伏隔核多巴胺编码食欲巴甫洛夫条件反射的追踪期。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
eNeuro Pub Date : 2025-05-27 Print Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0016-25.2025
Matthew J Wanat, Brandon I Garcia-Castañeda, Cecilia Alducin-Martinez, Leonor G Cedillo, Erika T Camacho, Paul E M Phillips
{"title":"伏隔核多巴胺编码食欲巴甫洛夫条件反射的追踪期。","authors":"Matthew J Wanat, Brandon I Garcia-Castañeda, Cecilia Alducin-Martinez, Leonor G Cedillo, Erika T Camacho, Paul E M Phillips","doi":"10.1523/ENEURO.0016-25.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pavlovian conditioning tasks have been used to identify the neural systems involved with learning cue-outcome relationships. In delay conditioning, the conditioned stimulus (CS) overlaps or co-terminates with the unconditioned stimulus (US). Prior studies demonstrate that dopamine in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) regulates behavioral responding during delay conditioning. Furthermore, the dopamine response to the CS reflects the relative value of the upcoming reward in these tasks. In contrast to delay conditioning, trace conditioning involves a \"trace\" period separating the end of the CS and the US delivery. While dopamine has been implicated in trace conditioning, no studies have examined how NAc dopamine responds to reward-related stimuli in these tasks. Here, we developed a within-subject trace conditioning task where distinct CSs signaled either a short trace period (5 s) or a long trace period (55 s) prior to food reward delivery. Male rats exhibited greater conditioned responding and a faster response latency to the Short Trace CS relative to the Long Trace CS. Voltammetry recordings in the NAc found that the CS-evoked dopamine response increased on Short Trace trials but decreased on Long Trace trials. Conversely, US-evoked dopamine responses were greater on Long Trace trials relative to Short Trace trials. The CS dopamine response correlated with the response latency and not with conditioned responding. Furthermore, the relationship between CS dopamine and latency was best explained by an exponential function. Our results collectively illustrate that the trace period is encoded by the bidirectional NAc dopamine response to the CS during pavlovian conditioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":11617,"journal":{"name":"eNeuro","volume":"12 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12113932/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nucleus Accumbens Dopamine Encodes the Trace Period during Appetitive Pavlovian Conditioning.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew J Wanat, Brandon I Garcia-Castañeda, Cecilia Alducin-Martinez, Leonor G Cedillo, Erika T Camacho, Paul E M Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.1523/ENEURO.0016-25.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pavlovian conditioning tasks have been used to identify the neural systems involved with learning cue-outcome relationships. In delay conditioning, the conditioned stimulus (CS) overlaps or co-terminates with the unconditioned stimulus (US). Prior studies demonstrate that dopamine in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) regulates behavioral responding during delay conditioning. Furthermore, the dopamine response to the CS reflects the relative value of the upcoming reward in these tasks. In contrast to delay conditioning, trace conditioning involves a \\\"trace\\\" period separating the end of the CS and the US delivery. While dopamine has been implicated in trace conditioning, no studies have examined how NAc dopamine responds to reward-related stimuli in these tasks. Here, we developed a within-subject trace conditioning task where distinct CSs signaled either a short trace period (5 s) or a long trace period (55 s) prior to food reward delivery. Male rats exhibited greater conditioned responding and a faster response latency to the Short Trace CS relative to the Long Trace CS. Voltammetry recordings in the NAc found that the CS-evoked dopamine response increased on Short Trace trials but decreased on Long Trace trials. Conversely, US-evoked dopamine responses were greater on Long Trace trials relative to Short Trace trials. The CS dopamine response correlated with the response latency and not with conditioned responding. Furthermore, the relationship between CS dopamine and latency was best explained by an exponential function. Our results collectively illustrate that the trace period is encoded by the bidirectional NAc dopamine response to the CS during pavlovian conditioning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eNeuro\",\"volume\":\"12 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12113932/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eNeuro\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0016-25.2025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eNeuro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0016-25.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

巴甫洛夫条件反射任务已被用于识别与学习线索-结果关系有关的神经系统。在延迟条件反射中,条件刺激(CS)与非条件刺激(US)重叠或共终止。先前的研究表明,伏隔核(NAc)中的多巴胺调节延迟条件反射过程中的行为反应。此外,多巴胺对CS的反应反映了这些任务中即将到来的奖励的相对价值。与延迟条件反射相反,跟踪条件反射涉及将CS结束和美国交付分开的“跟踪”时期。虽然多巴胺与微量条件反射有关,但没有研究调查这些任务中NAc多巴胺对奖励相关刺激的反应。在这里,我们开发了一个受试者内部跟踪条件反射任务,其中不同的CSs在食物奖励交付之前发出短跟踪周期(5秒)或长跟踪周期(55秒)的信号。雄性大鼠对短径刺激比长径刺激表现出更强的条件反应和更快的反应潜伏期。NAc的伏安记录发现,cs诱发的多巴胺反应在短径试验中增加,而在长径试验中减少。相反,美国诱发的多巴胺反应在长跟踪试验中比在短跟踪试验中更大。大脑皮层多巴胺反应与反应潜伏期相关,而与条件反应无关。此外,CS多巴胺与潜伏期之间的关系最好用指数函数来解释。我们的研究结果共同表明,在巴甫洛夫条件反射过程中,追踪期是由双向NAc多巴胺对CS的反应编码的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nucleus Accumbens Dopamine Encodes the Trace Period during Appetitive Pavlovian Conditioning.

Pavlovian conditioning tasks have been used to identify the neural systems involved with learning cue-outcome relationships. In delay conditioning, the conditioned stimulus (CS) overlaps or co-terminates with the unconditioned stimulus (US). Prior studies demonstrate that dopamine in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) regulates behavioral responding during delay conditioning. Furthermore, the dopamine response to the CS reflects the relative value of the upcoming reward in these tasks. In contrast to delay conditioning, trace conditioning involves a "trace" period separating the end of the CS and the US delivery. While dopamine has been implicated in trace conditioning, no studies have examined how NAc dopamine responds to reward-related stimuli in these tasks. Here, we developed a within-subject trace conditioning task where distinct CSs signaled either a short trace period (5 s) or a long trace period (55 s) prior to food reward delivery. Male rats exhibited greater conditioned responding and a faster response latency to the Short Trace CS relative to the Long Trace CS. Voltammetry recordings in the NAc found that the CS-evoked dopamine response increased on Short Trace trials but decreased on Long Trace trials. Conversely, US-evoked dopamine responses were greater on Long Trace trials relative to Short Trace trials. The CS dopamine response correlated with the response latency and not with conditioned responding. Furthermore, the relationship between CS dopamine and latency was best explained by an exponential function. Our results collectively illustrate that the trace period is encoded by the bidirectional NAc dopamine response to the CS during pavlovian conditioning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
eNeuro
eNeuro Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
486
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An open-access journal from the Society for Neuroscience, eNeuro publishes high-quality, broad-based, peer-reviewed research focused solely on the field of neuroscience. eNeuro embodies an emerging scientific vision that offers a new experience for authors and readers, all in support of the Society’s mission to advance understanding of the brain and nervous system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信