探索枪弹残留物的分析化学:有机和无机分析的创新与障碍。

IF 4.2 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Paulo Tonin, Sidnei Moura
{"title":"探索枪弹残留物的分析化学:有机和无机分析的创新与障碍。","authors":"Paulo Tonin, Sidnei Moura","doi":"10.1080/10408347.2025.2512175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review highlighted an overview of the techniques for analyzing gunshot residues (GSR) of both inorganic and organic compounds, with emphasis on the evolution of forensic firearms analysis over the crucial two decades. The scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM-EDS) remains the standard for detecting inorganic gunshot residues (IGSR), which with advancements in ammunition necessitate the continuous adaptation of forensic laboratories. Meanwhile, for organic gunshot residues (OGSR), there are emerging analytical methods, particularly mass spectrometry and chromatography techniques, useful mainly for the identification of residues in ammunition that do not have (or with reduced content) of the metals traditionally identified by IGSR. Furthermore, this review discusses the limitations of current techniques, including extensive sample preparation and the destructive nature of certain analyses. The integration of different methods is crucial for providing a broader and more detailed characterization of GSR, reflecting the increasing complexity of contemporary forensic cases. Here we detail the results of approximately 80 articles published for the identification of IGSR and OGSR published during the past five decades, with comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of the techniques, being this review is a guide for future studies in the area, as well as useful to forensics experts.</p>","PeriodicalId":10744,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Analytical Chemistry in Gunshot Residue: Innovations and Obstacles in Organic and Inorganic Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Paulo Tonin, Sidnei Moura\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10408347.2025.2512175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This review highlighted an overview of the techniques for analyzing gunshot residues (GSR) of both inorganic and organic compounds, with emphasis on the evolution of forensic firearms analysis over the crucial two decades. The scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM-EDS) remains the standard for detecting inorganic gunshot residues (IGSR), which with advancements in ammunition necessitate the continuous adaptation of forensic laboratories. Meanwhile, for organic gunshot residues (OGSR), there are emerging analytical methods, particularly mass spectrometry and chromatography techniques, useful mainly for the identification of residues in ammunition that do not have (or with reduced content) of the metals traditionally identified by IGSR. Furthermore, this review discusses the limitations of current techniques, including extensive sample preparation and the destructive nature of certain analyses. The integration of different methods is crucial for providing a broader and more detailed characterization of GSR, reflecting the increasing complexity of contemporary forensic cases. Here we detail the results of approximately 80 articles published for the identification of IGSR and OGSR published during the past five decades, with comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of the techniques, being this review is a guide for future studies in the area, as well as useful to forensics experts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2025.2512175\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2025.2512175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本综述重点介绍了无机和有机化合物枪弹残留物(GSR)分析技术的概况,重点介绍了法医枪支分析在关键的二十年中的发展。扫描电子显微镜/能量色散x射线光谱法(SEM-EDS)仍然是检测无机射击残留物(IGSR)的标准,随着弹药的进步,法医实验室需要不断适应。同时,对于有机射击残留物(OGSR),出现了新兴的分析方法,特别是质谱和色谱技术,主要用于鉴定弹药中不含(或含量减少)传统上由IGSR鉴定的金属的残留物。此外,本文还讨论了当前技术的局限性,包括广泛的样品制备和某些分析的破坏性。不同方法的整合对于提供更广泛和更详细的GSR特征至关重要,反映了当代法医案件日益复杂。在这里,我们详细介绍了过去五十年来发表的关于识别IGSR和OGSR的大约80篇文章的结果,并比较了这两种技术的优缺点,因为这篇综述是该领域未来研究的指南,对法医专家也很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Analytical Chemistry in Gunshot Residue: Innovations and Obstacles in Organic and Inorganic Analysis.

This review highlighted an overview of the techniques for analyzing gunshot residues (GSR) of both inorganic and organic compounds, with emphasis on the evolution of forensic firearms analysis over the crucial two decades. The scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM-EDS) remains the standard for detecting inorganic gunshot residues (IGSR), which with advancements in ammunition necessitate the continuous adaptation of forensic laboratories. Meanwhile, for organic gunshot residues (OGSR), there are emerging analytical methods, particularly mass spectrometry and chromatography techniques, useful mainly for the identification of residues in ammunition that do not have (or with reduced content) of the metals traditionally identified by IGSR. Furthermore, this review discusses the limitations of current techniques, including extensive sample preparation and the destructive nature of certain analyses. The integration of different methods is crucial for providing a broader and more detailed characterization of GSR, reflecting the increasing complexity of contemporary forensic cases. Here we detail the results of approximately 80 articles published for the identification of IGSR and OGSR published during the past five decades, with comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of the techniques, being this review is a guide for future studies in the area, as well as useful to forensics experts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry continues to be a dependable resource for both the expert and the student by providing in-depth, scholarly, insightful reviews of important topics within the discipline of analytical chemistry and related measurement sciences. The journal exclusively publishes review articles that illuminate the underlying science, that evaluate the field''s status by putting recent developments into proper perspective and context, and that speculate on possible future developments. A limited number of articles are of a "tutorial" format written by experts for scientists seeking introduction or clarification in a new area. This journal serves as a forum for linking various underlying components in broad and interdisciplinary means, while maintaining balance between applied and fundamental research. Topics we are interested in receiving reviews on are the following: · chemical analysis; · instrumentation; · chemometrics; · analytical biochemistry; · medicinal analysis; · forensics; · environmental sciences; · applied physics; · and material science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信