不同大麻提取物对斑马鱼癫痫模型的抗惊厥作用。

IF 4.8 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Biomolecules Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.3390/biom15050654
Karen Jackson, Maytal Shabat-Simon, Jonathan Bar-On, Rafi Steckler, Soliman Khatib, Snait Tamir, Paula Adriana Pitashny
{"title":"不同大麻提取物对斑马鱼癫痫模型的抗惊厥作用。","authors":"Karen Jackson, Maytal Shabat-Simon, Jonathan Bar-On, Rafi Steckler, Soliman Khatib, Snait Tamir, Paula Adriana Pitashny","doi":"10.3390/biom15050654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epilepsy is a widespread neurological disorder that remains a critical global public health challenge. While numerous antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are available, many patients either fail to achieve adequate seizure control or experience significant side effects. One promising alternative is pure cannabidiol (CBD), but using a whole cannabis extract may be equally effective and preferred for some patients. In the current study, we employed the pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced hyperactivity model in zebrafish to compare the effects of CBD with various cannabis extracts. We evaluated three cannabis strains, each subjected to three different extraction methods, and benchmarked the results against the commercially available AED valproic acid (VPA). Our findings revealed that 5.7 µg/mL of CBD and 10 µg/mL of different extracts significantly reduced movement compared to PTZ and VPA. In addition, effective extracts produced effects similar to pure CBD despite containing much lower molecule levels. These results reinforced and expanded previous evidence supporting the clinical potential of both CBD and whole cannabis extracts for seizure control while suggesting a possible entourage effect. Further research is necessary to determine which patients may benefit more from pure CBD versus those who might prefer whole cannabis extracts.</p>","PeriodicalId":8943,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecules","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12108886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Anticonvulsant Effects of Different Cannabis Extracts in a Zebrafish Model of Epilepsy.\",\"authors\":\"Karen Jackson, Maytal Shabat-Simon, Jonathan Bar-On, Rafi Steckler, Soliman Khatib, Snait Tamir, Paula Adriana Pitashny\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/biom15050654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Epilepsy is a widespread neurological disorder that remains a critical global public health challenge. While numerous antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are available, many patients either fail to achieve adequate seizure control or experience significant side effects. One promising alternative is pure cannabidiol (CBD), but using a whole cannabis extract may be equally effective and preferred for some patients. In the current study, we employed the pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced hyperactivity model in zebrafish to compare the effects of CBD with various cannabis extracts. We evaluated three cannabis strains, each subjected to three different extraction methods, and benchmarked the results against the commercially available AED valproic acid (VPA). Our findings revealed that 5.7 µg/mL of CBD and 10 µg/mL of different extracts significantly reduced movement compared to PTZ and VPA. In addition, effective extracts produced effects similar to pure CBD despite containing much lower molecule levels. These results reinforced and expanded previous evidence supporting the clinical potential of both CBD and whole cannabis extracts for seizure control while suggesting a possible entourage effect. Further research is necessary to determine which patients may benefit more from pure CBD versus those who might prefer whole cannabis extracts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomolecules\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12108886/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomolecules\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15050654\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecules","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15050654","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

癫痫是一种广泛存在的神经系统疾病,仍然是一项重大的全球公共卫生挑战。虽然有许多抗癫痫药物(aed)可用,但许多患者要么无法实现充分的癫痫控制,要么经历显著的副作用。一种有希望的替代品是纯大麻二酚(CBD),但使用整个大麻提取物可能同样有效,对一些患者来说是首选。在本研究中,我们采用戊四唑(PTZ)诱导的斑马鱼多动症模型来比较CBD与各种大麻提取物的作用。我们评估了三种大麻菌株,每一种都采用了三种不同的提取方法,并将结果与市售的AED丙戊酸(VPA)进行了比较。我们的研究结果显示,与PTZ和VPA相比,5.7µg/mL的CBD和10µg/mL的不同提取物显著降低了运动。此外,有效提取物产生的效果与纯CBD相似,尽管其分子水平要低得多。这些结果加强和扩展了先前的证据,支持CBD和全大麻提取物在控制癫痫发作方面的临床潜力,同时提出了可能的伴随效应。需要进一步的研究来确定哪些患者可能从纯CBD中获益更多,而哪些患者可能更喜欢全大麻提取物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Anticonvulsant Effects of Different Cannabis Extracts in a Zebrafish Model of Epilepsy.

Epilepsy is a widespread neurological disorder that remains a critical global public health challenge. While numerous antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are available, many patients either fail to achieve adequate seizure control or experience significant side effects. One promising alternative is pure cannabidiol (CBD), but using a whole cannabis extract may be equally effective and preferred for some patients. In the current study, we employed the pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced hyperactivity model in zebrafish to compare the effects of CBD with various cannabis extracts. We evaluated three cannabis strains, each subjected to three different extraction methods, and benchmarked the results against the commercially available AED valproic acid (VPA). Our findings revealed that 5.7 µg/mL of CBD and 10 µg/mL of different extracts significantly reduced movement compared to PTZ and VPA. In addition, effective extracts produced effects similar to pure CBD despite containing much lower molecule levels. These results reinforced and expanded previous evidence supporting the clinical potential of both CBD and whole cannabis extracts for seizure control while suggesting a possible entourage effect. Further research is necessary to determine which patients may benefit more from pure CBD versus those who might prefer whole cannabis extracts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomolecules
Biomolecules Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
1640
审稿时长
18.28 days
期刊介绍: Biomolecules (ISSN 2218-273X) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal focusing on biogenic substances and their biological functions, structures, interactions with other molecules, and their microenvironment as well as biological systems. Biomolecules publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications.  Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信