腹腔镜手术中的目标检测:基于自定义子宫内膜异位症数据集的深度学习模型的比较研究。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Andrey Bondarenko, Vilen Jumutc, Antoine Netter, Fanny Duchateau, Henrique Mendonca Abrão, Saman Noorzadeh, Giuseppe Giacomello, Filippo Ferrari, Nicolas Bourdel, Ulrik Bak Kirk, Dmitrijs Bļizņuks
{"title":"腹腔镜手术中的目标检测:基于自定义子宫内膜异位症数据集的深度学习模型的比较研究。","authors":"Andrey Bondarenko, Vilen Jumutc, Antoine Netter, Fanny Duchateau, Henrique Mendonca Abrão, Saman Noorzadeh, Giuseppe Giacomello, Filippo Ferrari, Nicolas Bourdel, Ulrik Bak Kirk, Dmitrijs Bļizņuks","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15101254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis presents unique challenges due to the complexity of and variability in lesion appearances within the abdominal cavity. This study investigates the application of deep learning models for object detection in laparoscopic videos, aiming to assist surgeons in accurately identifying and localizing endometriosis lesions and related anatomical structures. A custom dataset was curated, comprising of 199 video sequences and 205,725 frames. Of these, 17,560 frames were meticulously annotated by medical professionals. The dataset includes object detection annotations for 10 object classes relevant to endometriosis, alongside segmentation masks for some classes. <b>Methods:</b> To address the object detection task, we evaluated the performance of two deep learning models-FasterRCNN and YOLOv9-under both stratified and non-stratified training scenarios. <b>Results:</b> The experimental results demonstrated that stratified training significantly reduced the risk of data leakage and improved model generalization. The best-performing FasterRCNN object detection model achieved a high average test precision of 0.9811 ± 0.0084, recall of 0.7083 ± 0.0807, and mAP50 (mean average precision at 50% overlap) of 0.8185 ± 0.0562 across all presented classes. Despite these successes, the study also highlights the challenges posed by the weak annotations and class imbalances in the dataset, which impacted overall model performances. <b>Conclusions:</b> In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the application of deep learning for enhancing laparoscopic surgical precision in endometriosis treatment. The findings underscore the importance of robust dataset curation and advanced training strategies in developing reliable AI-assisted tools for surgical interventions. The latter could potentially improve the guidance of surgical interventions and prevent blind spots occurring in difficult to reach abdominal regions. Future work will focus on refining the dataset and exploring more sophisticated model architectures to further improve detection accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12110204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Object Detection in Laparoscopic Surgery: A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Models on a Custom Endometriosis Dataset.\",\"authors\":\"Andrey Bondarenko, Vilen Jumutc, Antoine Netter, Fanny Duchateau, Henrique Mendonca Abrão, Saman Noorzadeh, Giuseppe Giacomello, Filippo Ferrari, Nicolas Bourdel, Ulrik Bak Kirk, Dmitrijs Bļizņuks\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics15101254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis presents unique challenges due to the complexity of and variability in lesion appearances within the abdominal cavity. This study investigates the application of deep learning models for object detection in laparoscopic videos, aiming to assist surgeons in accurately identifying and localizing endometriosis lesions and related anatomical structures. A custom dataset was curated, comprising of 199 video sequences and 205,725 frames. Of these, 17,560 frames were meticulously annotated by medical professionals. The dataset includes object detection annotations for 10 object classes relevant to endometriosis, alongside segmentation masks for some classes. <b>Methods:</b> To address the object detection task, we evaluated the performance of two deep learning models-FasterRCNN and YOLOv9-under both stratified and non-stratified training scenarios. <b>Results:</b> The experimental results demonstrated that stratified training significantly reduced the risk of data leakage and improved model generalization. The best-performing FasterRCNN