of all wildfires and 90% of the area burned. We created a climatology (2000-2020) of daily lightning efficiency (i.e., the ratio of cloud-to-ground lightning flashes to lightning-caused wildfires that occurred) over the meteorological summer for four ecozones and a subset of British Columbia (BC) ecoprovinces. We estimated lightning efficiency using data from the Canadian Lightning Detection Network and the Canadian National Fire Database. We used the ERA5 reanalysis as inputs for fuel moisture variables (i.e., Fine Fuel Moisture Code (FFMC), Duff Moisture Code (DMC), and Drought Code (DC)) from the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index (FWI) System, as well as variables relating to the amount of precipitation and lightning flashes. We examined relationships between lightning efficiency, day-of-year, and the above variables using a combination of linear models, Spearman's correlations, and Random Forest (RF) regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lightning efficiency increased non-linearly (i.e., quadratic) over the summer in the Montane Cordillera Ecozone, and decreased linearly in the Boreal Plains and Boreal Shield West. Lightning efficiency in the Boreal Shield East showed a slight decline over the summer; however, this model was not significant. DMC and DC were more strongly correlated with lightning efficiency than FFMC in most zones. We ran RF regression both with and without DC (because of multicollinearity with day-of-year), and day-of-year, DMC, and DC (when present) were the most important variables for all ecozones, while results were more variable for the ecoprovinces.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lightning efficiency, and, thus, the probability of a lightning strike igniting a wildfire, changes over the summer and varies by region. Therefore, models predicting lightning-caused fire occurrence, or other similar applications involving lightning ignition, may benefit by accounting for seasonal lightning efficiency in addition to the traditional fuel moisture variables. Our work is generally consistent with findings from more localized studies relating to lightning-caused fires.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42408-025-00376-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":12273,"journal":{"name":"Fire Ecology","volume":"21 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12104117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lightning ignition efficiency in Canadian forests.\",\"authors\":\"Sean C P Coogan, Alex J Cannon, Mike D Flannigan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42408-025-00376-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lightning-caused fires have a driving influence on Canadian forests, being responsible for approximately half of all wildfires and 90% of the area burned. We created a climatology (2000-2020) of daily lightning efficiency (i.e., the ratio of cloud-to-ground lightning flashes to lightning-caused wildfires that occurred) over the meteorological summer for four ecozones and a subset of British Columbia (BC) ecoprovinces. We estimated lightning efficiency using data from the Canadian Lightning Detection Network and the Canadian National Fire Database. We used the ERA5 reanalysis as inputs for fuel moisture variables (i.e., Fine Fuel Moisture Code (FFMC), Duff Moisture Code (DMC), and Drought Code (DC)) from the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index (FWI) System, as well as variables relating to the amount of precipitation and lightning flashes. We examined relationships between lightning efficiency, day-of-year, and the above variables using a combination of linear models, Spearman's correlations, and Random Forest (RF) regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lightning efficiency increased non-linearly (i.e., quadratic) over the summer in the Montane Cordillera Ecozone, and decreased linearly in the Boreal Plains and Boreal Shield West. Lightning efficiency in the Boreal Shield East showed a slight decline over the summer; however, this model was not significant. DMC and DC were more strongly correlated with lightning efficiency than FFMC in most zones. We ran RF regression both with and without DC (because of multicollinearity with day-of-year), and day-of-year, DMC, and DC (when present) were the most important variables for all ecozones, while results were more variable for the ecoprovinces.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lightning efficiency, and, thus, the probability of a lightning strike igniting a wildfire, changes over the summer and varies by region. Therefore, models predicting lightning-caused fire occurrence, or other similar applications involving lightning ignition, may benefit by accounting for seasonal lightning efficiency in addition to the traditional fuel moisture variables. Our work is generally consistent with findings from more localized studies relating to lightning-caused fires.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42408-025-00376-1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fire Ecology\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12104117/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fire Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-025-00376-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-025-00376-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:闪电引起的火灾对加拿大的森林有很大的影响,大约一半的野火和90%的烧毁面积都是由闪电引起的。我们创建了一个气象夏季(2000-2020年)的每日闪电效率气候学(即云对地闪电与发生的闪电引起的野火的比率),涵盖了四个生态区和不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)的一个子集。我们使用来自加拿大闪电探测网络和加拿大国家火灾数据库的数据来估计闪电效率。我们使用ERA5再分析作为来自加拿大森林火灾天气指数(FWI)系统的燃料水分变量(即Fine fuel moisture Code (FFMC), Duff moisture Code (DMC)和Drought Code (DC))的输入,以及与降水和闪电量相关的变量。我们使用线性模型、Spearman相关和随机森林(RF)回归相结合的方法检验了闪电效率、一年中的一天和上述变量之间的关系。结果:夏季山地科迪勒拉生态区闪电效率呈非线性(即二次型)增长,北方平原和北方盾西部地区闪电效率呈线性下降。北极盾东部的闪电效率在夏季略有下降;然而,这个模型并不显著。在大部分地区,DMC和DC与闪电效率的相关性强于FFMC。我们在有DC和没有DC的情况下(由于与年份的多重共线性)进行了RF回归,并且对于所有生态区来说,年份、DMC和DC(当存在时)是最重要的变量,而对于生态省来说,结果更加可变。结论:闪电效率,以及雷击引发野火的概率,在整个夏季都在变化,并因地区而异。因此,预测闪电引起的火灾发生的模型,或其他涉及闪电点火的类似应用,除了考虑传统的燃料湿度变量外,还可以考虑季节性闪电效率。我们的工作大体上与更局部的有关闪电引起火灾的研究结果一致。补充资料:在线版本包含补充资料,网址为10.1186/s42408-025-00376-1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lightning ignition efficiency in Canadian forests.

