使用携带刺突蛋白的假型病毒的SARS-CoV-2组粒变异的宿主易感性和进入过程

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Alexandria Zabiegala, Yunjeong Kim, Kyeong-Ok Chang
{"title":"使用携带刺突蛋白的假型病毒的SARS-CoV-2组粒变异的宿主易感性和进入过程","authors":"Alexandria Zabiegala, Yunjeong Kim, Kyeong-Ok Chang","doi":"10.1186/s12917-025-04822-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The zoonotic potential has been well studied for SARS-CoV-2 and its earlier variants, but the information for Omicron variants and SARS-CoV is lacking. In this study, we generated lentivirus-based pseudoviruses carrying spike protein (S) of SARS-CoV-2, parental and Omicron variants including BA.1.1, BA.4/5, XBB.1 and JN.1 to assess the entry into cells expressing human or animal ACE2 including dogs, cats and white-tailed deer. Using these pseudoviruses, along with pseudoviruses carrying S of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV, we assessed the protease processing of these various S through western blotting, entry/inhibition assays, and fusion assays. The results showed that overall, pseudotyped viruses carrying each S of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron strains efficiently entered cells expressing human or animal ACE2 comparably (BA.1.1 and JN.1) or better (BA.4/5 and XBB.1) than those with parental strain. In addition, the entries of pseudotyped viruses carrying S of SARS-CoV were also efficient the cells expressing human or animal ACE2. The presence of TMPRSS2 significantly increased the entry of all tested pseudoviruses including those with S of MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, with BA.1.1, JN1, and XBB.1 Omicron having the largest fold increase. When cathepsin inhibitors were examined to assess their inhibitory effects on entry of parental and Omicron variants, they were significantly less effective in the entry of Omicron variants compared to parent strain, suggesting Omicron strains do not depend on the endosomal route compared to parental strain.</p>","PeriodicalId":9041,"journal":{"name":"BMC Veterinary Research","volume":"21 1","pages":"377"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12108000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Host susceptibilities and entry processes of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants using pseudotyped viruses carrying spike protein.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandria Zabiegala, Yunjeong Kim, Kyeong-Ok Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12917-025-04822-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The zoonotic potential has been well studied for SARS-CoV-2 and its earlier variants, but the information for Omicron variants and SARS-CoV is lacking. In this study, we generated lentivirus-based pseudoviruses carrying spike protein (S) of SARS-CoV-2, parental and Omicron variants including BA.1.1, BA.4/5, XBB.1 and JN.1 to assess the entry into cells expressing human or animal ACE2 including dogs, cats and white-tailed deer. Using these pseudoviruses, along with pseudoviruses carrying S of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV, we assessed the protease processing of these various S through western blotting, entry/inhibition assays, and fusion assays. The results showed that overall, pseudotyped viruses carrying each S of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron strains efficiently entered cells expressing human or animal ACE2 comparably (BA.1.1 and JN.1) or better (BA.4/5 and XBB.1) than those with parental strain. In addition, the entries of pseudotyped viruses carrying S of SARS-CoV were also efficient the cells expressing human or animal ACE2. The presence of TMPRSS2 significantly increased the entry of all tested pseudoviruses including those with S of MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, with BA.1.1, JN1, and XBB.1 Omicron having the largest fold increase. When cathepsin inhibitors were examined to assess their inhibitory effects on entry of parental and Omicron variants, they were significantly less effective in the entry of Omicron variants compared to parent strain, suggesting Omicron strains do not depend on the endosomal route compared to parental strain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Veterinary Research\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12108000/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Veterinary Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04822-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04822-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

SARS-CoV-2及其早期变体的人畜共患潜力已经得到了很好的研究,但缺乏关于欧米克隆变体和SARS-CoV的信息。在这项研究中,我们生成了以慢病毒为基础的假病毒,携带SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白(S),亲本和Omicron变体,包括BA.1.1、BA.4/5、XBB.1和JN.1,以评估其进入表达人类或动物ACE2的细胞,包括狗、猫和白尾鹿。利用这些假病毒,以及携带MERS-CoV和SARS-CoV S的假病毒,我们通过western blotting、进入/抑制试验和融合试验评估了这些不同S的蛋白酶处理。结果表明,总体而言,携带SARS-CoV-2 Omicron毒株各S的假型病毒进入表达人或动物ACE2的细胞的效率与亲本毒株相当(BA.1.1和JN.1)或更好(BA.4/5和XBB.1)。此外,携带SARS-CoV S的假型病毒的进入物对表达人或动物ACE2的细胞也有效。TMPRSS2的存在显著增加了MERS-CoV、SARS-CoV和SARS-CoV-2中S型假病毒的入量,其中BA.1.1、JN1和XBB.1 Omicron的入量增加幅度最大。当检测组织蛋白酶抑制剂以评估其对亲本和Omicron变体的进入抑制作用时,它们对Omicron变体的进入效果明显低于亲本菌株,这表明与亲本菌株相比,Omicron菌株不依赖于内体途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Host susceptibilities and entry processes of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants using pseudotyped viruses carrying spike protein.

The zoonotic potential has been well studied for SARS-CoV-2 and its earlier variants, but the information for Omicron variants and SARS-CoV is lacking. In this study, we generated lentivirus-based pseudoviruses carrying spike protein (S) of SARS-CoV-2, parental and Omicron variants including BA.1.1, BA.4/5, XBB.1 and JN.1 to assess the entry into cells expressing human or animal ACE2 including dogs, cats and white-tailed deer. Using these pseudoviruses, along with pseudoviruses carrying S of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV, we assessed the protease processing of these various S through western blotting, entry/inhibition assays, and fusion assays. The results showed that overall, pseudotyped viruses carrying each S of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron strains efficiently entered cells expressing human or animal ACE2 comparably (BA.1.1 and JN.1) or better (BA.4/5 and XBB.1) than those with parental strain. In addition, the entries of pseudotyped viruses carrying S of SARS-CoV were also efficient the cells expressing human or animal ACE2. The presence of TMPRSS2 significantly increased the entry of all tested pseudoviruses including those with S of MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, with BA.1.1, JN1, and XBB.1 Omicron having the largest fold increase. When cathepsin inhibitors were examined to assess their inhibitory effects on entry of parental and Omicron variants, they were significantly less effective in the entry of Omicron variants compared to parent strain, suggesting Omicron strains do not depend on the endosomal route compared to parental strain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Veterinary Research
BMC Veterinary Research VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
420
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Veterinary Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of veterinary science and medicine, including the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of medical conditions of domestic, companion, farm and wild animals, as well as the biomedical processes that underlie their health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信