关于男性和女性的描述性和规范性刻板印象的加工及其电生理相关。

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Fernanda Weinstein, Andrés Contreras, Vladimir López, Pablo Rodríguez-Gómez
{"title":"关于男性和女性的描述性和规范性刻板印象的加工及其电生理相关。","authors":"Fernanda Weinstein, Andrés Contreras, Vladimir López, Pablo Rodríguez-Gómez","doi":"10.1007/s10508-025-03150-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gender stereotypes are a set of beliefs about men and women, including both descriptive beliefs, which refer to how men and women are, and prescriptive beliefs, which point to what men and women ought to be (e.g., Prentice & Carranza, 2002). To our knowledge, no electrophysiological studies have addressed the prescriptive dimension. Therefore, the present study pursued two main objectives: first, to compare the level of acceptance, reaction times (RTs), and the event-related brain potentials (ERPs) associated with the processing of incongruent descriptive and prescriptive stereotypes; and second, to compare the level of acceptance, RTs, and ERPs associated with the processing of these stereotypes depending on whether they refer to men or women. Regarding the first objective, prescriptive stereotypes present a higher number of disagreements, as well as smaller RTs, revealing certain rejection attitudes towards prescriptive stereotypes. In addition, descriptive stereotypes elicit a greater amplitude of the LPP component, revealing a higher evaluation by the participant compared to prescriptive stereotypes. On the other hand, stereotypes referring to women are resolved earlier compared to male stereotypes. Likewise, the amplitude of the N400 component also reveals some flexibilization of feminine stereotypes. Finally, female participants present faster RTs than male participants, which might be reflecting a facilitation of the processing of gender stereotypes due to a greater awareness about gender issues. These results seem to indicate a general acceptance of the conquest of traditionally male spaces by women, while the reverse process is still in an incipient state.</p>","PeriodicalId":8327,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Processing of Descriptive and Prescriptive Stereotypes About Men and Women and Electrophysiological Correlates.\",\"authors\":\"Fernanda Weinstein, Andrés Contreras, Vladimir López, Pablo Rodríguez-Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10508-025-03150-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gender stereotypes are a set of beliefs about men and women, including both descriptive beliefs, which refer to how men and women are, and prescriptive beliefs, which point to what men and women ought to be (e.g., Prentice & Carranza, 2002). To our knowledge, no electrophysiological studies have addressed the prescriptive dimension. Therefore, the present study pursued two main objectives: first, to compare the level of acceptance, reaction times (RTs), and the event-related brain potentials (ERPs) associated with the processing of incongruent descriptive and prescriptive stereotypes; and second, to compare the level of acceptance, RTs, and ERPs associated with the processing of these stereotypes depending on whether they refer to men or women. Regarding the first objective, prescriptive stereotypes present a higher number of disagreements, as well as smaller RTs, revealing certain rejection attitudes towards prescriptive stereotypes. In addition, descriptive stereotypes elicit a greater amplitude of the LPP component, revealing a higher evaluation by the participant compared to prescriptive stereotypes. On the other hand, stereotypes referring to women are resolved earlier compared to male stereotypes. Likewise, the amplitude of the N400 component also reveals some flexibilization of feminine stereotypes. Finally, female participants present faster RTs than male participants, which might be reflecting a facilitation of the processing of gender stereotypes due to a greater awareness about gender issues. These results seem to indicate a general acceptance of the conquest of traditionally male spaces by women, while the reverse process is still in an incipient state.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Sexual Behavior\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Sexual Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-025-03150-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-025-03150-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

性别刻板印象是一组关于男人和女人的信念,包括描述性信念,指的是男人和女人是怎样的,以及规范性信念,指的是男人和女人应该是什么(例如,Prentice & Carranza, 2002)。据我们所知,没有电生理学研究解决了规定的维度。因此,本研究追求两个主要目标:第一,比较与不一致描述性刻板印象和规定性刻板印象加工相关的接受水平、反应时间(RTs)和事件相关脑电位(erp);第二,根据刻板印象是指男性还是女性,比较与这些刻板印象处理相关的接受程度、RTs和erp。关于第一个目标,规定性刻板印象呈现出更多的分歧,以及更小的RTs,揭示了对规定性刻板印象的某些拒绝态度。此外,描述性刻板印象诱发的LPP分量振幅更大,表明参与者的评价高于规定性刻板印象。另一方面,对女性的刻板印象比对男性的刻板印象更早得到解决。同样,N400分量的振幅也揭示了女性刻板印象的一些灵活性。最后,女性参与者比男性参与者呈现更快的RTs,这可能反映了由于对性别问题有更强的意识,性别刻板印象的处理更容易。这些结果似乎表明,人们普遍接受了女性对传统男性空间的征服,而相反的过程仍处于初期状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Processing of Descriptive and Prescriptive Stereotypes About Men and Women and Electrophysiological Correlates.

Gender stereotypes are a set of beliefs about men and women, including both descriptive beliefs, which refer to how men and women are, and prescriptive beliefs, which point to what men and women ought to be (e.g., Prentice & Carranza, 2002). To our knowledge, no electrophysiological studies have addressed the prescriptive dimension. Therefore, the present study pursued two main objectives: first, to compare the level of acceptance, reaction times (RTs), and the event-related brain potentials (ERPs) associated with the processing of incongruent descriptive and prescriptive stereotypes; and second, to compare the level of acceptance, RTs, and ERPs associated with the processing of these stereotypes depending on whether they refer to men or women. Regarding the first objective, prescriptive stereotypes present a higher number of disagreements, as well as smaller RTs, revealing certain rejection attitudes towards prescriptive stereotypes. In addition, descriptive stereotypes elicit a greater amplitude of the LPP component, revealing a higher evaluation by the participant compared to prescriptive stereotypes. On the other hand, stereotypes referring to women are resolved earlier compared to male stereotypes. Likewise, the amplitude of the N400 component also reveals some flexibilization of feminine stereotypes. Finally, female participants present faster RTs than male participants, which might be reflecting a facilitation of the processing of gender stereotypes due to a greater awareness about gender issues. These results seem to indicate a general acceptance of the conquest of traditionally male spaces by women, while the reverse process is still in an incipient state.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: The official publication of the International Academy of Sex Research, the journal is dedicated to the dissemination of information in the field of sexual science, broadly defined. Contributions consist of empirical research (both quantitative and qualitative), theoretical reviews and essays, clinical case reports, letters to the editor, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信