Background: Lightning-caused fires have a driving influence on Canadian forests, being responsible for approximately half of all wildfires and 90% of the area burned. We created a climatology (2000-2020) of daily lightning efficiency (i.e., the ratio of cloud-to-ground lightning flashes to lightning-caused wildfires that occurred) over the meteorological summer for four ecozones and a subset of British Columbia (BC) ecoprovinces. We estimated lightning efficiency using data from the Canadian Lightning Detection Network and the Canadian National Fire Database. We used the ERA5 reanalysis as inputs for fuel moisture variables (i.e., Fine Fuel Moisture Code (FFMC), Duff Moisture Code (DMC), and Drought Code (DC)) from the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index (FWI) System, as well as variables relating to the amount of precipitation and lightning flashes. We examined relationships between lightning efficiency, day-of-year, and the above variables using a combination of linear models, Spearman's correlations, and Random Forest (RF) regression.

Results: Lightning efficiency increased non-linearly (i.e., quadratic) over the summer in the Montane Cordillera Ecozone, and decreased linearly in the Boreal Plains and Boreal Shield West. Lightning efficiency in the Boreal Shield East showed a slight decline over the summer; however, this model was not significant. DMC and DC were more strongly correlated with lightning efficiency than FFMC in most zones. We ran RF regression both with and without DC (because of multicollinearity with day-of-year), and day-of-year, DMC, and DC (when present) were the most important variables for all ecozones, while results were more variable for the ecoprovinces.

Conclusions: Lightning efficiency, and, thus, the probability of a lightning strike igniting a wildfire, changes over the summer and varies by region. Therefore, models predicting lightning-caused fire occurrence, or other similar applications involving lightning ignition, may benefit by accounting for seasonal lightning efficiency in addition to the traditional fuel moisture variables. Our work is generally consistent with findings from more localized studies relating to lightning-caused fires.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42408-025-00376-1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fire Ecology
Fire Ecology ECOLOGY-FORESTRY
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
24
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Fire Ecology is the international scientific journal supported by the Association for Fire Ecology. Fire Ecology publishes peer-reviewed articles on all ecological and management aspects relating to wildland fire. We welcome submissions on topics that include a broad range of research on the ecological relationships of fire to its environment, including, but not limited to: Ecology (physical and biological fire effects, fire regimes, etc.) Social science (geography, sociology, anthropology, etc.) Fuel Fire science and modeling Planning and risk management Law and policy Fire management Inter- or cross-disciplinary fire-related topics Technology transfer products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信