object detection model achieved a high average test precision of 0.9811 ± 0.0084, recall of 0.7083 ± 0.0807, and mAP50 (mean average precision at 50% overlap) of 0.8185 ± 0.0562 across all presented classes. Despite these successes, the study also highlights the challenges posed by the weak annotations and class imbalances in the dataset, which impacted overall model performances. <b>Conclusions:</b> In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the application of deep learning for enhancing laparoscopic surgical precision in endometriosis treatment. The findings underscore the importance of robust dataset curation and advanced training strategies in developing reliable AI-assisted tools for surgical interventions. The latter could potentially improve the guidance of surgical interventions and prevent blind spots occurring in difficult to reach abdominal regions. Future work will focus on refining the dataset and exploring more sophisticated model architectures to further improve detection accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"15 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12110204/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15101254\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15101254","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于腹腔内病变的复杂性和变异性,腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜异位症提出了独特的挑战。本研究探讨了深度学习模型在腹腔镜视频中物体检测中的应用,旨在帮助外科医生准确识别和定位子宫内膜异位症病变及相关解剖结构。设计了一个自定义数据集,包含199个视频序列和205,725帧。其中,17 560帧由医疗专业人员精心注释。该数据集包括与子宫内膜异位症相关的10个对象类别的对象检测注释,以及某些类别的分割掩码。方法:为了解决目标检测任务,我们评估了两种深度学习模型(fastrcnn和yolov9)在分层和非分层训练场景下的性能。结果:实验结果表明,分层训练显著降低了数据泄露的风险,提高了模型的泛化能力。在所有类别中,表现最好的FasterRCNN目标检测模型的平均测试精度为0.9811±0.0084,召回率为0.7083±0.0807,mAP50(50%重叠时的平均精度)为0.8185±0.0562。尽管取得了这些成功,但该研究也强调了数据集中弱注释和类不平衡所带来的挑战,这些挑战会影响模型的整体性能。结论:本研究为应用深度学习技术提高腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜异位症的精度提供了有价值的见解。研究结果强调了强大的数据集管理和先进的培训策略在开发可靠的人工智能辅助手术干预工具中的重要性。后者可以潜在地改善手术干预的指导,防止在难以到达的腹部区域出现盲点。未来的工作将集中在改进数据集和探索更复杂的模型架构,以进一步提高检测精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Object Detection in Laparoscopic Surgery: A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Models on a Custom Endometriosis Dataset.

Background: Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis presents unique challenges due to the complexity of and variability in lesion appearances within the abdominal cavity. This study investigates the application of deep learning models for object detection in laparoscopic videos, aiming to assist surgeons in accurately identifying and localizing endometriosis lesions and related anatomical structures. A custom dataset was curated, comprising of 199 video sequences and 205,725 frames. Of these, 17,560 frames were meticulously annotated by medical professionals. The dataset includes object detection annotations for 10 object classes relevant to endometriosis, alongside segmentation masks for some classes. Methods: To address the object detection task, we evaluated the performance of two deep learning models-FasterRCNN and YOLOv9-under both stratified and non-stratified training scenarios. Results: The experimental results demonstrated that stratified training significantly reduced the risk of data leakage and improved model generalization. The best-performing FasterRCNN object detection model achieved a high average test precision of 0.9811 ± 0.0084, recall of 0.7083 ± 0.0807, and mAP50 (mean average precision at 50% overlap) of 0.8185 ± 0.0562 across all presented classes. Despite these successes, the study also highlights the challenges posed by the weak annotations and class imbalances in the dataset, which impacted overall model performances. Conclusions: In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the application of deep learning for enhancing laparoscopic surgical precision in endometriosis treatment. The findings underscore the importance of robust dataset curation and advanced training strategies in developing reliable AI-assisted tools for surgical interventions. The latter could potentially improve the guidance of surgical interventions and prevent blind spots occurring in difficult to reach abdominal regions. Future work will focus on refining the dataset and exploring more sophisticated model architectures to further improve detection accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信