主动拴绳预防乍得狗的麦地那龙线虫感染:时间和狗选择的影响分析。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hannah Smalley, Pinar Keskinocak, Julie Swann, Maryann G Delea, Obiora A Eneanya, Adam Weiss
{"title":"主动拴绳预防乍得狗的麦地那龙线虫感染:时间和狗选择的影响分析。","authors":"Hannah Smalley, Pinar Keskinocak, Julie Swann, Maryann G Delea, Obiora A Eneanya, Adam Weiss","doi":"10.4269/ajtmh.24-0673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Guinea worm, or dracunculiasis, has been targeted for eradication. Since the detection of the disease in animals, particularly domestic dogs in Chad, eradication efforts have become more challenging as animal infections perpetuate the cycle of infection and continue to put humans at risk. A wide range of community-based interventions is used to reduce infections, and the proactive tethering of dogs was introduced in 2020 to aid in the eradication efforts. This approach aims to contain dogs to prevent them from infecting water sources and to minimize exposure to water sources harboring infective Guinea worm larvae. However, tethering guidelines are not uniformly adhered to across communities. We adapted an agent-based simulation model to analyze various proactive tethering scenarios that consider dog selection methods, time of year, and time of day. Tethering 100% of dogs year-round but releasing them for part of the day (e.g., at night) results in 19-24% more infections compared with the full-day tethering of 60% of dogs year-round. Tethering 80% of dogs during the 3 months of peak infectivity, from April to June, results in 5-9% fewer infections than tethering 100% of dogs for 6 months during the dry season, from November to April. Because of the protracted prepatent period of Guinea worm disease (∼10-14 months), the results of interventions are not known until 1 year after they are implemented. Understanding the long-term impacts of tethering decisions when they are made is extremely important for achieving the ultimate goal of Guinea worm eradication.</p>","PeriodicalId":7752,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proactive Tethering to Prevent Guinea Worm Infections among Dogs in Chad: An Analysis of the Impacts of Timing and Dog Selection.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Smalley, Pinar Keskinocak, Julie Swann, Maryann G Delea, Obiora A Eneanya, Adam Weiss\",\"doi\":\"10.4269/ajtmh.24-0673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Guinea worm, or dracunculiasis, has been targeted for eradication. Since the detection of the disease in animals, particularly domestic dogs in Chad, eradication efforts have become more challenging as animal infections perpetuate the cycle of infection and continue to put humans at risk. A wide range of community-based interventions is used to reduce infections, and the proactive tethering of dogs was introduced in 2020 to aid in the eradication efforts. This approach aims to contain dogs to prevent them from infecting water sources and to minimize exposure to water sources harboring infective Guinea worm larvae. However, tethering guidelines are not uniformly adhered to across communities. We adapted an agent-based simulation model to analyze various proactive tethering scenarios that consider dog selection methods, time of year, and time of day. Tethering 100% of dogs year-round but releasing them for part of the day (e.g., at night) results in 19-24% more infections compared with the full-day tethering of 60% of dogs year-round. Tethering 80% of dogs during the 3 months of peak infectivity, from April to June, results in 5-9% fewer infections than tethering 100% of dogs for 6 months during the dry season, from November to April. Because of the protracted prepatent period of Guinea worm disease (∼10-14 months), the results of interventions are not known until 1 year after they are implemented. Understanding the long-term impacts of tethering decisions when they are made is extremely important for achieving the ultimate goal of Guinea worm eradication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.24-0673\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.24-0673","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

麦地那龙线虫病已成为根除的目标。自从在乍得的动物,特别是家犬中发现该病以来,由于动物感染使感染循环永久化并继续使人类处于危险之中,根除工作变得更具挑战性。采用了广泛的社区干预措施来减少感染,并于2020年引入了主动拴住狗的措施,以帮助根除工作。这种方法的目的是控制狗,以防止它们感染水源,并尽量减少接触含有传染性麦地那龙线虫幼虫的水源。然而,系绳指导方针并没有在各个社区得到统一遵守。我们采用了一个基于智能体的模拟模型来分析各种主动拴狗的场景,这些场景考虑了狗的选择方法、一年中的时间和一天中的时间。全年拴住100%的狗,但在一天中的部分时间(例如晚上)释放它们,与全年拴住60%的狗相比,感染的几率高出19-24%。在4月至6月感染高峰期的3个月里,拴住80%的狗比在11月至4月的旱季里拴住100%的狗6个月感染的几率低5-9%。由于麦地那龙线虫病的潜伏期较长(10-14个月),干预措施的结果要到实施一年后才知道。了解在作出捆绑决定时所产生的长期影响,对于实现根除麦地那龙线虫的最终目标极为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proactive Tethering to Prevent Guinea Worm Infections among Dogs in Chad: An Analysis of the Impacts of Timing and Dog Selection.

Guinea worm, or dracunculiasis, has been targeted for eradication. Since the detection of the disease in animals, particularly domestic dogs in Chad, eradication efforts have become more challenging as animal infections perpetuate the cycle of infection and continue to put humans at risk. A wide range of community-based interventions is used to reduce infections, and the proactive tethering of dogs was introduced in 2020 to aid in the eradication efforts. This approach aims to contain dogs to prevent them from infecting water sources and to minimize exposure to water sources harboring infective Guinea worm larvae. However, tethering guidelines are not uniformly adhered to across communities. We adapted an agent-based simulation model to analyze various proactive tethering scenarios that consider dog selection methods, time of year, and time of day. Tethering 100% of dogs year-round but releasing them for part of the day (e.g., at night) results in 19-24% more infections compared with the full-day tethering of 60% of dogs year-round. Tethering 80% of dogs during the 3 months of peak infectivity, from April to June, results in 5-9% fewer infections than tethering 100% of dogs for 6 months during the dry season, from November to April. Because of the protracted prepatent period of Guinea worm disease (∼10-14 months), the results of interventions are not known until 1 year after they are implemented. Understanding the long-term impacts of tethering decisions when they are made is extremely important for achieving the ultimate goal of Guinea worm eradication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
508
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, established in 1921, is published monthly by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. It is among the top-ranked tropical medicine journals in the world publishing original scientific articles and the latest science covering new research with an emphasis on population, clinical and laboratory science and the application of technology in the fields of tropical medicine, parasitology, immunology, infectious diseases, epidemiology, basic and molecular biology, virology and international medicine. The Journal publishes unsolicited peer-reviewed manuscripts, review articles, short reports, images in Clinical Tropical Medicine, case studies, reports on the efficacy of new drugs and methods of treatment, prevention and control methodologies,new testing methods and equipment, book reports and Letters to the Editor. Topics range from applied epidemiology in such relevant areas as AIDS to the molecular biology of vaccine development. The Journal is of interest to epidemiologists, parasitologists, virologists, clinicians, entomologists and public health officials who are concerned with health issues of the tropics, developing nations and emerging infectious diseases. Major granting institutions including philanthropic and governmental institutions active in the public health field, and medical and scientific libraries throughout the world purchase the Journal. Two or more supplements to the Journal on topics of special interest are published annually. These supplements represent comprehensive and multidisciplinary discussions of issues of concern to tropical disease specialists and health issues of developing countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信